Article

Is there a sleep debt?

Sleep (Impact Factor: 5.06). 10/2004; 27(6):1047-9.
Source: PubMed
0 Bookmarks
 · 
53 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The main aim of this paper is to consider relevant theoretical and empirical factors defining optimal sleep, and assess the relative importance of each in developing a working definition for, or guidelines about, optimal sleep, particularly in children. We consider whether optimal sleep is an issue of sleep quantity or of sleep quality. Sleep quantity is discussed in terms of duration, timing, variability and dose-response relationships. Sleep quality is explored in relation to continuity, sleepiness, sleep architecture and daytime behaviour. Potential limitations of sleep research in children are discussed, specifically the loss of research precision inherent in sleep deprivation protocols involving children. We discuss which outcomes are the most important to measure. We consider the notion that insufficient sleep may be a totally subjective finding, is impacted by the age of the reporter, driven by socio-cultural patterns and sleep-wake habits, and that, in some individuals, the driver for insufficient sleep can be viewed in terms of a cost-benefit relationship, curtailing sleep in order to perform better while awake. We conclude that defining optimal sleep is complex. The only method of capturing this elusive concept may be by somnotypology, taking into account duration, quality, age, gender, race, culture, the task at hand, and an individual’s position in both sleep–alert and morningness–eveningness continuums. At the experimental level, a unified approach by researchers to establish standardized protocols to evaluate optimal sleep across paediatric age groups is required.
    Sleep Medicine Reviews 10/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.smrv.2014.01.002 · 9.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to characterize the temporal patterns of sleep and wakefulness in a sample of the adult subjects from São Paulo city. All subjects filled the Morningness/Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) and wore an actigraph for at least three consecutive days. A total of 359 subjects were considered for the analyses. The mean age was 43±14 years, the mean body mass index was 26.7±5.7 kg/m2, and 60% were female. The mean MEQ score was 58.0±10.7. The sleep pattern evaluated by the actigraphic analyses showed that 92% had a monophasic sleep pattern, 7% biphasic, and 1% polyphasic sleep pattern. Cluster analysis, based on time to sleep onset, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, and total sleep time, was able to identify three different groups denominated: morning type, evening type, and undefined type. Morning type subjects were more frequent, older, and had higher MEQ scores than evening type subjects. Our results showed that the actigraph objectively assessed the sleep-wake cycle and was able to discriminate between morning and evening type individuals. These findings suggest that the actigraph could be a valuable tool for assessing temporal sleep patterns, including the circadian preferences.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In order to establish validity of an objective scale of alertness-sleepiness, one is forced to somehow calibrate it using subjective scales, such as the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS). We evaluated the effects of prolonged wakefulness on the extent of disagreement between objective and subjective KSS assessments, and tested whether calibration of an objective alertness-sleepiness scale can be established in despite of the limited reliability of subjective reports. Starting from 7p.m., the resting electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded with 2-hour interval over the last 32-50 hours of 44-61-hour wakefulness of 15 healthy study participants. Frontal and occipital scores on the 2nd principal component of the EEG spectrum and occipital alpha-theta power difference were computed for one-min intervals of 5-min eyes-closed EEG recordings. To obtain alertness scale's scores in the range from 5 to 0, positive and negative values of these EEG indexes were assigned to 1 and 0, respectively, and then summed. Although correlation between time courses of objective and subjective (KSS) scores was very strong, evidence for systematic errors in both the mean and the calibration was also found. Correction of these errors resulted in strengthening of correlation (r=0.99) and establishing one-to-one correspondence between the steps of objective and subjective scales. The results indicate that scores from 5 to 0 on the objective alertness scale can be anchored to minimal, mild, moderate, marked, severe, and disabling levels of sleepiness.
    International journal of psychophysiology: official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.07.010 · 3.05 Impact Factor