Article

Specific inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 by PD 0332991 and associated antitumor activity in human tumor xenografts.

Cancer Pharmacology, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (Impact Factor: 6.11). 12/2004; 3(11):1427-38.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT PD 0332991 is a highly specific inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (Cdk4) (IC50, 0.011 micromol/L) and Cdk6 (IC50, 0.016 micromol/L), having no activity against a panel of 36 additional protein kinases. It is a potent antiproliferative agent against retinoblastoma (Rb)-positive tumor cells in vitro, inducing an exclusive G1 arrest, with a concomitant reduction of phospho-Ser780/Ser795 on the Rb protein. Oral administration of PD 0332991 to mice bearing the Colo-205 human colon carcinoma produces marked tumor regression. Therapeutic doses of PD 0332991 cause elimination of phospho-Rb and the proliferative marker Ki-67 in tumor tissue and down-regulation of genes under the transcriptional control of E2F. The results indicate that inhibition of Cdk4/6 alone is sufficient to cause tumor regression and a net reduction in tumor burden in some tumors.

0 Followers
 · 
143 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Deficiencies in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair lead to genetic instability, a recognized cause of cancer initiation and evolution. We report that the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (RB1) is required for DNA DSB repair by canonical non-homologous end-joining (cNHEJ). Support of cNHEJ involves a mechanism independent of RB1's cell-cycle function and depends on its amino terminal domain with which it binds to NHEJ components XRCC5 and XRCC6. Cells with engineered loss of RB family function as well as cancer-derived cells with mutational RB1 loss show substantially reduced levels of cNHEJ. RB1 variants disabled for the interaction with XRCC5 and XRCC6, including a cancer-associated variant, are unable to support cNHEJ despite being able to confer cell-cycle control. Our data identify RB1 loss as a candidate driver of structural genomic instability and a causative factor for cancer somatic heterogeneity and evolution. Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Cell Reports 03/2015; 10(12). DOI:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.059 · 7.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: eLife digest Cells go through a tightly controlled, multi-step procedure before they divide. This cell division program—the cell cycle—is necessary for preventing unrestrained cellular growth, which may lead to cancer. Proteins called cyclins control the progression through each of the phases of the cell cycle, with different cyclins working during different phases. During the G1 phase of the cell cycle, cells grow in size and produce the proteins that are required to copy DNA. Once a cell passes a checkpoint called the 'restriction point' at the end of the G1 phase, it is committed to dividing. It is therefore particularly important to keep events during G1 phase in check. The Retinoblastoma tumor suppresor protein (Rb) is a key player in regulating the G1 phase. Rb sequesters transcription factors that are essential for the cell cycle to progress. Previously, it was thought that a complex called cyclin D added more and more phosphates to the Rb protein during the G1 phase. This process predicted a slow release of transcription factors, which attach to DNA and start the process of DNA replication. While many studies have presented data that is consistent with this model, direct biochemical evidence of these events is lacking. Narasimha, Kaulich, Shapiro et al. now present biochemical analyses of Rb proteins that show—completely unexpectedly—that the cyclin D complex adds just one phosphate group to Rb during the G1 phase, although this group can be added to one of fourteen different sites. The resulting 'mono-phosphorylated' Rb varieties can each sequester different transcription factors and stop them working. At the restriction point, many more phosphate groups are then rapidly added, and the Rb protein is inactivated by a different cyclin. This cyclin—called Cyclin E—then drives cells into the next phase of the cell cycle. Establishing how cyclin E is activated is a priority for future research. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02872.002
    eLife Sciences 05/2014; 3:e02872. DOI:10.7554/eLife.02872 · 8.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Exposure to biologically active substances such as therapeutic drugs or environmental toxicants can impact biological systems at various levels, affecting individual molecules, signaling pathways, and overall cellular processes. The ability to derive mechanistic insights from the resulting systems responses requires the integration of experimental measures with a priori knowledge about the system and the interacting molecules therein. We developed a novel systems biology-based methodology that leverages mechanistic network models and transcriptomic data to quantitatively assess the biological impact of exposures to active substances. Hierarchically organized network models were first constructed to provide a coherent framework for investigating the impact of exposures at the molecular, pathway and process levels. We then validated our methodology using novel and previously published experiments. For both in vitro systems with simple exposures to in vivo systems with complex exposures, our methodology was able to recapitulate known biological responses matching expected or measured phenotypes. In addition, the quantitative results were in agreement with experimental endpoint data for many of the mechanistic effects that were assessed, providing further objective confirmation of the approach. We conclude that our methodology evaluates the biological impact of exposures in an objective, systematic, and quantifiable manner, enabling the computation of a systems-wide and pan-mechanistic biological impact measure for a given active substance or mixture. Our results suggest that various fields of human disease research, from drug development to consumer product testing and environmental impact analysis, could benefit from using this methodology.
    Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 08/2013; 272(3). DOI:10.1016/j.taap.2013.07.007 · 3.63 Impact Factor