transporters (VGLUTs) are responsible for filling synaptic vesicles with glutamate. To investigate how VGLUT expression can regulate
is expressed in glutamatergic motoneurons and a large number of interneurons in the Drosophila CNS. DVGLUT protein resides on
synaptic vesicles and localizes to the presynaptic terminals of all known glutamatergic neuromuscular junctions as well as to synapses
compensatory decrease in the number of synaptic vesicles released that maintains normal levels of synaptic excitation. These results
Synaptic strength is determined both by quantal content (QC),
terminal, and by quantal size, the postsynaptic response to the
ling quantal size (Malinow and Malenka, 2002); however, the
also affect the postsynaptic response (Choi et al., 2000; Renger et
nant of quantal size. Because vesicular neurotransmitter trans-
porters load vesicles with transmitter, their expression and activ-
ity may determine the transmitter content of synaptic vesicles.
been identified: the vesicular transporters for monoamines
(VMATs) and acetylcholine (VAChT) (Erickson et al., 1992,
1994; Liu et al., 1992; Roghani et al., 1994), the vesicular trans-
porter for GABA and glycine (VGAT or VIAAT) (McIntire et al.,
1997), and the three recently isolated vesicular glutamate trans-
porters (VGLUTs 1–3) (Bellocchio et al., 2000; Takamori et al.,
2000; Fremeau et al., 2002). Expression of these transporters can
expression of VMAT (Colliver et al., 2000; Pothos et al., 2000),
various cultured cells increases quantal size. For monoamines,
this increase in quantal size is accompanied by an increase in
vesicular volume (Colliver et al., 2000; Gong et al., 2003). The
relationship among transporter expression, transmitter content,
and vesicle size has not been investigated for classical fast trans-
mitters such as glutamate.
VGLUTs load synaptic vesicles with glutamate. The deletion
of VGLUT1 in the mouse leads to a dramatic impairment of
glutamatergic transmission (Fremeau et al., 2004; Wojcik et al.,
matergic neurons increases quantal size at autaptic synapses
(Wojcik et al., 2004); however, the functional consequences of
excess glutamate for the efficacy of an intact synapse are
To explore how the expression of VGLUT within its normal
synaptic milieu regulates synaptic strength, we identified and
Health training grant (GM08151) (R.W.D.), the Damon Runyon Foundation (C.A.C.), a Howard Hughes Medical
Institute summer fellowship (M.V.G.), and grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH01709), the
10466 • TheJournalofNeuroscience,November17,2004 • 24(46):10466–10474
characterized the Drosophila VGLUT homolog, DVGLUT. DV-
motoneurons and interneurons, and is present at the synaptic
terminals of all identified glutamatergic neuromuscular junc-
tions (NMJs). Overexpression of DVGLUT in motoneurons in-
excitatory junctional potentials (mEJPs) to larger amplitudes.
This physiological change is accompanied by a morphological
change: synaptic vesicles are larger. This suggests that DVGLUT
expression can regulate the total glutamate content of a vesicle
but that the concentration of glutamate stays roughly constant.
release for the function of the intact NMJ. Despite the increased
postsynaptic response to single vesicles, the response to the
evoked release of vesicles was unchanged because of a compen-
satory downregulation of presynaptic vesicle release. Hence, ho-
meostatic mechanisms exist at the Drosophila NMJ to attenuate
the excitatory effects of excess glutamate release.
Genetics. cDNAs for CG9887 (RH57669 and RH74545) and for CG4288
(AT07766 and AT14282) were obtained from the Berkeley Drosophila
Genome Project expressed sequence tag collection. The two cDNAs for
CG9887 were sequenced to completion and are identical. Both demon-
ing a 207 bp exon that was predicted to be part of the final intron. This
added exon encodes an additional transmembrane domain that is also
present in vertebrate VGLUTs.
To generate the upstream activating sequence (UAS)–DVGLUT line,
the CG9887 cDNA was synthesized by PCR using a 5? PCR oligo GG-
(underlined) and 3? oligo CGGTACCTTACTGCTGCTGGTATCCCT
that introduced a KpnI site (underlined), sequenced, cloned into the
pUAST vector (Brand and Perrimon, 1993), and transformed into em-
bryos using standard techniques.
Drosophila were cultured using standard techniques. Crosses were
kept at 25°C on standard Drosophila medium. The BG380 Gal4 line ex-
presses in motoneurons and was a kind gift of Vivian Budnik (Budnik et
al., 1996). In all experiments, control larvae (referred to as wild type)
were BG380 Gal4 virgins out-crossed to Canton-S (CS) males.
In situ hybridization. Specific antisense probes were synthesized and
from clone AT07766 for CG4288 and clone RH57669 for CG9887.
Biochemistry. Glycerol gradient fractionations were performed as de-
scribed (van de Goor et al., 1995) with minor modifications. Approxi-
mately 100 mg of frozen fly heads were crushed over dry ice using a
EGTA, 0.1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1 mg/ml pepstatin,
2 mg/ml leupeptin, 20 mg/ml PMSF using eight strokes of a motorized
Teflon pestle on glass (Wheaton) at 900 rpm. After debris was sedi-
to capture rapidly sedimenting membranes. After centrifugation at 40.4
K rpm in an SW41 rotor (Beckman) for 75 min at 4°C, fractions were
ery System. Samples from each fraction were probed on Western blots
using primary antibodies to DVGLUT (1:10,000) and Drosophila synap-
tobrevin (1:2000), generously provided by Regis Kelly (University of
California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA), and late bloomer (lbm)
(1:100) (Kopczynski et al., 1996) followed by the appropriate HRP-
conjugated secondary antibody (Amersham Biosciences, Arlington
Heights, IL) and a chemiluminescent substrate (SuperSignal West Pico,
Pierce, Rockford, IL). Digital images were quantified using NIH Image.
Electrophysiology. Electrophysiological recordings were performed as
Briefly, wandering third-instar female larvae were dissected in ice-cold
Stewart’s HL-3 solution (Stewart et al., 1994) with no added calcium.
HL-3 solution contained (in mM): 70 NaCl, 5 KCl, 20 MgCl2, 10
recordings were made from muscle 6, segments A3 and A4, with sharp
borosilicate electrodes with resistance of 17–20 M? when filled with 3 M
KCl. Signals were acquired using an AxoClamp-2B amplifier (Axon In-
amplified using a Model 410 amplifier (Brownlee Precision, San Jose,
CA). Data were digitized using a Digidata 1320A board and stored on a
if input resistance was ?5 M? and membrane potential was less than
?60 mV. All recordings were made at room temperature.
Spontaneous mEJPs were recorded in nominally Ca2?-free HL-3 so-
lution with 1 ?M TTX added to prevent action potentials. The largest
mEJP recorded from the DVGLUT-overexpressing larvae was 32 mV.
After recording from each cell, the nerve was stimulated 10 times to
ensure that no events could be evoked. At least 60 consecutive events
were measured per cell using MiniAnal (Synaptosoft, Decatur, GA) and
averaged to determine the mean mEJP. Events with a slow rise time course
There is no statistically significant difference in the resting potential from
wild-type and DVGLUT-overexpressing larvae (BG380 Gal4/? Vm?
approximately half of the stimulations elicited responses in the muscle in
larvae overexpressing DVGLUT. Failures were counted by hand in both
Statistical analysis was performed and graphs were generated in Origin 7.0
cold PBS and fixed in Bouin’s fixative (1:5:15 ratio of acetic acid/forma-
Antibodies. The rabbit anti-DVGLUT antibody was raised against a
C-terminal peptide (–CQMPSYDPQGYQQQ) by Zymed Laboratories
(San Francisco, CA) and purified on an affinity column. Purified anti-
body was used at 1:10,000–1:25,000. This antisera recognizes a single
band of approximately the expected size for CG9887 on an immunoblot
and detects the transgenic overexpression of CG9887. Mouse anti-CSP
Tucson, AZ) and used at 1:50. Cy3-conjugated goat anti-HRP (Jackson
ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) was used at 1:1000. Differences in
synaptic DVGLUT level were assessed using an Alexa-488-coupled DV-
GLUT antibody at 1:1000.
Comparison of protein levels. Larvae of different genotypes were dis-
sected and stained together to ensure uniform processing. Confocal mi-
crographs were taken with a Nikon C1 confocal microscope of the syn-
apse on muscle 4 of segments A3 and A4 using a 60? oil objective
(numerical aperture ? 1.40) with a pixel size of 200 nm. Gain was set to
just below saturation on the sample with the highest staining intensity.
Complete Z-stacks through the synapse were flattened into a maximum
projection and saved for analysis. Analysis of staining was performed
using MetaMorph software (Universal Imaging, West Chester, PA).
Briefly, images were thresholded using the color threshold function, the
Danielsetal.•DVGLUTRegulatesQuantalSizeandSynapticVesicleVolume J.Neurosci.,November17,2004 • 24(46):10466–10474 • 10467
synaptic region was defined in the HRP channel, and the intensity of
DVGLUT within that region was measured.
lined Petri dishes with new insect pins in nominally Ca2?-free HL-3
solution and fixed for 1 hr at 4°C in electron microscopy grade 2.0%
paraformaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde, and 1% tannic acid in 0.1 M
ferred into 1% OsO4in CB for 1 hr at room temperature and stained en
sive concentration series of ethanol and propylene oxide and embedded
in Epon resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). Blocks were
sectioned in an RMC Ultra microtome at ?70 nm thickness with a Del-
aware diamond knife (Wilmington, DE) and poststained for 1 hr in
Reynolds lead citrate and uranyl acetate. Sections were viewed and mi-
crographs taken on a JOEL 100C transmission electron microscope.
Image analysis. Electron micrographs were taken from a total of 201
of each genotype. A total of 35 boutons from four nerves were used in
overexpressors, and 31 boutons from six nerves were used in wild type.
Each active zone was cropped in Photoshop and randomly coded. The
diameters of vesicles near active zones were measured blind to genotype
using MetaMorph software. Seventeen hundred vesicle diameters from
each genotype were used for the histograms shown in Figure 5.
We searched the Drosophila genome for sequences that could
encode an ortholog of the vertebrate VGLUT genes. The closest
Drosophila relative is an uncharacterized predicted gene called
CG9887, which shows 41% identity with human VGLUT1, 40%
identity with both mouse and rat VGLUT2, and 39% identity
with the Caenorhabditis elegans VGLUT1 homolog EAT-4 (Fig.
1a). In addition to having a well conserved sequence, CG9887
also has a very similar hydrophobicity profile to the vertebrate
VGLUTs (Fig. 1b). Both CG9887 and the VGLUTs are highly
hydrophobic, with many predicted membrane-spanning do-
mains. Amino acid identity within this highly hydrophobic re-
gion is 53%. After CG9887, the nearest Drosophila homolog to
the vertebrate VGLUTs is the uncharacterized gene CG4288. It
bicity profile (data not shown).
The Drosophila vesicular glutamate transporter must be ex-
glutamatergic synapses. The Drosophila NMJ is glutamatergic, so
we would expect to find mRNA for the bona fide transporter in
the cell bodies of motoneurons. In situ hybridization demon-
strates that CG9887 mRNA is expressed in a subset of central
ron cluster. CG9887 mRNA is expressed at a number of other
13 in a small group of segmentally repeating cells and later in a
large number of cells that are likely to be interneurons. In con-
trast, we were unable to detect expression of CG4288 mRNA in
any embryonic neurons (data not shown). Because the expres-
sion pattern of CG9887, but not CG4288, is consistent with that
expected for the Drosophila VGLUT, we initiated an analysis of
the protein encoded by CG9887.
Vesicular glutamate transporters function at the synapse on
synaptic vesicles. If CG9887 encodes the Drosophila VGLUT, it
should be present at glutamatergic terminals. Drosophila NMJs
can be differentiated into type Ib, Is, II, and III based on bouton
morphology and muscle target. Type Ib and Is terminals are the
classic glutamatergic terminals that mediate excitatory transmis-
sion, whereas type II terminals contain neuropeptides and are
thought to be neuromodulatory, and the type III terminals likely
secrete an insulin-like peptide. The type II terminals, however,
also contain high levels of glutamate as assayed by an anti-
glutamate antibody, and ionotropic glutamate receptors cluster
opposite not only Ib and Is synapses but also type II synapses
(Johansen et al., 1989; Marrus et al., 2004). We generated an
antibody to a unique C-terminal peptide from CG9887. This
antisera to CG9887 intensely stains all type Ib, Is, and II boutons
but not the type III terminal. Additionally, staining for CG9887
shows complete colocalization at type I and II terminals with
staining for the CSP, a known synaptic vesicle protein (Fig. 2b)
(Zinsmaier et al., 1994).
localization for CG9887, we wanted to test directly whether the
CG9887 protein is present on synaptic vesicles. We performed
biochemical isolation of synaptic vesicles from fly-head extracts
using glycerol gradient centrifugation. Because synaptic vesicles
and human VGLUT1 with identical residues shaded. Overall amino acid identity is 41%. b,
Hydropathy plots of human VGLUT1 and DVGLUT demonstrate that both proteins have very
10468 • J.Neurosci.,November17,2004 • 24(46):10466–10474Danielsetal.•DVGLUTRegulatesQuantalSizeandSynapticVesicleVolume
than the plasma membrane and other organelles, which rapidly
sediment to the bottom of this gradient, as shown previously for
both cultured neuroendocrine cells and Drosophila neurons
(Clift-O’Grady et al., 1990; van de Goor et al., 1995). The
ceptor (SNARE) n-synaptobrevin (DiAntonio et al., 1993; van de
bottom of the gradient. Together, these results demonstrate that
tamatergic cells, localizes to synaptic terminals, and is a synaptic
It was demonstrated recently that viral overexpression of mouse
VGLUT1 in cultured hippocampal neurons leads to an increase
in quantal size at autaptic synapses (Wojcik et al., 2004). We
wanted to investigate whether the expression of DVGLUT could
regulate quantal size in vivo when overexpressed in its normal
synaptic environment. To achieve tissue-specific overexpression
of DVGLUT, we used the Gal4/UAS transcriptional activation
system (Brand and Perrimon, 1993). We generated transgenic
flies in which the DVGLUT cDNA is under the control of the
yeast UAS promoter (UAS–DVGLUT). To restrict expression to
neurons, we crossed these flies to the neuronal Gal4 line BG380
Gal4 (Budnik et al., 1996). This led to a large increase of DV-
GLUT protein at the synapse; synaptic staining for DVGLUT in
larvae overexpressing the DVGLUT transgene was increased ap-
proximately threefold compared with controls (Fig. 4a) (n ? 16
NMJs; p ? ? 0.001).
segments A3 and A4 from control larvae and larvae overexpress-
ing DVGLUT. These mEJPs represent the electrical response in
the muscle to the spontaneous fusion of a single synaptic vesicle
with the presynaptic membrane. The amplitude of the mEJP de-
amplitude of the mEJP should also depend on the amount of
glutamate released from each vesicle (Karunanithi et al., 2002).
When DVGLUT is overexpressed presynaptically, we find an in-
crease in the mEJP amplitude, a result that is consistent with an
Sample traces from control and overexpressing larva are shown
in Figure 4, c and d. We observed an ?60% increase in mean
mEJP amplitude, from 0.98 ? 0.07 mV in controls to 1.59 ?
the gradient were analyzed by immunoblot with antisera against DVGLUT (top),
n-synaptobrevin (syb; middle), and lbm (bottom). b, Quantitation of the immunoblot in a
DVGLUT is a synaptic vesicle protein. a, DVGLUT cosediments with the synaptic
Danielsetal.•DVGLUTRegulatesQuantalSizeandSynapticVesicleVolumeJ.Neurosci.,November17,2004 • 24(46):10466–10474 • 10469
0.1 mV in overexpressing larvae ( p ? 0.001; n ? 12). Indepen-
dent insertions of the UAS–DVGLUT transgene show significant
increases in mean quantal size (Fig. 4e), so this phenotype is
caused by the presence of the transgene and not its site of inser-
tion in the genome. The change in quantal size requires the ex-
pression of DVGLUT, because UAS–DVGLUT transgenes in the
absence of GAL-4 had no significant effect on mean quantal size
( p ? 0.2; n ? 10; data not shown).
a few very large events or a shift in the size of all events. To
investigate these two possibilities, we constructed cumulative
probability histograms of mEJP amplitudes from control and
DVGLUT-overexpressing larvae (Fig. 4f). These two distribu-
tions are significantly different by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test
(p ? ? 0.001). The cumulative probability shown in Figure 4d is
an average cumulative probability ? SEM from 12 cells for each
( p ? 0.05). This analysis suggests that the entire population of
fact, when we scale the control mEJP distribution by 1.35 and
compare it with the distribution from overexpressing larvae,
these distributions overlap almost completely and are not statis-
tically different (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test; p ? 0.09).
These data strongly suggest that the increase in mean quantal
size is driven at least in part by the 35% increase in individual
?8 mV and occasional mEJPs are ?20 mV. These large events
skew the mean quantal size, thus resulting in the 60% mean in-
crease but only a 35% median increase. We find that these occa-
the absence of external calcium; therefore, they do not represent
evoked synaptic events that occur in response to residual nerve
activity and calcium–dependent exocytosis. To investigate
whether these events might contribute to evoked synaptic trans-
mission, however, we performed a failure analysis. At low exter-
nal Ca2?concentrations, nerve stimulation usually results in the
fusion of either one vesicle (an event) or no vesicles (a failure).
We used a calcium concentration (0.23 mM) that resulted in
?50% failures in mutant larvae to bias events toward low num-
bers of vesicles released in response to a stimulus. We evoked
?3000 events but did not observe any evoked event ?8 mV in
larvae overexpressing DVGLUT, in contrast to the relatively in-
1.4% of mEJPs ?8 mV represent 12 of 840 events. We conclude
that the large events are not evocable by an action potential. As
describes the functionally relevant increase in quantal size that
occurs when DVGLUT is overexpressed. Together, these data
demonstrate that overexpression of DVGLUT leads to (1) an
increase in the amplitude of the entire population of quantal
events and (2) the generation of a small population of very large
events that are not evocable. The demonstration that DVGLUT
overexpression shifts the entire distribution of mEJPs to larger
amplitudes supports recent similar findings with mouse
VGLUT1 (Wojcik et al., 2004).
In addition to the measured increase in mEJP amplitude, we
also observed a small increase in mEJP frequency in both geno-
BG380 Gal4/?; UAS–DVGLUT1/? ? 4.1 ? 0.4 Hz; BG380
0.05). This apparent increase in mEJP frequency suggests that in
wild type the smallest events may be lost in the noise of the re-
cordings. Hence, the measured increase in mEJP amplitude may
underestimate the true increase in quantal size, because these
smallest events are being measured in the DVGLUT overexpres-
sors but not in wild type.
The increase in quantal size with DVGLUT overexpression indi-
cates that more glutamate is loaded in each vesicle. This may
occur by increasing the concentration of neurotransmitter in the
vesicle or by increasing the volume of the vesicle. For the storage
of neuromodulatory monoamine neurotransmitters in special-
al., 2002; Gong et al., 2003). In contrast to monoamines, fast
transmitters such as glutamate are stored exclusively in synaptic
synaptic vesicle volume has not been explored.
performed an ultrastructural analysis of synaptic vesicle size at
the Drosophila NMJ. We reasoned that if transmitter concentra-
electrophysiological methods should correspond morphologi-
tration of transmitter within a vesicle represents a steady-state
value that can be changed by increased transporter activity, a
change in vesicle size would not be expected. To distinguish be-
apses on muscle 4 in wild-type (BG380 Gal4/?) (a) and DVGLUT-overexpressing (BG380
spontaneous mEJP amplitude of wild-type and DVGLUT-overexpressing larvae. Results from
two independent UAS–DVGLUT transgenes (UAS-98871and UAS-98872) are shown (**p ?
10470 • J.Neurosci.,November17,2004 • 24(46):10466–10474Danielsetal.•DVGLUTRegulatesQuantalSizeandSynapticVesicleVolume
tween these two potential mechanisms of increasing glutamate
at the NMJ of the type Ib motoneuron that innervates muscles 6
and 7 from both wild-type larvae and larvae overexpressing
DVGLUT (Fig. 5a,b). We found a 14% increase in mean vesicle
in DVGLUT overexpressors, and a median increase in vesicle
outer diameter of 10% (39.7 ? 0.1 nm in controls to 43.5 ? 0.1
nm in DVGLUT overexpressors). We also measured SV mem-
brane thickness and subtracted it from the outer diameter mea-
surements to yield estimates of inner diameter, which are more
directly proportional to volume. With an average membrane
thickness of 8.7 ? 0.1 nm, estimated vesicle volume changes by
61% (median) or 95% (mean).
The increase in vesicle diameter and hence volume is similar
to the increase in quantal size measured by electrophysiology. In
both cases, the entire populations are shifted to the right relative
to wild type, with the appearance of a few very large quanta and
vesicles that skew the distribution more to the right (Fig. 5c,d).
These results suggest that overexpression of DVGLUT increases
an increase in transmitter concentration.
The Drosophila GAL4/UAS system allows us to overexpress
DVGLUT within its normal synaptic environment and thereby
test its effect in vivo on an intact synapse. Having demonstrated
that increased DVGLUT expression can regulate vesicular vol-
ume and quantal size, we wondered how this excess glutamate
release might affect the efficacy of synaptic transmission. To as-
segments A3 and A4 in saline containing 0.47 mM Ca2?(Fig.
plitude of evoked events (EJP: 17.4 ? 1.0 mV in controls and
16.0 ? 1.0 mV in larvae overexpressing DVGLUT; n ? 13), de-
spite the increase in the amplitude of single mEJPs. Because the
DVGLUT overexpressors show an increased response to a single
of many vesicles, we hypothesized that fewer vesicles may be re-
leased in the overexpressor.
To assess whether fewer vesicles were released in the overex-
of QC is given by the direct method (QC ? EJP/mEJP), where
mean increase in the mEJP that we observed is likely to overesti-
the rare and very largest events are not evocable and skew the
quantal content using the median instead of mean mEJP. Using
this variation, we found that quantal content decreased by 33%,
DVGLUT (Fig. 6c) (n ? 13; p ? 0.01), strongly suggesting a
is independent of the observed size of the mEJP, we also calcu-
lated quantal content using failure analysis. Failure analysis does
not rely on the mEJP amplitude and does not assume that the
same vesicles contribute to spontaneous and evoked events. In-
stead, this method of estimating vesicle release is based on the
assumption that vesicular transmitter release will follow Poisson
statistics when the probability of release approaches zero from a
large number of release sites (Del Castillo and Katz, 1954). For
from wild-type (BG380 Gal4/?) (a) and DVGLUT-overexpressing (BG380 Gal4/?; UAS-
Gal4/?; UAS-98872/?; hatched bars) larvae. d, Cumulative probability histogram of mea-
sured synaptic vesicle outer diameter from wild-type (gray squares) and DVGLUT-
overexpressing larvae. Representative evoked junctional potentials from wild-type (a) and
the quantal content for wild-type and DVGLUT-overexpressing larvae recorded in 0.23 mM
A decrease in quantal content maintains normal evoked release in DVGLUT-
Danielsetal.•DVGLUTRegulatesQuantalSizeandSynapticVesicleVolume J.Neurosci.,November17,2004 • 24(46):10466–10474 • 10471
nerve to release transmitter. Many previous studies demonstrate
that these assumptions are valid at the Drosophila NMJ under
conditions of low external calcium (Petersen et al., 1997; Davis
and Goodman, 1998; Haghighi et al., 2003), and we therefore
performed similar studies using 0.23 mM external Ca2?. Under
these conditions, synapses overexpressing DVGLUT were more
ing by the method of failures demonstrated a 37% decrease in
quantal content (QC ? 1.01 ? 0.15 in controls; QC ? 0.64 ?
0.08 in overexpressing larvae; n ? 12; p ? 0.05) (Fig. 6d). There-
fore, two independent estimates of quantal content demonstrate
that when DVGLUT is overexpressed and more glutamate is re-
leased from a single vesicle, the synapse responds by releasing
synapse can decrease quantal content to maintain normal levels
of synaptic excitation in response to excess glutamate release.
transporter regulates the strength of a glutamatergic synapse in
vivo. Our goal was to perform these studies at the Drosophila
neuromuscular junction, a well characterized glutamatergic syn-
identified and characterized DVGLUT. We demonstrate that
DVGLUT is a synaptic vesicle protein that is present in the syn-
at the NMJ leads to an increase in quantal size. Hence, DVGLUT
expression can regulate the glutamate content of a synaptic vesi-
cle. We observe a corresponding increase in vesicle volume sug-
gesting that the vesicular glutamate concentration is likely to re-
main roughly constant despite excess glutamate content. Release
of this excess glutamate triggers a homeostatic mechanism that
downregulates the number of vesicles released by the motoneu-
ron, thereby maintaining normal levels of synaptic excitation.
We identified the predicted Drosophila protein CG9887 as a can-
bicity profile are similar to those of known VGLUTs and its
mRNA is strongly expressed in a subset of neurons. We have
demonstrated that CG9887 is a synaptic vesicle protein, is ex-
pressed at synaptic terminals of all known glutamatergic mo-
toneurons, and can regulate the glutamate content of synaptic
vesicles. Based on these findings, we conclude that CG9887 is a
Drosophila VGLUT. Because CG9887 is the only Drosophila gene
similar to the vertebrate VGLUTs that is expressed in neurons,
CG9887 may be the only Drosophila VGLUT.
the Drosophila nervous system has received little attention. We
pil of the brain and nerve cord, suggesting that glutamate is an
tamatergic terminals using the antibody to DVGLUT will aid in
the identification of the transmitter phenotype of identified cen-
tral neurons in Drosophila.
Overexpression of transporters for acetylcholine, monoamines,
and glutamate in cultured cells can increase quantal size (Song et
al., 1997; Colliver et al., 2000; Pothos et al., 2000; Wojcik et al.,
2004), suggesting that changing the expression or activity of ve-
sicular transporters may be a general mechanism for controlling
the transmitter content of vesicles. We have now tested this hy-
We generated transgenic flies that overexpress DVGLUT at
the glutamatergic NMJ. Increased expression of DVGLUT led to
vesicles. This increase in the mean response was attributable to
two factors. First, the entire population of spontaneous events
shifted to larger amplitude. The median amplitude increased by
35%, and the mEJP amplitude distribution was recapitulated by
scaling the wild-type distribution by a factor of 1.35. Second, a
DVGLUT overexpression. These events persisted in the presence
potential. Regardless of the nature of these rare events, the key
finding is that increasing the levels of synaptic DVGLUT in-
creases the postsynaptic response to the entire pool of synaptic
vesicles. Hence, the number of DVGLUT molecules in a vesicle
regulates the glutamate content of that vesicle.
The concentration and volume of glutamate in the vesicle will
affect the concentration and time course of glutamate in the syn-
into vesicles, so either the concentration of glutamate or the size
of the vesicle must have increased. To determine which mecha-
sured the diameter of synaptic vesicles from wild-type and
DVGLUT-overexpressing synapses. We observed that the entire
population of synaptic vesicles is larger when DVGLUT is over-
expressed. The calculated increases in the median (61%) and
mean (95%) vesicle volume are more than sufficient to explain
the observed increase in the median (35%) and mean (60%)
quantal size. Therefore, it is likely that the glutamate concentra-
tion in the vesicle does not increase with DVGLUT overexpres-
sion; however, because quantal size does not change as much as
vesicular volume, the glutamate concentration may actually be
somewhat lower than in wild type. Alternatively, postsynaptic
glutamate receptors may be approaching saturation in the mu-
tant and unable to faithfully record the full extent of the increase
in released glutamate, although the increase in quantal size that
we observe demonstrates that in wild type the glutamate recep-
tors are not saturated.
In previous studies of VGLUT and VAChT overexpression,
the increases in quantal size were interpreted as increases in the
concentration of vesicular transmitter (Song et al., 1997; Wil-
liams, 1997; Schuske and Jorgensen, 2004; Wojcik et al., 2004).
This led to a steady-state model of vesicle filling, in which inflow
through the transporters is balanced by a leak from the vesicle:
more inflow caused by more transporter therefore leads to a
higher steady-state equilibrium concentration of transmitter.
tration of transmitter is held constant, and more transporters
vesicle filling (Williams, 1997); however, these models do not
take into account the possibility that the volume of the vesicle
10472 • J.Neurosci.,November17,2004 • 24(46):10466–10474Danielsetal.•DVGLUTRegulatesQuantalSizeandSynapticVesicleVolume
concentration of transmitter is held roughly constant, but the
vesicular volume is changed by the number of transporter mole-
cules in the vesicle. A similar model has been described for the
loading of monoamines into secretory vesicles (Colliver et al.,
2000; Gong et al., 2003). Our findings suggest that despite differ-
ences between secretory vesicles and synaptic vesicles, a similar
mechanism can increase transmitter content.
Two models could explain the relationship between trans-
porter expression and vesicle volume. First, the volume of the
vesicle may be affected by its transmitter content; more func-
tional transporter would add more glutamate, which by an un-
known mechanism would lead to a larger vesicle. Alternatively,
transporter with its many membrane-spanning domains. These
models could be distinguished by the expression of a nonfunc-
Having used transgenic techniques to manipulate DVGLUT ex-
pression in vivo, we were able to ask about the physiological con-
sequences of this excess glutamate at an intact synapse. We find
glutamate per vesicle because the presynaptic terminal releases
fewer vesicles with each evoked event. It is possible that overex-
ever, it would be an unlikely coincidence that this would exactly
offset the increase in quantal size and produce a normal-sized
evoked event. Instead, we favor the model that a modest and
persistent increase in glutamate release from each vesicle leads to
a compensatory decrease in the number of released vesicles that
attenuates the excitatory effect of glutamate. Other homeostatic
mechanisms have been described at the fly NMJ. Various studies
have demonstrated that decreasing postsynaptic activity, either by
addition, nonvesicular leak of glutamate can homeostatically regu-
late postsynaptic glutamate receptor levels (Featherstone et al.,
or is it a direct effect of the increased glutamate in the cleft? We
have previously manipulated postsynaptic expression of gluta-
mate receptors leading to an increase in quantal size that is com-
lular glutamate, there is no compensation; quantal content is
unchanged and evoked synaptic events are larger (Petersen et al.,
1997). So increasing glutamate release by overexpressing
DVGLUT induces compensation, whereas directly increasing
postsynaptic excitation by manipulating glutamate receptors
does not affect cleft glutamate and does not trigger a compensa-
tory decrease in quantal content. In summary, postsynaptic re-
ductions in quantal size do initiate homeostatic compensation
pensation, but presynaptic increases in quantal size do trigger
sistent with the model that increased glutamate in the cleft di-
findings in culture demonstrate that the persistent excitation of
vertebrate neurons leads to a compensatory decrease in gluta-
mate release (Moulder et al., 2004). Such homeostatic mecha-
nisms could serve to limit the spread of excitotoxicity.
Bellocchio EE, Reimer RJ, Fremeau Jr RT, Edwards RH (2000) Uptake of
glutamate into synaptic vesicles by an inorganic phosphate transporter.
Brand AH, Perrimon N (1993) Targeted gene expression as a means of al-
tering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development
Budnik V, Koh YH, Guan B, Hartmann B, Hough C, Woods D, Gorczyca M
(1996) Regulation of synapse structure and function by the Drosophila
tumor suppressor gene dlg. Neuron 17:627–640.
Choi S, Klingauf J, Tsien RW (2000) Postfusional regulation of cleft gluta-
mate concentration during LTP at “silent synapses”. Nat Neurosci
Clift-O’Grady LLA, Lowe AW, Grote E, Kelly RB (1990) Biogenesis of syn-
Colliver TL, Pyott SJ, Achalabun M, Ewing AG (2000) VMAT-mediated
changes in quantal size and vesicular volume. J Neurosci 20:5276–5282.
Davis GW, Goodman CS (1998) Synapse-specific control of synaptic effi-
cacy at the terminals of a single neuron. Nature 392:82–86.
Davis GW, DiAntonio A, Petersen SA, Goodman CS (1998) Postsynaptic
PKA controls quantal size and reveals a retrograde signal that regulates
presynaptic transmitter release in Drosophila. Neuron 20:305–315.
DelCastilloJ,KatzB (1954) Quantalcomponentsoftheend-platepotential.
J Physiol (Lond) 124:560–573.
DiAntonio A, Burgess RW, Chin AC, Deitcher DL, Scheller RH, Schwarz TL
tic vesicle proteins. J Neurosci 13:4924–4935.
Erickson JD, Eiden LE, Hoffman BJ (1992) Expression cloning of a
reserpine-sensitive vesicular monoamine transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci
Eiden LE, Bonner TI, Usdin TB (1994) Functional identification of a
vesicular acetylcholine transporter and its expression from a “cholin-
ergic” gene locus. J Biol Chem 269:21929–21932.
Featherstone DE, Rushton E, Broadie K (2002) Developmental regulation
of glutamate receptor field size by nonvesicular glutamate release. Nat
Fremeau Jr RT, Burman J, Qureshi T, Tran CH, Proctor J, Johnson J, Zhang
H, Sulzer D, Copenhagen DR, Storm-Mathisen J, Reimer RJ, Chaudhry
FA,EdwardsRH (2002) Theidentificationofvesicularglutamatetrans-
porter 3 suggests novel modes of signaling by glutamate. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 99:14488–14493.
Fremeau Jr RT, Kam K, Qureshi T, Johnson J, Copenhagen DR, Storm-
MathisenJ,ChaudhryFA,NicollRA,EdwardsRH (2004) Vesicularglu-
sites. Science 304:1815–1819.
GongLW,HafezI,AlvarezdeToledoG,LindauM (2003) Secretoryvesicles
membrane area is regulated in tandem with quantal size in chromaffin
cells. J Neurosci 23:7917–7921.
Haghighi AP, McCabe BD, Fetter RD, Palmer JE, Hom S, Goodman CS
(2003) Retrograde control of synaptic transmission by postsynaptic
CaMKII at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Neuron 39:255–267.
Johansen J, Halpern ME, Johansen KM, Keshishian H (1989) Stereotypic
morphology of glutamatergic synapses on identified muscle cells of Dro-
sophila larvae. J Neurosci 9:710–725.
KarunanithiS,MarinL,WongK,AtwoodHL (2002) Quantalsizeandvari-
ation determined by vesicle size in normal and mutant Drosophila gluta-
matergic synapses. J Neurosci 22:10267–10276.
Kopczynski CC, Davis GW, Goodman CS (1996) A neural tetraspanin, en-
coded by late bloomer, that facilitates synapse formation. Science
Liu G (2003) Presynaptic control of quantal size: kinetic mechanisms and
implications for synaptic transmission and plasticity. Curr Opin Neuro-
Liu Y, Peter D, Roghani A, Schuldiner S, Prive GG, Eisenberg D, Brecha N,
Edwards RH (1992) A cDNA that suppresses MPP? toxicity encodes a
vesicular amine transporter. Cell 70:539–551.
Danielsetal.•DVGLUTRegulatesQuantalSizeandSynapticVesicleVolumeJ.Neurosci.,November17,2004 • 24(46):10466–10474 • 10473
Malinow R, Malenka RC (2002) AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic Download full-text
plasticity. Annu Rev Neurosci 25:103–126.
Marrus SB, DiAntonio A (2004) Preferential localization of glutamate re-
ceptors opposite sites of high presynaptic release. Curr Biol 14:924–931.
Marrus SB, Portman SL, Allen MJ, Moffat KG, DiAntonio A (2004) Differ-
ential localization of glutamate receptor subunits at the Drosophila neu-
romuscular junction. J Neurosci 24:1406–1415.
McIntire SL, Reimer RJ, Schuske K, Edwards RH, Jorgensen EM (1997)
Identification and characterization of the vesicular GABA transporter.
S (2004) Plastic elimination of functional glutamate release sites by de-
polarization. Neuron 42:423–435.
ParadisS,SweeneyST,DavisGW (2001) Homeostaticcontrolofpresynap-
Pawlu C, DiAntonio A, Heckmann M (2004) Postfusional control of quan-
tal current shape. Neuron 42:607–618.
Petersen SA, Fetter RD, Noordermeer JN, Goodman CS, DiAntonio A
(1997) Genetic analysis of glutamate receptors in Drosophila reveals a
retrograde signal regulating presynaptic transmitter release. Neuron
Pothos EN, Larsen KE, Krantz DE, Liu Y, Haycock JW, Setlik W, Gershon
MD, Edwards RH, Sulzer D (2000) Synaptic vesicle transporter expres-
sion regulates vesicle phenotype and quantal size. J Neurosci
Pothos EN, Mosharov E, Liu KP, Setlik W, Haburcak M, Baldini G, Gershon
MD,TamirH,SulzerD (2002) Stimulation-dependentregulationofthe
pH, volume and quantal size of bovine and rodent secretory vesicles.
J Physiol (Lond) 542:453–476.
Renger JJ, Egles C, Liu G (2001) A developmental switch in neurotransmit-
Roghani A, Feldman J, Kohan SA, Shirzadi A, Gundersen CB, Brecha N,
Edwards RH (1994) Molecular cloning of a putative vesicular trans-
porter for acetylcholine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:10620–10624.
Schuske K, Jorgensen EM (2004) Neuroscience. Vesicular glutamate trans-
porter–shooting blanks. Science 304:1750–1752.
Song H-J, Ming G-L, Fon E, Bellocchio E, Edwards RH, Poo M-M (1997)
Expression of a putative vesicular acetylcholine transporter facilitates
quantal transmitter packaging. Neuron 18:815–826.
Stewart BA, Atwood HL, Renger JJ, Wang J, Wu CF (1994) Improved sta-
bility of Drosophila larval neuromuscular preparations in haemolymph-
like physiological solutions. J Comp Physiol [A] 175:179–191.
Takamori S, Rhee JS, Rosenmund C, Jahn R (2000) Identification of a ve-
sicular glutamate transporter that defines a glutamatergic phenotype in
neurons. Nature 407:189–194.
Tautz D, Pfeifle C (1989) A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method
for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals trans-
lational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma
van de Goor J, Ramaswami M, Kelly R (1995) Redistribution of synaptic
vesicles and their proteins in temperature-sensitive shibire(ts1) mutant
Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:5739–5743.
Williams J (1997) How does a vesicle know it is full? Neuron 18:683–686.
mund C (2004) An essential role for vesicular glutamate transporter 1
(VGLUT1) in postnatal development and control of quantal size. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 101:7158–7163.
Zinsmaier KE, Eberle KK, Buchner E, Walter N, Benzer S (1994) Paralysis
and early death in cysteine string protein mutants of Drosophila. Science
10474 • J.Neurosci.,November17,2004 • 24(46):10466–10474Danielsetal.•DVGLUTRegulatesQuantalSizeandSynapticVesicleVolume