Article

Priority actions to improve the care of persons with co-occurring substance abuse and other mental disorders: a call to action.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3900 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6178, USA.
Biological Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 9.47). 12/2004; 56(10):703-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA) is the nation's largest, illness-specific organization run by and for people living with depression or bipolar disorder. In November 2003, the DBSA convened a conference to address the unmet needs of substance use disorders in persons with depression or bipolar disorder. The prevalence and severity of substance use disorders that are comorbid with other mental illnesses was acknowledged; however, the DBSA conference focused on comorbid mood and substance use disorders. Unless otherwise specified, the term "substance use disorders" is used in this statement to include the full spectrum of abuse and dependence on alcohol, nicotine, and illegal and prescription drugs. Participants included 43 experts in psychiatry, psychology, addiction treatment, health care policy, primary care, adolescent health, epidemiology, and advocacy. Presentations and deliberations from the conference and articles published in this special issue of Biological Psychiatry (Vol 56) are reflected herein. Participants listened to presentations, debated workgroup reports, and provided input to interim versions of this statement. All authors approved the final version. The objectives of this statement are to assess available data, describe unmet needs, and outline priority clinical actions and research directions that are needed to improve treatment, access to care, and professional training. Recommendations for priority actions are evidence-based, when possible; however, there is a remarkable lack of empirical data in this area. When data are available, they are often gleaned from heterogeneous populations that include patients with psychiatric diagnoses other than mood disorders. Thus, by necessity, the remaining priority action recommendations are based on the opinions and clinical experiences of the experts who participated in this conference. This statement reflects input from all participants. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

0 Followers
 · 
233 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract The nature of social support available to incarcerated women is not well-understood, particularly among women at high risk of negative outcomes, including women dually diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder and a Substance Use Disorder (MDD-SUD). Descriptive statistics and paired-tests were conducted on 60 incarcerated MDD-SUD women receiving in-prison substance use and depression treatments to characterize the women's social networks, including the strength of support, network characteristics, and types of support provided as well as to determine what aspects of social support may be amenable to change during incarceration and post-release. Study results showed that, on average, women perceived they had moderately supportive individuals in their lives, although more than a quarter of the sample could not identify any regular supporters in their network at baseline. During incarceration, women's social networks significantly increased in general supportiveness, and decreased in network size and percentage of substance users in their networks. Participants maintained positive social support gains post-release in most areas while also significantly increasing the size of their support network post-release. Findings suggest that there are aspects of incarcerated MDD-SUD women's social networks that are amenable to change during incarceration and post-release and provide insight into treatment targets for this vulnerable population.
    Journal of psychoactive drugs 05/2014; 46(2). DOI:10.1080/02791072.2014.890766 · 1.10 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The aim of the present study was to test promising constructs (decisional balance and drinking identity) and their interaction with gender as predictors of risky college drinking. We expected that, consistent with previous work, drinking identity would be positively associated with alcohol consumption and problems. We further expected that drinking identity would be more strongly related to outcomes among individuals scoring low in decisional balance. Additionally, we expect the relationship between drinking identity and alcohol behavior to vary as a function of decisional balance.Methods: Participants included 329 undergraduates (M = 23.11; SD = 5.63; 74.47% female) who met heavy drinking criteria (defined as women who consumed 4 or more drinks per occasion and men who consumed 5 or more drinks per occasion) and completed an online survey comprised of self-report measures.Results: Decisional balance was negatively correlated with both drinking and problems, which partially supported expectations. As expected, drinking identity was positively correlated with drinking and problems. A two-way interaction emerged between drinking identity and decisional balance regarding problems, indicating that drinking identity was associated with more problems, especially among those lower in decisional balance. A three-way interaction between drinking identity, decisional balance,and gender emerged regarding problems such that drinking identity was associated with more problems for those lower in decisional balance and this effect was stronger among men.Discussion: Findings lend support to the perspective that decisional balance, drinking identity, and gender are all influential factors that are associated with the experience of alcohol problems.
    Drug and Alcohol Dependence 10/2014; 143. DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.024 · 3.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We examined the effect on depressive symptoms of a peer network-oriented intervention effective in reducing sexual risk behavior and methamphetamine (MA) use. Current Thai MA users aged 18-25 years and their drug and/or sex network members enrolled in a randomized controlled trial with 4 follow-ups over 12 months. A total of 415 index participants recruited 568 network members. Linear repeated measures models were fit with depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale [CES-D]) as the outcome. Among indexes in the intervention condition, mean CES-D decreased from 20.0 to 15.7 (p < 0.0001) over follow-up. Controlling for covariates and changes in MA and alcohol use, CES-D in this group decreased by 0.35 points per month (95% confidence interval, 0.45, -0.25). All other groups showed minimal changes in CES-D score. The peer-oriented, community-based intervention designed to reduce MA use and sexual risk behavior also resulted in substantial reduction in depressive symptoms, independent of changes in MA use.
    Journal of Community Psychology 09/2012; 40(7). DOI:10.1002/jcop.21488 · 0.99 Impact Factor