Practice parameter: diagnostic assessment of the child with cerebral palsy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society.

Neurology (Impact Factor: 8.3). 12/2004; 63(10):1985-6; author reply 1985-6.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Objective: The Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society develop practice parameters as strategies for patient management based on analysis of evidence. For this parameter the authors reviewed available evidence on the assessment of a child suspected of having cerebral palsy (CP), a nonprogressive disorder of posture or movement due to a lesion of the developing brain. Methods: Relevant literature was reviewed, abstracted, and classified. Recommendations were based on a four-tiered scheme of evidence classification. Results: CP is a common problem, occurring in about 2 to 2.5 per 1,000 live births. In order to establish that a brain abnormality exists in children with CP that may, in turn, suggest an etiology and prognosis, neuroimaging is recommended with MRI preferred to CT (Level A). Metabolic and genetic studies should not be routinely obtained in the evaluation of the child with CP (Level B). If the clinical history or findings on neuroimaging do not determine a specific structural abnormality or if there are additional and atypical features in the history or clinical examination, metabolic and genetic testing should be considered (Level C). Detection of a brain malformation in a child with CP warrants consideration of an underlying genetic or metabolic etiology. Because the incidence of cerebral infarction is high in children with hemiplegic CP, diagnostic testing for coagulation disorders should be considered (Level B). However, there is insufficient evidence at present to be precise as to what studies should be ordered. An EEG is not recommended unless there are features suggestive of epilepsy or a specific epileptic syndrome (Level A). Because children with CP may have associated deficits of mental retardation, ophthalmologic and hearing impairments, speech and language disorders, and oral-motor dysfunction, screening for these conditions should be part of the initial assessment (Level A). Conclusions: Neuroimaging results in children with CP are commonly abnormal and may help determine the etiology. Screening for associated conditions is warranted as part of the initial evaluation.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to review the distribution of neuroimaging findings from a contemporary population cohort of individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) and to facilitate standardization of imaging classification. Publications from 1995 to 2012 reporting imaging findings in population cohorts were selected through a literature search, and review of the titles, abstracts, and content of studies. Relevant data were extracted, including unpublished data from Victoria, Australia. The proportions for each imaging pattern were tabulated, and heterogeneity was assessed for all individuals with CP, and for subgroups based on gestational age, CP subtype, and Gross Motor Function Classification System level. Studies from three geographic regions met the inclusion criteria for individuals with CP, and two additional studies reported on specific CP subtypes. Brain abnormalities were observed in 86% of scans, but were observed least often in children with ataxia (24-57%). White matter injury was the most common imaging pattern (19-45%), although the proportions showed high heterogeneity. Additional patterns were grey matter injury (21%), focal vascular insults (10%), malformations (11%), and miscellaneous findings (4-22%). This review suggests areas where further dialogue will facilitate progress towards standardization of neuroimaging classification. Standardization will enable future collaborations aimed at exploring the relationships among magnetic resonance imaging patterns, risk factors, and clinical outcomes, and, ultimately, lead to better understanding of causal pathways and opportunities for prevention.
    Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 08/2013; 56(3). DOI:10.1111/dmcn.12228 · 3.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To study the age at referral, of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities to Child Development and Early Intervention Clinic and compare the neuromorbidity and socio-economic profile of the early and late presenters. This retrospective observational study was conducted at Child Development and Early Intervention Clinic (CDEIC) located in Northern India. Case records of children enroled at CDEIC in last 5 y; with neurodevelopmental disabilities namely Mental Retardation/Global Developmental Delay, Cerebral Palsy, hearing and vision impairment were separated and studied. Two thousand and twenty cases were included in this study. 62.8 % presented before 3 y of age (early presenters) and 37.1 % presented at 3 y or more (late presenters). There was no difference in the overall rates and severity of mental retardation in early and late presenters. The proportion of children with quadriparetic cerebral palsy, hearing impairment, vision impairment and multiple disabilities was significantly more in early presenters. The early presenters had better parental education status, less number of siblings, better immunization status and more were delivered at a hospital and residing in urban areas. Large numbers of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities are referred late for intervention services, leading to loss of opportunity for early intervention. Children with purely mental disability are the ones, most likely to be referred late. Socio-economic differences are significantly contributing to these delayed referrals.
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics 04/2014; 81(11). DOI:10.1007/s12098-014-1344-4 · 0.92 Impact Factor