Article

Ruptured left coronary sinus of valsalva aneurysm into the left ventricle.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
The Annals of thoracic surgery (Impact Factor: 3.45). 01/2005; 78(6):2187. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01417-6
Source: PubMed
0 Bookmarks
 · 
66 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Macroautophagy or autophagy is an ubiquitous and conserved degradative pathway of cytosolic components, macromolecules or organelles, into the lysosome. By using biochemical and microscopic methods, which allow one to measure the rate of autophagy, the role of two regulators of Gi3 protein activity, activator of G-protein-signaling-3 (AGS3) and Galpha-interacting protein (GAIP), was studied in the control of autophagy in human colon cancer HT-29 cells. In HT-29 cells, autophagy is under the control of the Gi3 protein and, when bound to the GTP, the Galphai3 protein inhibits autophagy, whereas it stimulates autophagy when bound to the GDP. GAIP, which enhances the intrinsic GTPase-activating protein activity of the Galphai3 protein, stimulates autophagy by favoring the GDP-bound form of Galphai3. We showed that GAIP is phosphorylated on its serine 151 and that this phosphorylation is dependent on the presence of amino acids that modulate Raf-1 activity, the kinase upstream of Erk1/2. AGS3, a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor, stimulates autophagy by binding Galphai3 proteins. The intracellular localization of AGS3 (Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum, two membranes known to be at the origin of autophagosomes) is consistent with its role in autophagy.
    Methods in Enzymology 02/2004; 390:17-31. · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: The classification system of Sakakibara and Konno for sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA) is highly complex and seldom utilized in clinical practice. In this study, we propose a new and simple classification system; we suggest a novel approach that utilizes four distinct types of SVAs. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 257 cases of SVAs in which surgical repair was performed between October 1996 and December 2009 and divided these cases into four types: I, rupture or protrusion into the right atrium; II, rupture or protrusion into the right atrium or right ventricle near or at the tricuspid annulus; III, rupture or protrusion into the right ventricular outflow tract under pulmonary valve and IV, others. The surgical results of the different approaches in each respective type were compared as follows: cardiopulmonary bypass time, clamp aorta time, mechanical ventilation time, intensive care unit time and postoperative stay time. RESULTS: In all the patients, there was no early postoperative death; all the patients recovered and were discharged as expected. There were no significant differences in intensive care unit time and postoperative stay time among different approaches in each type (P > 0.05). Two hundred and thirty-eight (92.61%) patients were followed up. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair of SVAs exhibited good long-term results. Our classification of SVA could be potentially helpful for surgical practice. For Type I, the right atrium approach is advised; for Type II, the transaortic approach with a right atrium incision is advised; for Type III, the transaortic approach with pulmonary incision is advised while for Type IV, repair according to the respective situation is advisable.
    European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery 01/2013; · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 03/2009; 23(5):735-7. · 1.06 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
4 Downloads
Available from
Jul 16, 2014