From micro- to macroevolution through quantitative genetic variation: positive evidence from field crickets.

Department of Biology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, H3A 1B1, Canada.
Evolution (Impact Factor: 4.66). 11/2004; 58(10):2287-304. DOI: 10.1554/04-059
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Quantitative genetics has been introduced to evolutionary biologists with the suggestion that microevolution could be directly linked to macroevolutionary patterns using, among other parameters, the additive genetic variance/ covariance matrix (G) which is a statistical representation of genetic constraints to evolution. However, little is known concerning the rate and pattern of evolution of G in nature, and it is uncertain whether the constraining effect of G is important over evolutionary time scales. To address these issues, seven species of field crickets from the genera Gryllus and Teleogryllus were reared in the laboratory, and quantitative genetic parameters for morphological traits were estimated from each of them using a nested full-sibling family design. We used three statistical approaches (T method, Flury hierarchy, and Mantel test) to compare G matrices or genetic correlation matrices in a phylogenetic framework. Results showed that G matrices were generally similar across species, with occasional differences between some species. We suggest that G has evolved at a low rate, a conclusion strengthened by the consideration that part of the observed across-species variation in G can be explained by the effect of a genotype by environment interaction. The observed pattern of G matrix variation between species could not be predicted by either morphological trait values or phylogeny. The constraint hypothesis was tested by comparing the multivariate orientation of the reconstructed ancestral G matrix to the orientation of the across-species divergence matrix (D matrix, based on mean trait values). The D matrix mainly revealed divergence in size and, to a much smaller extent, in a shape component related to the ovipositor length. This pattern of species divergence was found to be predictable from the ancestral G matrix in agreement with the expectation of the constraint hypothesis. Overall, these results suggest that the G matrix seems to have an influence on species divergence, and that macroevolution can be predicted, at least qualitatively, from quantitative genetic theory. Alternative explanations are discussed.

  • Quantitative Genetics in the Wild, Edited by Anne Charmantier, Dany Garant, and Loeske E. B. Kruuk, 03/2014: chapter Evolutionary potential and constraints in wild populations: pages 190-208; Oxford University Press.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A key issue in evolutionary studies is the means by which evolution can be channeled by intrinsic processes such as genetic and development. Studying the phenotypic variation in a population can shed light on these constraints, because phenotypic variation, being the product of genetic and de-velopmental processes, is the target of both selective screening and random sampling. The main phenotypic variance in populations ("P max") could thus act as a "line of least resistance to evol-ution". Based on morphometric analysis of molar evolution in several fossil lineages and modern murine rodents, the role of P max as line of least resistance to evolution is investigated: Does evolution along lineages actually occur along P max? Does this line of least resistance facilit-ate parallel evolution? What is the relationship of P max to developmental processes and func-tional constraints? Case studies on murine rodent teeth are complemented by examples focusing on mouse mandibles. Compared to teeth, which are mineralized early during development, the mand-ible, as a bone, is prone to shape changes through remodeling in relation to masticatory muscles and other tissues. Mandible shape may thus vary throughout an animal's life due to allometric growth and, more generally, because of environmental influences. This may lead the mandible's P max to align with the direction of plastic and allometric variation. However, the same kind of shape change may also be produced by genetic changes. These examples illustrate how studying patterns of phenotypic variance using geometric morphometrics can help to identify evolutionary processes, bridging several evolutionary levels from intra-group variation to inter-group evolution, and therefore can contribute to an integrated view of phenotypic evolution.
    Hystrix 01/2013; 1(24):85-93. · 0.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: If genetic constraints are important, then rates and direction of evolution should be related to trait evolvability. Here we use recently developed measures of evolvability to test the genetic constraint hypothesis with quantitative genetic data on floral morphology from the Neotropical vine Dalechampia scandens (Euphorbiaceae). These measures were compared against rates of evolution and patterns of divergence among 24 populations in two species in the D. scandens species complex. We found clear evidence for genetic constraints, particularly among traits that were tightly phenotypically integrated. This relationship between evolvability and evolutionary divergence is puzzling, because the estimated evolvabilities seem too large to constitute real constraints. We suggest that this paradox can be explained by a combination of weak stabilizing selection around moving adaptive optima and small realized evolvabilities relative to the observed additive genetic variance.
    Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B Biological Sciences 08/2014; 369(1649). · 6.31 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 16, 2014