Article

Saccade dysmetria in head-unre strained gaze shifts after muscimol inactivation of the caudal fastigial nucleus in the monkey

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale /Université Claude Bernard-Lyon, Institut Fédératif des Neurosciences de Lyon, Bron.
Journal of Neurophysiology (Impact Factor: 3.04). 05/2005; 93(4):2343-9. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00705.2004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Lesions in the caudal fastigial nucleus (cFN) severely impair the accuracy of visually guided saccades in the head-restrained monkey. Is the saccade dysmetria a central perturbation in issuing commands for orienting gaze (eye in space) or is it a more peripheral impairment in generating oculomotor commands? This question was investigated in two head-unrestrained monkeys by analyzing the effect of inactivating one cFN on horizontal gaze shifts generated from a straight ahead fixation light-emitting diode (LED) toward a 40 degrees eccentric target LED. After muscimol injections, when viewing the fixation LED, the starting position of the head was changed (ipsilesional and upward deviations). Ipsilesional gaze shifts were associated with a 24% increase in the eye saccade amplitude and a 58% reduction in the amplitude of the head contribution. Contralesional gaze shifts were associated with a decrease in the amplitude of both eye and head components (40 and 37% reduction, respectively). No correlation between the changes in the eye amplitude and in head contribution was observed. The amplitude of the complete head movement was decreased for ipsilesional movements (57% reduction) and unaffected for contralesional movements. For both ipsilesional and contralesional gaze shifts, the changes in eye saccade amplitude were strongly correlated with the changes in gaze amplitude and largely accounted for the gaze dysmetria. These results indicate a major role of cFN in the generation of appropriate saccadic oculomotor commands during head-unrestrained gaze shifts.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Laurent Goffart, Sep 03, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
94 Views
 · 
50 Downloads
  • Source
    • "Unilateral FOR inactivation also impairs the ability to fixate small targets: when compared with the positions taken before inactivation, the gaze is directed toward positions that are shifted by ϳ1° toward the side of the injection, whether the head is restrained (Goffart et al. 2004; Robinson et al. 1993) or unrestrained (Quinet and Goffart 2005). The shifted spatial distribution of dwell times in Fig. 2B illustrates this change in gaze orientation, a disorder that has been called " fixation offset. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When primates maintain their gaze directed toward a visual target (visual fixation), their eyes display a combination of miniature fast and slow movements. An involvement of the cerebellum in visual fixation is indicated by the severe gaze instabilities observed in patients suffering from cerebellar lesions. Recent studies in non-human primates have identified a cerebellar structure, the fastigial oculomotor region (FOR), as a major cerebellar output nucleus with projections toward oculomotor regions in the brain stem. Unilateral inactivation of the FOR leads to dysmetric visually guided saccades and to an offset in gaze direction when the animal fixates a visual target. However, the nature of this fixation offset is not fully understood. In the present work, we analyze the inactivation-induced effects on fixation. A novel technique is adopted to describe the generation of saccades when a target is being fixated (fixational saccades). We show that the offset is the result of a combination of impaired saccade accuracy and an altered encoding of the foveal target position. Because they are independent, we propose that these two impairments are mediated by the different projections of the FOR to the brain stem, in particular to the deep superior colliculus and the pontomedullary reticular formation. Our study demonstrates that the oculomotor cerebellum, through the activity in the FOR, regulates both the amplitude of fixational saccades and the position toward which the eyes must be directed, suggesting an involvement in the acquisition of visual information from the fovea.
    Journal of Neurophysiology 04/2010; 103(4):1988-2001. DOI:10.1152/jn.00771.2009 · 3.04 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Independent control of the eyes and head occurs naturally at the level of the extraocular and neck motoneurons, although some form of separate processing has also been proposed to occur in cortical (Chen 2006; Chen and Walton 2005; Constantin et al. 2004, 2006), subcortical (Gandhi and Walton 2006; Pathmanathan et al. 2005a,b; Walton and Gandhi 2006), and cerebellar (Quinet and Goffart 2005) structures. It has been hypothesized that head movements associated with gaze shifts are driven by at least two parallel pathways: one is gated by the pontine omnipause neurons (OPNs) and issues movement commands to the eyes and head and the other bypasses the OPN gate and does not encode a saccadic eyemovement command (Corneil et al. 2002; Galiana and Guitton 1992; Goossens and Van Opstal 1997; Guitton et al. 1990). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Natural movements often include actions integrated across multiple effectors. Coordinated eye-head movements are driven by a command to shift the line of sight by a desired displacement vector. Yet because extraocular and neck motoneurons are separate entities, the gaze shift command must be separated into independent signals for eye and head movement control. We report that this separation occurs, at least partially, at or before the level of pontine omnipause neurons (OPNs). Stimulation of the OPNs prior to and during gaze shifts temporally decoupled the eye and head components by inhibiting gaze and eye saccades. In contrast, head movements were consistently initiated before gaze onset, and ongoing head movements continued along their trajectories, albeit with some characteristic modulations. After stimulation offset, a gaze shift composed of an eye saccade, and a reaccelerated head movement was produced to preserve gaze accuracy. We conclude that signals subject to OPN inhibition produce the eye-movement component of a coordinated eye-head gaze shift and are not the only signals involved in the generation of the head component of the gaze shift.
    Journal of Neurophysiology 08/2007; 98(1):360-73. DOI:10.1152/jn.00252.2007 · 3.04 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Full awareness of sensory surroundings requires active attentional and behavioural exploration. In visual animals, visual, auditory and tactile stimuli elicit gaze shifts (head and eye movements) aimed at optimising visual perception of stimuli. Such gaze shifts can either be top-down attention driven (e.g. visual search) or they can be reflex movements triggered by unexpected changes in the surroundings. Here we present a model active vision system with focus on multi-sensory integration and the generation of desired gaze shift commands. Our model is based on recent data from studies of primate superior colliculus and is developed as part of the sensory-motor control of the humanoid robot CB.
Show more