Progression from frontal–parietal to mesial–temporal epilepsy after fluid percussion injury in the rat

Department of Neurological Surgery, Center on Human Development and Disability, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Box 359915, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Brain (Impact Factor: 9.2). 02/2005; 128(Pt 1):174-88. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh337
Source: PubMed


We recently described an in vivo model of post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) in the rat where chronic spontaneous recurrent seizures appear following a single episode of fluid percussion injury (FPI). PTE, studied during the first 2 months post-injury, was focal and seizures originated predominantly from the frontal-parietal neocortex at or around the injury site. However, rarer bilateral seizures originating from a different and undefined focus were also observed. To shed light on the Posttraumatic Epileptogenic mechanisms and on the generation of bilateral seizures, we studied rats up to 7 months post-injury. In vivo paired epidural and depth-electrode recordings indicated that the anterior hippocampus evolves into an epileptic focus which initiates bilateral seizures. The rate of frontal-parietal seizures remained constant over time after 2 weeks post-injury, while the rate of hippocampal seizures greatly increased over time, suggesting that different mechanisms mediate neocortical and hippocampal post-traumatic epileptogenesis. Because of different temporal evolution of these foci, the epileptic syndrome was characterized by predominant frontal-parietal seizures early after injury, but by predominant mesio-temporal seizures at later time points. Pathological analysis demonstrated progressive hippocampal and temporal cortex pathology that paralleled the increase in frequency and duration of bilateral seizures. These results demonstrate that FPI-induced frontal-parietal epilepsy (FPE) progresses to mesial-temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) with dual pathology. These observations establish numerous similarities between FPI-induced and human PTE and further validate it as a clinically relevant model of PTE.

Download full-text


Available from: John W Miller, Jun 11, 2014
  • Source
    • "One of the most used strategies to simulate PTE is the fluid percussion injury model (FPI). In this model, a single episode of severe FPI is sufficient to cause PTE,97,98 and it may progress from frontal-parietal epilepsy to mesial TLE with dual pathology, as frequently found in human PTE.99 Neuropathological correlates of mesial TLE such as mossy fiber sprouting and hippocampal neuron loss are also present in the FPI model of PTE.98 Recently, Shultz et al100 examined predictive imaging and behavioral biomarkers for PTE in the FPI model, and the most representative imaging correlate in the animals that developed PTE was found in the ipsilateral hippocampus at 1 week postinjury. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract: Epilepsy is a chronic neurological condition characterized by recurrent seizures that affects millions of people worldwide. Comprehension of the complex mechanisms underlying epileptogenesis and seizure generation in temporal lobe epilepsy and other forms of epilepsy cannot be fully acquired in clinical studies with humans. As a result, the use of appropriate animal models is essential. Some of these models replicate the natural history of symptomatic focal epilepsy with an initial epileptogenic insult, which is followed by an apparent latent period and by a subsequent period of chronic spontaneous seizures. Seizures are a combination of electrical and behavioral events that are able to induce chemical, molecular, and anatomic alterations. In this review, we summarize the most frequently used models of chronic epilepsy and models of acute seizures induced by chemoconvulsants, traumatic brain injury, and electrical or sound stimuli. Genetic models of absence seizures and models of seizures and status epilepticus in the immature brain were also examined. Major uses and limitations were highlighted, and neuropathological, behavioral, and neurophysiological similarities and differences between the model and the human equivalent were considered. The quest for seizure mechanisms can provide insights into overall brain functions and consciousness, and animal models of epilepsy will continue to promote the progress of both epilepsy and neurophysiology research.
    Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 09/2014; 10:1693-1705. DOI:10.2147/NDT.S50371 · 1.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "[15] t1:1 Parasagittal FPI n.d. 100% (follow-up: 7 months) [16] [17] [18] t1:1 Increased susceptibility to PTZ-induced seizures, 12 weeks post-TBI n.d. [19] t1:1 Increased susceptibility to PTZ-induced seizures, 2 weeks post-TBI no [20] t1:1 Increased susceptibility to PTZ-induced seizures, 4 days post-TBI n.d. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can cause a myriad of sequelae depending on its type, severity, and location of injured structures. These can include mood disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder and other anxiety disorders, personality disorders, aggressive disorders, cognitive changes, chronic pain, sleep problems, motor or sensory impairments, endocrine dysfunction, gastrointestinal disturbances, increased risk of infections, pulmonary disturbances, parkinsonism, posttraumatic epilepsy, or their combinations. The progression of individual pathologies leading to a given phenotype is variable, and some progress for months. Consequently, the different post-TBI phenotypes appear within different time windows. In parallel with morbidogenesis, spontaneous recovery occurs both in experimental models and in human TBI. A great challenge remains; how can we dissect the specific mechanisms that lead to the different endophenotypes, such as posttraumatic epileptogenesis, in order to identify treatment approaches that would not compromise recovery? This article is part of a Special Issue entitled “NEWroscience 2013”.
    Epilepsy & Behavior 09/2014; 38. DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.01.013 · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The benefits of attention to controls are reflected in the study of Kelly et al. [23] who showed that both control and lesioned male rats experienced SWDs after photothrombosis; their careful analysis showed that lesioned animals did not develop SWDs more than controls. In contrast, D'Ambrosio et al. showed that male Sprague–Dawley rats developed stage 1–2 behaviors and rhythmic EEG activity after fluid-percussive injury, but not controls [75] [76] [77]. One method to address SWDs is to filter the EEG record between 7 and 12 Hz. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Spike–wave discharges (SWDs) are thalamocortical oscillations that are often considered to be the EEG correlate of absence seizures. Genetic absence epilepsy rats of Strasbourg (GAERS) and Wistar Albino Glaxo rats from Rijswijk (WAG/Rij) exhibit SWDs and are considered to be genetic animal models of absence epilepsy. However, it has been reported that other rat strains have SWDs, suggesting that SWDs may vary in their prevalence, but all rats have a predisposition for them. This is important because many of these rat strains are used to study temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), where it is assumed that there is no seizure-like activity in controls. In the course of other studies using the Sprague–Dawley rat, a common rat strain for animal models of TLE, we found that approximately 19% of 2- to 3-month-old naive female Sprague–Dawley rats exhibited SWDs spontaneously during periods of behavioral arrest, which continued for months. Males exhibited SWDs only after 3 months of age, consistent with previous reports (Buzsáki et al., 1990). Housing in atypical lighting during early life appeared to facilitate the incidence of SWDs. Spike–wave discharges were often accompanied by behaviors similar to stage 1–2 limbic seizures. Therefore, additional analyses were made to address the similarity. We observed that the frequency of SWDs was similar to that of hippocampal theta rhythm during exploration for a given animal, typically 7–8 Hz. Therefore, activity in the frequency of theta rhythm that occurs during frozen behavior may not reflect seizures necessarily. Hippocampal recordings exhibited high frequency oscillations (> 250 Hz) during SWDs, suggesting that neuronal activity in the hippocampus occurs during SWDs, i.e., it is not a passive structure. The data also suggest that high frequency oscillations, if rhythmic, may reflect SWDs. We also confirmed that SWDs were present in a common animal model of TLE, the pilocarpine model, using female Sprague–Dawley rats. Therefore, damage and associated changes to thalamic, hippocampal, and cortical neurons do not prevent SWDs, at least in this animal model. The results suggest that it is possible that SWDs occur in rodent models of TLE and that investigators mistakenly assume that they are stage 1–2 limbic seizures. We discuss the implications of the results and ways to avoid the potential problems associated with SWDs in animal models of TLE.
    Epilepsy & Behavior 03/2014; 32:121–131. DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.01.004 · 2.26 Impact Factor
Show more