Patient-centered communication: do patients really prefer it?

Program in Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, CA 94143-0320, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 11/2004; 19(11):1069-79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30384.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To investigate patient preferences for a patient-centered or a biomedical communication style.
Randomized study.
Urgent care and ambulatory medicine clinics in an academic medical center.
We recruited 250 English-speaking adult patients, excluding patients whose medical illnesses prevented evaluation of the study intervention.
Participants watched one of three videotaped scenarios of simulated patient-physician discussions of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Each participant watched two versions of the scenario (biomedical vs. patient-centered communication style) and completed written and oral questionnaires to assess outcome measurements.
Main outcome measures were 1) preferences for a patient-centered versus a biomedical communication style; and 2) predictors of communication style preference. Participants who preferred the patient-centered style (69%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 63 to 75) tended to be younger (82% [51/62] for age < 30; 68% [100/148] for ages 30-59; 55% [21/38] for age > 59; P < .03), more educated (76% [54/71] for postcollege education; 73% [94/128] for some college; 49% [23/47] for high school only; P= .003), use CAM (75% [140/188] vs. 55% [33/60] for nonusers; P= .006), and have a patient-centered physician (88% [74/84] vs. 30% [16/54] for those with a biomedical physician; P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with preferring the patient-centered style included younger age, use of herbal CAM, having a patient-centered physician, and rating a "doctor's interest in you as a person" as "very important."
Given that a significant proportion of patients prefer a biomedical communication style, practicing physicians and medical educators should strive for flexible approaches to physician-patient communication.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients with cancer commonly use complementary and alternative medicine, including herbs and supplements (HS), during cancer treatment. This national survey explored oncologists' knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns regarding HS use by their patients. A survey was sent by mail and e-mail to a random sample of 1,000 members of the American Society for Clinical Oncology. The questions covered several topics: communication patterns, attitudes about HS, education about HS, response to HS use among hypothetical patients with cancer, knowledge of HS adverse effects, and demographic information. Among eligible oncologists, 392 (42%) responded to the questionnaire. Most were white (75%) men (71%), with a mean age of 48 years (standard deviation, 9.8 years). On average, oncologists discussed use of HS with 41% of their patients; only 26% of discussions were initiated by the oncologist. Two of three oncologists indicated they did not have enough knowledge to answer questions from patients regarding HS, and 59% had not received any education about the topic. Physician factors associated with having initiated discussions with patients about the use of HS included female sex, higher self-reported knowledge, prior education about HS, increased knowledge about HS adverse effects and interactions, and estimating that > 40% of one's patients with cancer use HS. Fewer than one half of oncologists are initiating discussions with patients about HS use, and many indicate that lack of knowledge and education is a barrier to such discussions. Improving physician education about HS may facilitate more physician-patient communication about this important topic. © 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 11/2014; 32(36). DOI:10.1200/JCO.2014.55.8676 · 17.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Interval type-2 fuzzy sets (T2FSs) with interval membership grades are suitable for dealing with imprecision or uncertainties in many real-world problems. In the Interval type-2 fuzzy context, the aim of this paper is to develop an interactive signed distance-based simple additive weighting (SAW) method for solving multiple criteria group decision-making problems with linguistic ratings and incomplete preference information. This paper first formulates a group decision-making problem with uncertain linguistic variables and their transformation to interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Concerning the relative importance of multiple decision-makers and group consensus of fuzzy opinions, a procedure using hybrid averages is then employed to construct a collective decision matrix. By an appropriate extension of the classical SAW approach, this paper utilizes the concept of signed distances and establishes an integrated programming model to manage multi-criteria group decisions under the incomplete and inconsistent preference structure. Further, an interactive procedure is established for group decision making. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed methods are illustrated by a collaborative decision-making problem of patient-centered care (PCC).
    International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 09/2014; 13(05):979-1012. DOI:10.1142/S0219622014500229 · 1.89 Impact Factor
  • Source


Available from