Improving the Rates of Inpatient Pneumococcal Vaccination: Impact of Standing Orders Versus Computerized Reminders to Physicians •

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 4.18). 11/2004; 25(11):904-7. DOI: 10.1086/502317
Source: PubMed


To determine the impact of interventions using standing orders and computerized reminders to physicians on inpatient pneumococcal vaccination rates relative to a control group.
Open trial of the following approaches, each on a different ward: (1) standing orders for vaccination of eligible consenting patients, (2) computerized reminders to physicians, and (3) usual practice.
Four hundred twenty-four patients were admitted to three 30-bed inpatient medical wards during a 4-month period in 1999 at one hospital. Unvaccinated patients 65 years or older and competent to give oral consent were included.
A pharmacist activated a standing orders protocol for vaccination of all eligible consenting patients on one ward and computerized reminders to physicians on a second ward. A third ward served as a control group.
Forty-two patients met inclusion criteria and accepted vaccination in the standing orders arm versus 35 patients in the computerized reminder arm. Vaccination rates on the standing orders ward included 98% of those eligible and accepting vaccination, 73% of eligible patients, and 28% of all patients admitted. Rates on the computerized reminder ward were 23%, 15%, and 7%, respectively. All of the rates from the standing orders ward were significantly greater than those from the computerized reminder ward (P < .0001). Only 0.6% of all patients on the control arm were vaccinated.
Although both interventions were effective in increasing inpatient pneumococcal vaccination rates relative to baseline practice, physician independent initiation of standing orders was clearly more effective.

Download full-text


Available from: Brian Currie, Jul 30, 2014
  • Source
    • "Operational interventions may be necessary to increase syphilis testing rates. For example, standing orders for pneumococcal vaccine are more effective at increasing rates of vaccination compared to usual practice, even more so than computerized reminders [25]. There is a growing body of research which suggests that clinic-based interventions can be effective in improving syphilis screening coverage, frequency, and case detection among HIV-positive MSM [26-29]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Since 2000, reported syphilis cases increased ten-fold in Canada, particularly among men who have sex with men (MSM) co-infected with HIV. We characterized temporal patterns of of syphilis testing in a large cohort of HIV patients in Ontario, Canada. Methods We analyzed data from a multi-site cohort of people in HIV care from 2000 to 2009. Data were obtained from medical charts, interviews and record linkage with the syphilis test database at the Public Health Ontario Laboratories. We estimated the proportion that had syphilis testing at least once per year and the period and annual prevalence of reactive tests. Results Among 4232 participants, the annual proportion tested rose from 2.7% (95%CI 1.9, 3.5) in 2000 to 54.6% (95%CI 52.9, 56.3) in 2009. Testing was most common for participants who were men who have sex with men (MSM), aged <30, recently diagnosed with HIV, were antiretroviral treatment naive, had routine HIV lab testing at least twice in that year, or tested for syphilis in the preceding year. The proportion with at least one reactive test in 2000–09 was 21.0% (95%CI 19.4, 22.7) for MSM, 5.3% (95%CI 3.3, 7.4) for non-MSM males, and 2.6% (95%CI 1.2, 4.0) for women. Among MSM, the annual prevalence of reactive syphilis tests with high RPR titre (≥1:16) peaked at 3.8% in 2009. Conclusions The burden of syphilis co-infection rose considerably among HIV-positive MSM, such that by 2009, at least 1 in 5 men had laboratory evidence of current or past infection. Interventions may be needed to boost syphilis testing to achieve goals set by guidelines even in settings with universal health care.
    BMC Infectious Diseases 05/2013; 13(1):246. DOI:10.1186/1471-2334-13-246 · 2.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Industrial processing today shows a trend toward increasing complexity and automtion. This often implies for the human operator a role mainly as supervisor over a large set of monitoring instruments. A fundamental difficulty arises in emergency situations: the amount of information that the monitoring instruments may present to the operator can be overwhelming. There may be hundreds of plant variables competing for the operator's attention. As a result, the performance of the human operator can become degraded in emergency situations. Automatic prioritization of the information is needd to assist the operator. This paper discusses sophisticated approaches for accomplishing such prioritization.

  • Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 12/2004; 25(11):901-3. DOI:10.1086/502316 · 4.18 Impact Factor
Show more