Surgical management of primary hyperpara- thyroidism: the case for giving up quick intraoperative PTH assay in favor of routine PTH measurement the morning after

Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Hospital C. Huriez, rue Michel Polonovski, 59037 Lille, France.
Annals of Surgery (Impact Factor: 8.33). 01/2005; 240(6):949-53; discussion 953-4.
Source: PubMed


To analyze the utility of quick intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) measurement in the surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism.
The use of intraoperative PTH monitoring is well established in the surgery of primary hyperparathyroidism. However, some false-negative predictions lead to unnecessary explorations; furthermore, surgeons are becoming increasingly dependent on hormone measurement for intraoperative decisions, which raises concerns about the cost-effectiveness of the method.
A retrospective analysis of 268 neck explorations performed for primary hyperparathyroidism using intraoperative PTH monitoring from April 2001 to February 2003 was done. We used the criterion of "biologic recovery" of hyperfunctioning tissue, defined as a more than 50% decrease in PTH level from baseline value at 5 minutes after excision to predict the outcome of successful parathyroidectomy documented by normal postoperative serum calcium level. Additionally, we also sampled PTH at 10 minutes, 30 minutes, and the morning after surgery to compare the predictive value of delayed sampling. Patients were classified according to the prediction being concordant or discordant with the outcome. The data were analyzed using a 2 x 2 table construct for each of the sampling times, therefore providing sequential sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy of the predictions.
Concordance or overall accuracy of prediction (true positives and negatives) was obtained in 229 cases (85.4%), and discordance or failure of prediction (false positives and negatives) was obtained in 34 cases (12.7%) at T5. On analyzing the iPTH prediction at T10, T30, and D1 among the group of 33 false negatives, we found that 28 (10.4%) patients reached the concordance at 30 minutes, while by the first day 32 patients (12.3%) had achieved concordance. Thus, there was a progressive increase in sensitivity and overall accuracy, but more importantly, in the negative predictive value reaching 88.9% on the day after surgery.
The method of sampling PTH intraoperatively at 5 minutes has a high positive predictive value (99.5%) but a low negative predictive value (19.5%), which can lead to unnecessary explorations and a delay in the operative procedure. The negative predictive value increases substantially at 30 minutes and is best on the day after surgery. We suggest giving up the intraoperative measurement of PTH to adopt the first day postoperative measurement of PTH as a predictor of successful parathyroidectomy.

Download full-text


Available from: Paul Mazhuvanchary Jacob, Jun 30, 2014
8 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) for primary hyperparathyroidism is gaining acceptance as a useful tool in the armamentarium of the endocrine surgeon. We undertook an audit of 154 consecutive cases of parathyroidectomy carried out through bilateral neck exploration as well as a minimally invasive approach. Bilateral neck exploration had a 100% single operation cure rate. MIP had a 90% cure rate. Sestamibi localization had a positive predictive value of 99% for identifying an abnormal parathyroid gland. However, it performed poorly in the presence of multiglandular disease, resulting in these patients being at risk of having persistent hyperparathyroidism and therefore requiring a second operation. Our results with bilateral neck exploration are favourable compared with other large series. However, we have reported a 10% reoperation rate with MIP. Although not ideal, we are confident that, as a result of improvements based on this audit and with increasing experience, the cure rate will improve to reach international benchmarks. As such we feel that this strategy is a pragmatic way to offer MIP to patients in our region.
    ANZ Journal of Surgery 01/2007; 77(1-2):24-6. DOI:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03755.x · 1.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) involves scan-directed removal of a single adenoma through a 2.0-cm mini-incision without intraoperative monitoring. The aim of this study was to analyse the outcomes of MIP using such a simplified technique. The study group comprised 500 consecutive patients undergoing MIP via a lateral mini-incision from August 2000 to September 2005. Levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured after operation solely to aid informed discharge. Some 97.4 per cent of patients were initially cured by MIP. Eight patients remained hypercalcaemic and a further five were normocalcaemic on the day after surgery but became hypercalcaemic again within 3 months of the procedure. Eleven of these patients were cured with subsequent re-exploration. Analysis of postoperative PTH data indicated that, at best, the use of intraoperative PTH measurement during surgery would have increased the cure rate by only a further 1 per cent. Three (0.6 per cent) of 500 patients had permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy after MIP. MIP performed by the lateral focused mini-incision technique, without the use of intraoperative PTH monitoring, is a safe and effective procedure that results in outcomes equal to those of bilateral neck exploration.
    British Journal of Surgery 03/2007; 94(3):315-9. DOI:10.1002/bjs.5608 · 5.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay (IOPTH) is often used during minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). However, several investigators have reported conflicting outcomes, throwing doubt on the real influence of this adjunct on surgical decision-making. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of routine use of IOPTH on the success rate of MIP as the primary outcome, and whether it value-added to surgical decision-making during the operations at our institution. The results of MIP were determined on postoperative follow-up in 177 consecutive patients with pHPT and compared with the results of preoperative imaging, findings at surgery and the value-added accuracy of IOPTH in surgical decisions. All 177 patients had biochemically documented pHPT and all were referred for first-time surgery. Group 1 patients (n = 62) underwent a unilateral neck exploration (UNE) without IOPTH, and group 2 patients (n = 115) underwent MIP (either video-assisted or open) with IOPTH. The primary outcome was the cure rate, whereas the secondary outcome was the value-adding of IOPTH to surgical decision-making during MIP. Of the group 1 vs. 2 patients, 57/62 (91.9%) vs. 114/115 (99.1%) were cured (P = 0.01). Five (8.1%) of the group 1 patients were hypercalcaemic postoperatively, owing to an additional, overlooked, hyperfunctioning parathyroid gland, whereas among the 115 group 2 patients, 104 (90.4%) underwent resection of a single parathyroid adenoma, met the Miami criterion, and were cured. The remaining 11 (9.6%) patients did not have an adequate reduction in parathyroid hormone levels and underwent further neck exploration, with resection of additional hyperfunctioning parathyroids in nine of them. One group 2 patient was not cured. However, a decrease of less than 50% of intraoperative parathyroid hormone (iPTH) assay correctly identified the risk of persistent disease in that patient. Another patient in group 2 had a false-negative IOPTH result. The value-added accuracy of IOPTH (correct assay-based surgeon's decision of further neck exploration) was demonstrated in 3 of 78 group 2 patients with concordant results of both imaging studies vs. 7 of 37 group 2 patients with only one positive imaging study, or 3.8 vs. 18.9% of patients (P = 0.007). Routine use of IOPTH significantly improves cure rates of MIP in comparison to open image-guided UNE without IOPTH. It is a valuable adjunct in surgical decision-making, allowing for intraoperative recognition and resection of additional hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue missed by preoperative imaging studies. IOPTH offers substantial value-adding to surgical decision-making, particularly in patients with only one positive imaging study result, and significantly improves the success rate of MIP in these patients. However, in patients with concordant results of two imaging studies, the assay offers significantly lower value-adding to surgical decisions, as a vast majority of patients are cured after removal of a two-image-indexed parathyroid lesion. Despite this, we strongly advocate routine use of IOPTH in all patients undergoing MIP, as this adjunct offers maximum safety for the patient and confidence for the surgeon.
    Clinical Endocrinology 07/2007; 66(6):878-85. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02827.x · 3.46 Impact Factor
Show more