A Hemolysis-hemagglutination assay for characterizing constitutive innate humoral immunity in wild and domestic birds

Department of Biology, University of Missouri, 8001 Natural Bridge Road, St Louis, MO 63121-4499, USA.
Developmental & Comparative Immunology (Impact Factor: 2.82). 02/2005; 29(3):275-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2004.07.006
Source: PubMed


Methods to assess immunocompetence requiring only a single sample are useful in comparative studies where practical considerations prevent holding or recapturing individuals. The assay for natural antibody-mediated complement activation and red blood cell agglutination described here, requiring approximately 100 microl of blood, is highly repeatable. The effects of complement deactivation, 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME), age, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sickness response were examined to validate comparisons among diverse avian species. Complement deactivation by heating significantly reduces lysis and treatment with 2-ME reduces both lysis and agglutination. Lysis and agglutination both increase with age in chickens; LPS treatment does not influence these variables in 11-week-old chickens. In a comparison of 11 species, both lysis (0.0-5.3 titers) and agglutination (1.8-8.0 titers) vary significantly among species. Accordingly, this assay can be used to compare constitutive innate humoral immunity among species and with respect to age, sex, and experimental treatments within populations.

Download full-text


Available from: Kevin D Matson,
  • Source
    • "SRBCs were washed four times as previously described and re-suspended in 0.1 % PBS (Matson et al. 2005). "

    Polar Biology 08/2015; DOI:10.1007/s00300-015-1766-0 · 1.59 Impact Factor
    • "To estimate innate humoral immunity, we measured the bacterial killing capacity (BKC) of plasma using a bacterial strain (Escherichia coli ATCC#8739) for which killing is primarily complement mediated (Demas et al. 2011). In addition, we used a HA assay to quantify levels of NAbs (Matson, Ricklefs & Klasing 2005). To estimate acquired humoral immunity, we used the same HA assay to measure antibody (Ab) production after an in vivo challenge with CRBCs, by comparing the difference in HA score pre-and post-challenge (anti- CRBC Abs). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anthropogenic disturbances involving land use change, climate disruption, pollution, and invasive species have been shown to impact immune function of wild animals. These immune changes have direct impacts on the fitness of impacted animals and, also, potentially indirect effects on other species and on ecological processes, notably involving the spread of infectious disease. Here, we investigate whether the selective loss of large wildlife can also drive changes in immune function of other consumer species.Using a long-standing large-scale exclosure experiment in East Africa, we investigated the effects of selective removal of large wildlife on multiple measures of immune function in the dominant small rodent in the system, the East African pouched mouse, Saccostomus mearnsi.We find support for a general increase in immune function in landscapes where large wildlife has been removed, but with some variation across immune parameters. These changes may be mediated in part by increased pathogen pressure in plots where large wildlife has been removed due to major increases in rodent density in such plots, but other factors such as changes in food resources are also likely involved.Overall, our research reveals that the elimination of large-bodied wildlife –now recognized as another major form of global anthropogenic change– may have cascading effects on immune health, with the potential for these effects to also impact disease dynamics in ecological communities.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Functional Ecology 08/2015; DOI:10.1111/1365-2435.12542 · 4.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Half scores were recorded when SRBC precipitated partially but not to the extent of control wells. Lysis of erythrocytes was not scored since this process has been shown to be subjective (Matson et al., 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stress is typically characterized as "acute" (lasting from minutes to hours) or "chronic" (lasting from days to months). These terms are of limited use as they are inconsistently used and only encompass one aspect of the stressor (duration). Short and long duration stress are generally thought to produce specific outcomes (e.g. acute stress enhances while chronic stress suppresses immune function). We propose that aspects of stress other than duration, such as frequency and intensity, are important in determining its outcome. We experimentally manipulated duration, frequency, and intensity of application of exogenous corticosterone, CORT, in Sceloporus undulatus (Eastern fence lizards) and measured the immune outcomes. Our findings reveal that immune outcomes of stress are not easily predicted from the average amount or duration of CORT elevation, but that intensity plays an important role. Although three of our treatments received the same average amount of CORT, they produced different effects on immune outcomes (hemagglutination). As predicted by the literature, short-duration exposure to low-dose CORT enhanced hemagglutination; however, short-duration exposure to high-dose CORT suppressed hemagglutination, suggesting that stressor intensity affects immune outcomes of stress. While both are traditionally termed "acute' based on duration, these treatments produced different immune outcomes. Long-duration ("chronic") exposure to CORT did not produce the expected suppression of hemagglutination. Frequency of CORT application did not alter immune outcomes at low intensities. These results highlight the need to quantify more than just the duration of a stressor if we are to understand and manage the ecological consequences of stress. Specifically, we should consider stressor frequency and intensity, as well as duration, for a more complete characterization and understanding of stress. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    General and Comparative Endocrinology 07/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.07.008 · 2.47 Impact Factor
Show more