Article

The effect of fasting practice on sedation with chloral hydrate

Pediatric Anesthesia Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel 52621.
Pediatric emergency care (Impact Factor: 0.92). 01/2005; 20(12):805-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.pec.0000148027.53598.b8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Infants undergo various painless imaging procedures frequently. Mild sedation is required in such cases to reduce anxiety as well as to ensure optimal performance of the procedure. The most frequently used sedative as a single drug is chloral hydrate. The issue of preprocedural fasting is a subject of contention. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)/American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) fasting practice guidelines on the efficacy and success of the sedation with chloral hydrate.
The sedation records of 200 infants from 2 hospitals who underwent auditory brainstem response for evaluation of hearing loss were evaluated retrospectively. In the first hospital (group A), strict nulla per os (NPO) guidelines were followed in accordance with the guidelines published by the AAP/ASA, whereas in the second hospital (group B), no fasting period was required. All children were premedicated with chloral hydrate. We evaluated the sedation failure rate, total dose of chloral hydrate needed, adverse effects, overall sleep time, and time to discharge.
The average fasting period as expected was significantly longer in group A patients than in group B patients (5.7 +/- 1.7 vs. 2 +/- 0.2 hours; P < 0.001). Group A patients demonstrated a significantly higher failure rate to achieve sedation with the first dose of chloral hydrate compared with group B patients (21% vs.11%; P = 0.03), hence needing higher doses (83 +/- 31 vs. 61 +/- 21 mg/kg; P < 0.01), and were sedated for longer periods (103 +/- 42 vs. 73 +/- 48 minutes; P < 0.001) and discharged later. No difference was found in the adverse effect rate.
Fasting was associated with an increased failure rate of the initial sedation. As a consequence, an increased total dose of chloral hydrate was required inducing a prolonged sedation time. Presumably, this is a result of the fact that a hungry child is irritable and therefore more difficult to sedate.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Ilan Keidan, Aug 14, 2015
3 Followers
 · 
240 Views
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this controlled-crossover study was to determine the frequency of vomiting during nitrous oxide / oxygen analgesia (NOA) and assess the relationship between fasting status and vomiting. One hundred and thirteen children (64 male, 49 female), ranging in age from 24-160 months (mean = 74) and a mean weight of 23 kg (range 11-60 kg), participated in the study. At the initial examination, subjects were randomly assigned to be either fasting on the first appointment and non-fasting during the second appointment or alternatively be non-fasting for the first appointment and fasting for the second. The average time interval between eating and treatment in the fasting sessions was 6 hours and in the non-fasting group, 1 hour before treatment. Vomiting occurred in only one subject, immediately after cessation of treatment resulting in a frequency of 1% of subjects or 0.5% of sessions. No other differences were found between fasting and non-fasting subjects. During dental treatment with NOA using the rapid induction method, constant nonfluctuating concentration/ flow, and treatment time of under 35 minutes, the frequency of vomiting during NOA was found to be 0.5%.
    Pediatric dentistry 30(5):414-9. · 0.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Emergency physicians frequently administer procedural sedation and analgesia to nonfasted patients; however, they currently have no specific guidelines to aid them in preprocedural risk stratification. We assembled a committee of leading emergency physician sedation researchers to develop a consensus-based clinical practice advisory for this purpose. Our goal was to create a tool to permit emergency physicians to identify prudent limits of sedation depth and timing in light of fasting status and individual patient risk factors. The advisory is not intended to assert a legal standard of practice or absolute requirement. It is expected that emergency physicians will at times appropriately deviate from it according to individualized judgment and unique clinical circumstances.
    Annals of emergency medicine 05/2007; 49(4):454-61. DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.017 · 4.33 Impact Factor
Show more