Surveillance and modelling of HIV, STI, and risk behaviours in concentrated HIV epidemics.

Family Health International, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Sexually Transmitted Infections (Impact Factor: 3.08). 01/2005; 80 Suppl 2:ii57-62. DOI: 10.1136/sti.2004.011916
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT HIV epidemics in most countries are highly concentrated among population subgroups such as female sex workers, injecting drug users, men who have sex with men, mobile populations, and their sexual partners. The perception that they are important only when they cause epidemic expansion to general populations has obscured a critical lack of coverage of preventive interventions in these groups, as well as appropriate methods for monitoring epidemic and behavioural risk trends. The difficulties in accessing such groups have likewise often cast doubt on the representativeness of observed disease and behavioural risk estimates and their validity and reliability, particularly those related to sampling and the measurement of risk behaviours.
To review methodological obstacles in conducting surveillance with population subgroups in concentrated HIV epidemics, elaborate on recent advancements that partially overcome these obstacles, and illustrate the importance of modelling integrated HIV, STI, and behavioural surveillance data.
Review of published HIV, STI, and behavioural surveillance data, research on epidemic dynamics, and case studies from selected countries.
The population subgroups that merit regular and systematic surveillance in concentrated epidemics are best determined through extensive assessment and careful definition. Adherence to recently refined chain referral and time location sampling methods can help to ensure more representative samples. Finally, because of the inherent limitations of cross sectional surveys in understanding associations between complex sexual behaviours and HIV and STI transmission, mathematical models using multiple year data offer opportunities for integrated analysis of behavioural change and HIV/STI trends.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction:Genital ulcerative diseases are a major public health problem. The advert of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS over the past 25 years has deepened the scope of morbidity, mortality, and various forms of clinical presentations of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).Materials and Methods:A total of 50 cases having Genital ulcerative diseases and STD reporting to STD clinic during the period of the year from November 2005 to December 2006 were included and detailed history and clinical examination were carried out and provisional diagnosis is made. Laboratory confirmation of clinically diagnosed cases was done using laboratory tests such as S. HIV, venereal disease research laboratory, Tzanck smear, gram stain, and Giemsa stain.Result:In the present study, the incidence of herpes progenitalis was (38%) followed by primary syphilis (32%), chancroid (26%), lymphogranuloma venereum (02%), and genital scabies (02%). HIV sero-positivity was detected in 12% (n = 6) cases.Conclusion:HIV was found to be more common among genital ulcer disease patients, especially syphilis and genital herpes.
    Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and AIDS 04/2014; 35(1):59-61. DOI:10.4103/0253-7184.132434
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aims: Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is increasingly being used to sample hidden populations, such as people who inject drugs (PWIDs). This study compared samples of PWID recruited from RDS and service-based sampling methods to explore whether RDS captured a less visible group of PWID that differed in their risk profile than those captured using service-based sampling. Methods: An RDS study of PWID was conducted in Sydney, Australia in 2009. RDS participants’ frequency of use of NSP and pharmacies was calculated. Population estimates were calculated for RDS participant characteristics and were compared with sample proportions from two separate studies, which recruited participants from needle and syringe programmes (NSP) and pharmacies. Findings: Only 12% of the RDS sample may not have been accessible through either an NSP or a pharmacy. RDS participants were just as risky in their injecting practices and were more likely to access HCV prevention services than participants recruited from service-based sampling methods. Conclusions: This comparison was useful in evaluating who might be missed in service-based sampling methods. Given that RDS was not able to capture a less visible group of PWID, the choice of sampling method should take into account the availability of services through which to conduct a study.
    Drugs: Education Prevention and Policy 06/2012; 19(4). DOI:10.3109/09687637.2011.631198 · 0.53 Impact Factor


Available from