Human sound localization at near-threshold levels.

Central Systems Laboratory, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, 1301 E. Ann Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0506, USA.
Hearing Research (Impact Factor: 2.85). 02/2005; 199(1-2):124-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.08.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Physiological studies of spatial hearing show that the spatial receptive fields of cortical neurons typically are narrow at near-threshold levels, broadening at moderate levels. The apparent loss of neuronal spatial selectivity at increasing sound levels conflicts with the accurate performance of human subjects localizing at moderate sound levels. In the present study, human sound localization was evaluated across a wide range of sensation levels, extending down to the detection threshold. Listeners reported whether they heard each target sound and, if the target was audible, turned their heads to face the apparent source direction. Head orientation was tracked electromagnetically. At near-threshold levels, the lateral (left/right) components of responses were highly variable and slightly biased towards the midline, and front vertical components consistently exhibited a strong bias towards the horizontal plane. Stimulus levels were specified relative to the detection threshold for a front-positioned source, so low-level rear targets often were inaudible. As the sound level increased, first lateral and then vertical localization neared asymptotic levels. The improvement of localization over a range of increasing levels, in which neural spatial receptive fields presumably are broadening, indicates that sound localization does not depend on narrow spatial receptive fields of cortical neurons.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One of the principal auditory disabilities associated with older age is difficulty in locating and tracking sources of sound. This study investigated whether these difficulties are associated with deterioration in the representation of space in the auditory cortex. In psychophysical tests, half of a group of older (>60 years) adults displayed spatial acuity similar to that of young adults throughout the frontal horizontal plane. The remaining half had considerably poorer spatial acuity at the more peripheral regions of frontal space. Computational modeling of electroencephalographic responses to abrupt location shifts demonstrated marked differences in the spatial tuning of populations of cortical neurons between the older adults with poor spatial acuity on the one hand, and those with good spatial acuity, as well as young adults, on the other hand. In those with poor spatial acuity, cortical responses contained little information with which to distinguish peripheral locations. We demonstrate a clear link between neural responses and spatial acuity measured behaviorally, and provide evidence for age-related changes in the coding of horizontal space.
    Neurobiology of aging 10/2013; 35(3). DOI:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.08.033 · 4.85 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: How does the brain accomplish sound localization with invariance to total sound level? Sensitivity to interaural level differences (ILD) is first computed at the lateral superior olive (LSO) and is observed in multiple auditory regions, including inferior colliculus (ICC) and auditory cortex. In the LSO, this ILD sensitivity is level-dependent, such that ILD response functions shift towards the ipsilateral (excitatory) ear with increasing sound level. Thus changes in firing rate could indicate either changes in sound location or level, or both. In ICC, while ILD responses can shift toward either ear in individual neurons, there is no net ILD response shift at the population level. In human behavioral studies, ILD sensitivity is invariant to sound level, suggesting a transformation in level-sensitivity between the LSO and perception of sound sources. Whether this transformation is completed in ICC, or continues at higher levels, remains unclear. It also remains unknown whether perceptual sound localization is level-invariant in rats, as in humans. Here we asked whether ILD sensitivity is level-invariant in rat auditory cortex, using both single-unit and whole-cell recordings. Surprisingly, we found that with increasing sound levels, ILD responses shifted towards the ipsilateral ear (which is typically inhibitory), regardless of whether the cells preferred ipsilateral, contralateral, or binaural stimuli. Voltage-clamp recordings suggest that synaptic inhibition does not contribute substantially to this transformation in level sensitivity. We conclude that the level invariance of ILD sensitivity seen in behavioral studies is not present in the rat auditory cortex.
    Journal of Neurophysiology 12/2013; 111(5). DOI:10.1152/jn.00648.2013 · 3.04 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: to compare the sound localization performance of hearing aids users, with the performance of normal hearing in the horizontal and sagittal planes, at 0.5, 2 and 4.5 Hz; to correlate the correct responses in sound localization tasks and the use time of hearing aids. METHODS: eight normal hearing subjects and 20 hearing aid users were tested, subdivided into groups of 10 in-the-canal (ITC) hearing aid users and 10 behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aid users. All subjects were tested with a sound localization device which had three types of square waves with fundamental frequencies at 0.5 kHz, 2 kHz and 4.5 kHz, at 70 dBA. RESULTS: the rate of correct responses in sound localization tasks was 78.4%, 72.2% and 72.9% for normal hearing subjects, at 0.5 kHz, 2 kHz and 4.5 kHz, respectively, and 40.1%, 39.4%, and 41.7% for hearing aid users. As for the types of hearing aids, users of ITC type hit the correctly sound localization in 47.2% and user of BTE type in 37.4%. CONCLUSION: normal hearing subjects locate sound sources more efficiently than hearing aid users, and among these, those using the ITC type obtained better performance. Moreover, the time of use does not interfere with the performance for locating the sound sources.
    Revista CEFAC 06/2010; 12(3):377-383.