A neurogenomics approach to gene expression analysis in the developing brain.

Department of Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, United States.
Molecular Brain Research (Impact Factor: 2). 01/2005; 132(2):116-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.10.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Secreted and transmembrane proteins provide critical functions in the signaling networks essential for neurogenesis. We used a genetic signal sequence gene trap approach to isolate 189 genes expressed during development in e16.5 whole head, e16.5 hippocampus and e14.5 cerebellum. Gene ontology programs were used to classify the genes into respective biological processes. Four major classes of biological processes known to be important during development were identified: cell communication, cell physiology processes, metabolism and morphogenesis. We used in situ hybridization to determine the temporal and spatial patterns of gene expression in the developing brain using this set of probes. The results demonstrate that gene expression patterns can highlight potential gene functions in specific brain regions. We propose that combining bioinformatics with the gene expression pattern is an effective strategy to identify genes that may play critical roles during brain development.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The comorbidity of disorders, though it is an extremely common phenomenon, remains unexplained. Among the developmental disorders that are most often diagnosed together are dyslexia and ADHD. The goal of this book is to present a neuropsychological analysis of memory deficits among children with concomitant dyslexia and ADHD. Assuming the perspective of development neuropsychology, the book presents contemporary theoretical perspectives on the specific nature of the double diagnosis of dyslexia and ADHD in children, and general models of the comorbidity of disturbances. This is followed by a discussion of the processes and models of memory from a neuropsychological perspective, with particular attention to microgenetic theory. The specific nature of memory processes in children is also described, in the course of both normal and pathological development. The empirical section of the book presents the results of the author’s own research on memory deficits, as well as their cognitive moderators - attention, language, executive functions, and cognitive style - in four research groups of pupils in the 4th to 6th year of primary school: dyslexic children (n = 60), ADHD (n = 60), both together (n = 60), and children without disturbances as background (n = 60). Carefully chosen methods for evaluating memory were applied, and indicated the occurrence of problems in respect to verbal, visual, and visuospatial memory among all the children from the three clinical groups. Although analysis showed some differences between them, the differentiation is not markedly specific. When the deficits found among the children from the criterial group, i.e. with the double diagnosis, are compared, it turned out that their memory problems are primarily a factor of dyslexia and ADHD, and not something qualitatively unique, i.e. they do not constitute a new, specific symptom. These research results made it possible to differentiate the moderators of memory that are characteristics for each of the clinical groups: 1. In children with ADHD alone, the axial moderators proved to be attention and executive functions; 2. in children with dyslexia, the moderators affecting verbal memory turned out to be language functions, while in respect to visual and visuospatial memory, this role was played primarily by attention; 3. among the children from the criterial group, i.e. with concomitant dyslexia and ADHD, the moderators proved to be attention, language functions, and executive functions. The results presented here are fully consistent with the microgenetic model of the formation of the symptom. The formation of the symptom in children with dyslexia, with ADHD, and with both disorders can constitute a bridge connecting all neurodevelopmental disorders. Beginning with common, non-specific mutations, through distributed differences in the development of brain structures and non-specific symptoms in early childhood, to proximate disturbances of cognitive functions in children with fully symptomatic disturbances, we can observe the visible formation of a common symptom, which consists in the combination of the symptoms of two disorders. Microgenetic theory completes the concept of proximate etiology as a model for double diagnosis. This is the theoretical foundation that allows for a full understanding of the mechanism of comorbidity of neurodevelopmental disorders. The monograph concludes with a summary of the research results, which verify the microgenetic theory of symptom formation, and the development of the author’s own neuropsychological model of memory disturbances in children with a double diagnosis, based on that theory. Directions for further research are indicated. This microgenetic interpretation of the comorbidity of dyslexia and ADHD constitutes the first such attempt, not only in Poland, but in the world.
    01/2011; Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar., ISBN: 978-83-7383-561-0
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Kohlschütter-Tönz Syndrome (KTZS) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the ROGDI gene. This syndrome is characterized by epilepsy, psychomotor regression and amelogenesis imperfecta. In this paper, we report a case of a 13-year-old Malian girl presenting with this rare disease. By genetic analysis, we identified a novel ROGDI homozygous mutation NM_024589.1: c.117+1G>T [Chr16 (GRCh37): g.4852382C>A] which confirmed the diagnosis of Kohlschütter-Tönz syndrome. The mutation abolishes the usual splice donor site of intron 2 which leads to the deletion of exon 2 and in-frame assembly of exon 3. Exon 2 encodes a highly conserved leucine-rich region that is essential for ROGDI protein function. Hence, this deletion may affect the function of the ROGDI protein. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
    Molecular syndromology 09/2014; DOI:10.1159/000366252
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Within the last decade or so, there has been an acceleration of research attempting to connect specific genetic lesions to the patterns of brain structure and activation. This article comments on observations that have been made based on these recent data and discusses their importance for the field of investigations into developmental disorders. In making these observations, the authors focus on one specific genomic lesion, the well-studied, yet still incompletely understood, 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. The authors demonstrate the degree of variability in the phenotype that occurs at both the brain and behavioral levels of genomic disorders and describe how this variability is, on close inspection, represented at the genomic level. The authors emphasize the importance of combining genetic/genomic analyses and neuroimaging for research and for future clinical diagnostic purposes and for the purposes of developing individualized, patient-tailored treatment and remediation approaches.
    Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics: JDBP 09/2010; 31(7):602-9. DOI:10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181f5a0a1 · 2.12 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 5, 2014