Article

[Morbidity after stapled haemorrhoidectomy: long-term results about 140 patients and review of the literature].

Département de chirurgie viscérale, CHU de Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49033 Angers cedex 01, France.
Annales de Chirurgie (Impact Factor: 0.52). 01/2005; 129(10):571-7.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to determine the results and the complications of the treatment of hemorrhoids with circular stapler with a follow-up of 18 months, and to review the complications in the literature.
From April 1998 to August 1999, 140 patients (83 males and 57 females) with an average age of 43.8 years (range: 19-83 years) underwent haemorrhoidectomy using a circular stapler in three university hospital centers. The degree of hemorrhoids has been classified: three cases of degree II, 97 cases of degree III, and 40 cases of degree IV. All the patients were prospectively evaluated at two weeks, two and 18 months after surgery.
The average length of the operation was 18 minutes (range: 8-60 minutes). Mean hospital stay was 36 hours (range: 8-72 hours). There was no intraoperative complication. There was no mortality. The postoperative complication rate was 7.8% (N = 11): there were five cases of bleeding that two complicated by a submucosal hematoma (one was infected and needed a rectotomy on day 21), two cases of urinary retention, and two cases of external hemorrhoid thrombosis. The bleeding occurred in the 12 hours after surgery except for one patient with antivitamin K whith presented a secondary bleeding on day 16. At 18 months, five patients presented a moderate asymptomatic stricture dilated on digital examination. Two patients complained of persistent skin tags. Neither functional trouble nor incontinence to gas, liquids, or solids was presented. With a mean follow-up of 40 months, 90% (N = 112) of the patients were fully satisfied.
Treatment of hemorrhoids with circular stapler appears to be effective with 96% of patients fully satisfied at 18 months. The morbidity rate was low, and no higher than the diathermy excision hemorrhoidectomy. The results are directly dependent on the practice that required a learning, and not on the technique itself.

0 Followers
 · 
69 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: La enfermedad hemorroidal es frecuente, pero sólo un 10% de los pacientes requiere tratamiento quirúrgico. Este último está indicado cuando fracasan o no se pueden aplicar los tratamientos farmacológicos o instrumentales. Las técnicas quirúrgicas actuales se basan en dos principios: la exéresis quirúrgica directa de los paquetes hemorroidales o la disminución del flujo sanguíneo por hemorroidopexia o ligadura de las arterias hemorroidales. Debido a que las tasas de morbilidad son comparables para las diversas técnicas, las diferencias se centran sobre todo en el dolor postoperatorio, que limita el tratamiento ambulatorio, así como en el riesgo de recidiva del prolapso hemorroidal. La elección de la técnica debe comentarse con el paciente y adaptarse de forma individual según sus expectativas (eficacia máxima/menor morbilidad). La cirugía de las hemorroides sigue siendo un procedimiento funcional, por lo que deben limitarse al máximo las complicaciones y dar prioridad al bienestar del paciente.
    11/2012; 28(4):1–16. DOI:10.1016/S1282-9129(12)63392-3
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Surgery is the most effective treatment in patients with symptomatic grade III-IV hemorrhoids who have not responded to outpatient treatment, when there is associated abnormalities (anal fissure, anal fistula, skin tags) and in thrombosed hemorrhoids. Hemorrhoidectomy is currently the “gold standard” treatment. Randomized controlled trials comparing open with closed hemorrhoidectomy show no significant differences in pain scores. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy produces less postoperative pain than hemorrhoidectomy but is less effective in terms of symptom control. No treatment is superior to others in reducing postoperative pain except the use of drugs and anesthetic techniques. In patients with prolapsed internal hemorrhoids and thrombosed hemorrhoids, treatment may initially consist of an urgent hemorrhoidectomy with the same results as those obtained with elective surgery.
    Cirugía Española 12/2005; 78:15-23. DOI:10.1016/S0009-739X(05)74639-X · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: La malattia emorroidaria è frequente, ma solo il 10% dei pazienti necessita di un trattamento chirurgico. Quest’ultimo è indicato in caso di fallimento o di impossibilità dei trattamenti farmacologici e strumentali. Le attuali tecniche chirurgiche si basano su due principi: o la rimozione diretta dei pacchetti emorroidari o la riduzione dell’afflusso ematico con emorroidopessi o legatura delle arterie emorroidarie. Dato che i tassi di morbilità sono comparabili per le varie tecniche, le differenze stanno principalmente nei dolori postoperatori, che limitano la gestione ambulatoriale, così come nei rischi di recidiva di prolasso emorroidario. La scelta della tecnica deve, quindi, essere discussa con il paziente e adattata caso per caso in funzione delle sue aspettative (efficacia massima/morbilità ridotta). La chirurgia delle emorroidi resta una chirurgia funzionale; deve, quindi, ridurre al massimo le complicanze e privilegiare il benessere del paziente.
    11/2012; 12(1):1–16. DOI:10.1016/S1636-5577(12)62668-6