Article

[Morbidity after stapled haemorrhoidectomy: long-term results about 140 patients and review of the literature].

Département de chirurgie viscérale, CHU de Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49033 Angers cedex 01, France.
Annales de Chirurgie (Impact Factor: 0.35). 01/2005; 129(10):571-7.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to determine the results and the complications of the treatment of hemorrhoids with circular stapler with a follow-up of 18 months, and to review the complications in the literature.
From April 1998 to August 1999, 140 patients (83 males and 57 females) with an average age of 43.8 years (range: 19-83 years) underwent haemorrhoidectomy using a circular stapler in three university hospital centers. The degree of hemorrhoids has been classified: three cases of degree II, 97 cases of degree III, and 40 cases of degree IV. All the patients were prospectively evaluated at two weeks, two and 18 months after surgery.
The average length of the operation was 18 minutes (range: 8-60 minutes). Mean hospital stay was 36 hours (range: 8-72 hours). There was no intraoperative complication. There was no mortality. The postoperative complication rate was 7.8% (N = 11): there were five cases of bleeding that two complicated by a submucosal hematoma (one was infected and needed a rectotomy on day 21), two cases of urinary retention, and two cases of external hemorrhoid thrombosis. The bleeding occurred in the 12 hours after surgery except for one patient with antivitamin K whith presented a secondary bleeding on day 16. At 18 months, five patients presented a moderate asymptomatic stricture dilated on digital examination. Two patients complained of persistent skin tags. Neither functional trouble nor incontinence to gas, liquids, or solids was presented. With a mean follow-up of 40 months, 90% (N = 112) of the patients were fully satisfied.
Treatment of hemorrhoids with circular stapler appears to be effective with 96% of patients fully satisfied at 18 months. The morbidity rate was low, and no higher than the diathermy excision hemorrhoidectomy. The results are directly dependent on the practice that required a learning, and not on the technique itself.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
63 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stapled haemorrhoidopexy is a well recognized alternative to haemorrhoidectomy, and is associated with reduced pain and earlier return to normal activity. This paper reports all published cases of life-threatening sepsis following stapled haemorrhoidopexy, identifies causative factors and makes recommendations. A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching the major electronic databases. All relevant references were reviewed for possible inclusion. All references of the relevant articles were screened for any further articles that were not identified in the initial search. From 2000 to the present, 29 articles reporting complications in 40 patients were identified. Thirty-five patients underwent laparotomy with faecal diversion and a further patient was treated by low anterior resection. A specific complication was rectal perforation with peritonitis. Factors that led to life-threatening sepsis were identified in 30 patients. Despite surgical treatment and resuscitation, there were four deaths. Severe sepsis can complicate stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Rectal perforation and peritonitis are a particular risk of this technique and the associated mortality rate is high.
    British Journal of Surgery 03/2012; 99(6):746-53. · 4.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: HintergrundDie Studie wurde veranlasst, um die Risiken der chirurgischen Klammernahtinstrumente zu bewerten. MethodenIn den Jahren 2002 bis 2007 wurden 165 Meldungen zu Vorkommnissen oder korrektiven Maßnahmen von drei Herstellern registriert und retrospektiv auf die häufigsten Erscheinungsbilder der Produktfehler, die Herstelleruntersuchungsergebnisse und den Schweregrad der Patientenfolgen analysiert. ErgebnisseSchwerwiegende Patientenfolgen ereigneten sich in nur 35,2%. In den meisten Fällen resultierte kein Patientenschaden durch die gemeldete Fehlfunktion, und die Untersuchungen ergaben keinen Produktfehler (52,7%). SchlussfolgerungDie chirurgischen Klammernahtinstrumente sind überwiegend sicher in der Anwendung in der Thorax- und abdominellen Chirurgie. Die Vorkommnisberichte sind wichtig für die Risikobewertung und Verbesserung der Klammernahtinstrumente. BackgroundThe study was initiated to evaluate the risks of surgical staplers. MethodsIn the years 2002–2007, a total of 165 reports of incidents or corrective actions from 3 manufacturers were registered and retrospectively analyzed with respect to the prevalent product default appearance, the results of the manufacturer’s investigations and the severity of the consequences for patient. ResultsSevere patient consequences occurred in only 35.2%. In the majority of the cases no patient injury resulted from the reported malfunction and the investigations revealed no product error (52.7%). ConclusionThe surgical staplers are predominantly safe for application in thoracic and abdominal surgery. The incident reports are important for risk assessment and improvement of the surgical staplers.
    Der Chirurg 01/2009; 80(8):735-740. · 0.52 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization (THD) and stapler haemorrhoidopexy (SH) have been demonstrated to be less painful than the Milligan-Morgan procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of THD vs SH in the treatment of third-degree haemorrhoids in an equivalent trial. One hundred and sixty-nine patients with third-degree haemorrhoids were randomized online to receive THD (n = 85) or SH (n = 84) in 10 Colorectal Units in which the staff were well trained in both techniques. The mean follow-up period was 17 (range 15-20) months. Early minor postoperative complications occurred in 30.6% of patients in the THD group and in 32.1% of patients in the SH group. Milder spontaneous pain and pain on defecation were reported in the THD group in the first postoperative week, but this was not statistically significant. Late complications were significantly higher (P = 0.028) in the SH group. Residual haemorrhoids persisted in 12 patients in the THD group and in six patients in the SH group (P = 0.14). Six patients in the SH group and 10 in the THD group underwent further treatment of haemorrhoids (P = 0.34). No differences were found in postoperative incontinence. The obstructed defecation score (ODS) was significantly higher in the SH group (P < 0.02). Improvement in quality of life was similar in both groups. Postoperative in-hospital stay was 1.14 days in the THD group and 1.31 days in the SH group (P = 0.03). Both THD and SH techniques are effective for the treatment of third-degree haemorrhoids in the medium term. THD has a better cost-effective ratio and lower (not significant) pain compared with SH. Postoperative pain and recurrence did not differ significantly between the two groups.
    Colorectal Disease 03/2011; 14(2):205-11. · 2.02 Impact Factor