The risk of ovarian cancer after breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers

Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 3H4.
Gynecologic Oncology (Impact Factor: 3.69). 02/2005; 96(1):222-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.09.039
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To estimate the risk of ovarian cancer after a primary diagnosis of breast cancer among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and to identify host and treatment-related factors that might modify the risk.
Patients were 491 women with stage I or stage II breast cancer, diagnosed from 1975 to 2000 and for whom a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation had been identified. Patients were followed from the initial diagnosis of breast cancer until either ovarian cancer, prophylactic oophorectomy, death, or 2002. The medical treatment records and pathology documents were reviewed. Information that was abstracted from the medical charts included date of breast cancer diagnosis, stage of disease, use of chemotherapy, use of radiation therapy, usage of tamoxifen, oophorectomy, recurrence, second malignancy, and vital status.
The 10-year actuarial risk of ovarian cancer after breast cancer was 12.7% for BRCA1 carriers and 6.8% for BRCA2 carriers (P = 0.03). The use of tamoxifen (OR = 1.79; P = 0.16) and chemotherapy (OR = 0.59; P = 0.15) did not significantly impact on the risk of subsequent ovarian cancer. Twenty-five percent of the deaths in women with stage I breast cancer were due to a subsequent ovarian cancer.
The high incidence of ovarian cancer suggests that oophorectomy should be recommended in female BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with a diagnosis of breast cancer, especially those with stage I disease. Breast cancer systemic therapy did not significantly alter the risk of ovarian cancer.

Download full-text


Available from: Ivo Olivotto, Aug 11, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several genes are associated with hereditary susceptibility to breast cancer. Most notably these include BRCA1 and BRCA2; however, other less common gene mutations which confer elevated breast cancer risk are associated with Cowden syndrome, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, ataxia-telangiectasia heterozygosity and hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. In this article we highlight the genetic epidemiology, gene function, genotype-phenotype correlations, cancer risks and clinicopathologic findings for the cancer susceptibility genes related to these syndromes. We also examine genes, such as CHEK2, which confer a lower penetrance for breast cancer in comparison to these highly penetrant genes.
    Breast disease 27:21-50.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Women at high risk for breast cancer are often also at high risk for ovarian cancer, reflecting similar risk factors and suggesting intertwined disease pathways and common prevention targets. A novel strategy to overcome obstacles in preventing ovarian neoplasia (low incidence, lack of specific disease markers, and difficulties in tissue sampling), the deadliest gynecologic cancer, may be to develop a prevention strategy that targets breast and ovarian cancer simultaneously. Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, reduces hormone responsive breast cancer risk by 50% but its effects on risk of ovarian cancer, also hormonal responsive, are unclear. The goals of this work were to 1) develop and characterize a preclinical model of concurrent breast and ovarian cancer and 2) use this dual cancer model to examine the efficacy of tamoxifen to prevent both breast and ovarian cancer. Mammary carcinogens [7,12-dimethylbenz[α]anthracene (DMBA), N-methyl-N-nitrosourea and estradiol (Ey2)] were tested separately in combination with local ovarian DMBA administration to determine the best combined treatment to induce mammary and ovarian cancer concurrently and effectively in the rat. Results showed that systemic Ey2 and ovarian DMBA promoted the highest incidence of dysplasia in the mammary gland and ovary and elevated levels of mammary Ki-67 and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) mimicking the human disease. Next, the ability of tamoxifen to prevent mammary and ovarian cancer simultaneously was evaluated. Tamoxifen which inhibited mammary carcinogenesis and normalized levels of Ki-67 and COX-2, had no effect on (neither accelerated nor inhibited) ovarian cancer progression. In addition, carcinogen treatment increased levels of stem cell markers, Oct-4 and aldehyde dehydrogenase-1, in the mammary gland; interestingly, this expansion was not reversed by tamoxifen. Intriguingly, while examining ovaries from this study, we serendipitously discovered an apparent protective effect of tamoxifen against DMBA-induced follicular destruction and this effect was further investigated. Chemotherapy and environmental toxicants (e.g. DMBA) deplete ovarian follicles and often lead to accelerated ovarian aging and premature ovarian failure; however, there is no established treatment that can protect the ovary from these toxic insults. In vivo, rats were treated with tamoxifen and DMBA or cyclophosphamide (the most ovotoxic chemotherapy) and total numbers of follicles in the ovary were determined. In vitro, ovarian organ culture and oocyte culture were carried out to examine local effects of tamoxifen on DMBA-induced follicle loss and doxorubicin-induced oocyte fragmentation, respectively. We demonstrated for the first time that tamoxifen protects ovarian follicles against not only DMBA- but also chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin)-induced ovarian damage. Clinically, tamoxifen has already been tested for safe use as an adjuvant therapy for several cancers; therefore, if translated into clinical use, these results may have immediate impact on options for fertility preservation and quality of life in young female cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. The long term goals of this work are to 1) use the dual cancer model to screen for promising agents that decrease risks for both breast and ovarian cancer and 2) examine the mechanism by which tamoxifen inhibits toxicant-induced ovarian follicle loss.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The extent of the problem The number of cancer survivors has been increasing dramatically and is expected to keep growing in the near future. In the Netherlands, a 38% increase of cancer survivors is estimated from 2005 to 2015, representing an increase from 500,000 to 692,000 (ex-) patients in this period.1 It is well known that individuals who suffered from cancer exhibit a 20% higher risk of subsequent primary malignancies.2 Thus, as the number of cancer survivors increases, the number of patients with multiple primary cancers will increase as well. Because cancer is more frequent among the elderly, the ageing of the Dutch population will cause a further increase in the number of cases with multiple cancers: Only 5%-12% of cancer patients aged 50-64 were previously diagnosed with cancer, versus 12%-26% of those aged over 803. Other forces, including increased awareness of (second) malignancies, the higher use and sensitivity of diagnostic/detection methods, and the recent improvements in cancer treatment and survival will further lead to higher prevalence of multiple cancers. Cancer survivors who develop a second malignancy have a higher risk of dying4 and experience a worsening in their quality of life. Thus, increased interest in second cancer from the epidemiological and clinical perspective is highly relevant.
Show more