Visual search for a motion singleton among coherently moving distractors

Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, PO Box 100131, 33501, Bielefeld, Germany.
Psychological Research (Impact Factor: 2.47). 04/2006; 70(2):103-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-004-0194-5
Source: PubMed


In the current study, we tested whether search for a visual motion singleton presented among several coherently moving distractors can be more efficient than search for a motion stimulus presented with a single distractor. Under a variety of conditions, multiple spatially distributed and coherently moving distractors facilitated search for a uniquely moving target relative to a single-motion-distractor condition (Experiments 1, 3, and 4). Color coherencies among static distractors were not equally effective (Experiments 1 and 2). These results confirm that humans are highly sensitive to antagonistically directed motion signals in backgrounds compared with spatially more confined regions of visual images.

Download full-text


Available from: Ingrid Scharlau,
20 Reads
  • Source
    • "On the basis of the preemptive-control hypothesis , we also expected that the capture effect of the better matching colour singleton in a current trial is not a mere stimulus-driven consequence of whether the preceding trial's target had or had not the same colour as the present trial's nontarget singleton (cf. Horstmann & Ansorge, 2006). This expectation was confirmed in all of the experiments. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: According to the preemptive-control hypothesis, participants can specify their control settings to attend to relevant target colours or to ignore the irrelevant distractor colours in advance of the displays. Two predictions of this hypothesis were tested. First, with the control settings being specified in advance, capture by a stimulus that better matches the settings was expected to temporally precede capture by a stimulus that matches the setting less well. Second, with the control settings being specified in advance, stronger capture by the better matching than by the less matching stimulus was predicted not to be a stimulus-driven consequence of the target colour in a preceding trial. Both predictions were shown to hold true under different conditions in three experiments.
    Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 08/2007; 60(7):952-75. DOI:10.1080/17470210600822795 · 2.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Can we search for items based on their type of motion? We consider here visual search based on three types of motion: (i) ballistic motion, in which objects move in a straight line until they encounter a display boundary; (ii) random-walk motion, in which objects change direction randomly; (iii) composite motion, in which objects move with random fluctuations around a generally ballistic trajectory. The asymmetric pattern of search efficiency can be explained by assuming that visual attention is guided by processes sensitive to the presence of linear motion and change in motion. The results do not reveal a more sophisticated ability to segregate items based on the nature of their motion.
    Perception 02/2007; 36(11):1624-34. DOI:10.1068/p5683 · 0.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Under some circumstances, moving objects capture attention. Whether a change in the direction of a moving object attracts attention is still unexplored. We investigated this using a continuous tracking task. In Experiment 1, four grating patches changed smoothly and semirandomly in their positions and orientations, and observers attempted to track the orientations of two of them. After the stimuli disappeared, one of the two target gratings was queried and observers reported its orientation; hence direction of the gratings' motion across the screen was an irrelevant feature. Despite the irrelevance of its motion, when the nonqueried grating had collided with an invisible boundary within the last 200 msec of the trial, accuracy reporting the queried grating was worse than when it had not. Attention was likely drawn by the unexpected nature of these changes in direction of motion, since the effect was eliminated when the boundaries were visible (Experiment 2). This tendency for unexpected motion changes to attract attention has important consequences for the monitoring of objects in everyday environments.
    Attention Perception & Psychophysics 11/2010; 72(8):2087-95. DOI:10.3758/APP.72.8.2087 · 2.17 Impact Factor
Show more