Synaptic vesicle pools.

Max-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Göttingen, Germany.
Nature reviews. Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 31.38). 02/2005; 6(1):57-69. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1583
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Communication between cells reaches its highest degree of specialization at chemical synapses. Some synapses talk in a 'whisper'; others 'shout'. The 'louder' the synapse, the more synaptic vesicles are needed to maintain effective transmission, ranging from a few hundred (whisperers) to nearly a million (shouters). These vesicles reside in different 'pools', which have been given a bewildering array of names. In this review, we focus on five tissue preparations in which synaptic vesicle pools have been identified and thoroughly characterized. We argue that, in each preparation, each vesicle can be assigned to one of three distinct pools.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neuronal communication relies on chemical synaptic transmission for information transfer and processing. Chemical neurotransmission is initiated by synaptic vesicle fusion with the presynaptic active zone resulting in release of neurotransmitters. Classical models have assumed that all synaptic vesicles within a synapse have the same potential to fuse under different functional contexts. In this model, functional differences among synaptic vesicle populations are ascribed to their spatial distribution in the synapse with respect to the active zone. Emerging evidence suggests, however, that synaptic vesicles are not a homogenous population of organelles, and they possess intrinsic molecular differences and differential interaction partners. Recent studies have reported a diverse array of synaptic molecules that selectively regulate synaptic vesicles’ ability to fuse synchronously and asynchronously in response to action potentials or spontaneously irrespective of action potentials. Here we discuss these molecular mediators of vesicle pool heterogeneity that are found on the synaptic vesicle membrane, on the presynaptic plasma membrane, or within the cytosol and consider some of the functional consequences of this diversity. This emerging molecular framework presents novel avenues to probe synaptic function and uncover how synaptic vesicle pools impact neuronal signaling.
    Traffic 01/2015; DOI:10.1111/tra.12262 · 4.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A case-control study to investigate the effect of the menstrual cycle on trigeminal nerve-induced vasodilation in healthy women and patients with menstrually related migraine (MRM). Using a laser-Doppler imager, we compared the vasodilator effects of capsaicin application and electrical stimulation (ES) on the forehead skin, a trigeminal nerve-innervated dermatome, in premenopausal patients with MRM (n = 22), healthy controls (n = 20), and postmenopausal women without migraine (n = 22). Blood samples were collected for female sex hormone measurements. Dermal blood flow (DBF) responses to capsaicin were higher in controls during days 1-2 than during days 19-21 of their menstruation cycle (mean Emax ± SEM: 203 ± 28 AU vs 156 ± 27 AU [p = 0.031] for 0.06 mg/mL capsaicin and 497 ± 25 AU vs 456 ± 24 AU [p = 0.009] for 6.0 mg/mL capsaicin). In contrast, patients with MRM demonstrated DBF responses without significant cycle-dependent variability (days 1-2 vs days 19-21: Emax 148 ± 20 AU vs 154 ± 20 AU [p = 0.788] for 0.06 mg/mL capsaicin and 470 ± 17 AU vs 465 ± 20 AU [p = 0.679] for 6.0 mg/mL capsaicin). DBF responses to ES were not different between either patients with MRM or controls, at either occasion. Estradiol levels on days 19-21 of the menstrual cycle were higher in healthy controls (mean ± SEM: 75 ± 8 pg/mL) than in patients with MRM (52 ± 4 pg/mL, p = 0.014). In postmenopausal women, DBF responses to capsaicin and ES, as well as estradiol levels at both visits, were all significantly reduced compared to patients with MRM and controls (in all cases, p < 0.05). Our study provides evidence for a reduced menstrual cyclicity of both estradiol levels and the trigeminovascular vasodilator system in patients with MRM. © 2014 American Academy of Neurology.
    Neurology 12/2014; 84(2). DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001142 · 8.30 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper the results of numerical simulation of neuro-transmitter fast transport in a presynaptic bouton of a biological neuron are presented. A mathematical model governing the transport that is fully described in [2] is recalled. A numerical simulation scheme, used parameters and their origins are described. Finally, the results of the simulation are presented.
    12/2010; 19(-1):9-22. DOI:10.2478/v10149-011-0001-1


Available from