Article

Strategies for minimizing immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

Transplantation Branch, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Transplant International (Impact Factor: 3.16). 02/2005; 18(1):2-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2004.00019.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Immunosuppression remains the cause of most morbidity following organ transplantation. However, its use is also responsible for the outstanding graft and patient survival rates commonplace in modern transplantation. Thus, the predominant challenge for transplant clinicians is to provide a level of immunosuppression that prevents graft rejection while preserving immunocompetence against environmental pathogens. This review will outline several strategies for minimizing or tailoring the use of immunosuppressive drugs. The arguments for various strategies will be based on clinical trial data rather than animal studies. A distinction will be made between conventional immunosuppressive drug reduction based on over-immunosuppression, and newer induction methods specifically designed to lessen the need for chronic immunosuppression. Based on the available data we suggest that most patients can be transplanted with less immunosuppression than is currently standard.

0 Followers
 · 
78 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cell mediated immunity (CMI) was assessed by the ImmuKnow assay in 12 patients after kidney transplantation, who presented with viral infection. Treatment included lowering of immunosuppression in all cases and antiviral treatment if indicated. The assay was repeated during the follow up. The ImmuKnow assay at time of presentation of viral infections was 56.8+/-58.2 (range 3-178; median 22) ATP ng/ml. With the clearance of viral infection and lowering of immunosuppression, the assay showed an increase in the level of CMI at 194.5+/-118.9 (range 53-409; median 150) ATP ng/ml. There was viral clearance or stabilization in all cases and there was no incidence of allograft rejection. The ImmuKnow assay of CMI can be used to titrate initial immunosuppression reduction and its subsequent increase, in patients with viral infection after transplantation.
    International Immunopharmacology 01/2007; 6(13-14):2023-6. DOI:10.1016/j.intimp.2006.09.023
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reduction of immunosuppression is considered a reasonable adjuvant therapeutic strategy in solid-organ transplant recipients experiencing multiple or high-risk skin cancers. However, the literature provides no guidance about what threshold of cancer development would warrant initiation of reduction of immunosuppression. To develop expert consensus guidelines for initiation of reduction of transplant-associated immunosuppression for solid-organ transplant recipients with severe skin cancer. An expert consensus panel was convened by the International Transplant Skin Cancer Collaborative and Skin Care for Organ Transplant Patients Europe Reduction of Immunosuppression Task Force. Thirteen hypothetical patient scenarios with graduated morbidity and mortality risks were presented and mean and mode expert opinions about appropriate level of reduction of systemic immunosuppression (mild, moderate, severe) were generated. Mild reduction of transplant-associated immunosuppression was considered warranted once multiple skin cancers per year developed or with individual high-risk skin cancers. Moderate reduction was considered appropriate when patients experienced > 25 skin cancers per year or for skin cancers with a 10% 3-year risk of mortality. Severe reduction was considered warranted only for life-threatening skin cancers. Reduction of immunosuppression is considered a reasonable adjuvant management strategy for transplant recipients with numerous or life-threatening skin cancers. Proposed guidelines are presented for the graduated reduction of immunosuppression coincident with the increasing skin cancer risks.
    British Journal of Dermatology 03/2006; 154(3):395-400. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.07087.x
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High throughput, high density platforms for transcriptional, proteomic, and metabonomic analyses are opening new doors for improving our understanding of the complexity and redundancy of the immune system in the interplay of the innate and allo-immune responses in organ transplantation. New insights are being obtained into the possible discrepancies between the gold standard of tissue pathological diagnosis and clinical graft outcomes, as new transcriptional categories of transplant rejection evolve. The bystander effects of chronic immunosuppression underlying the complexities of graft dysfunction are beginning to be understood. Non-invasive mechanisms to monitor transplants, by following 'footprints' of biomarker sets that reflect the disease phenotype, are being pursued for their clinical application for direct patient care. Utilization of these same biomarker sets may also offer a unique means to titrate immunosuppression and predict specific graft dysfunction events prior to clinical decline, thus bringing in the potential to reduce patient morbidity from infection and malignancy, preserve graft integrity, and limit the progression of chronic graft injury. Bioinformatics support is integral to the unraveling of the mysteries of the human genome, proteome, and metabolome in disease and in health.
    Immunological Reviews 05/2006; 210:138-55. DOI:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00359.x

Preview

Download
0 Downloads