Article
Sac enlargement without endoleak: when and how to convert and technical considerations.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Seminars in Vascular Surgery (impact factor:
1.71).
01/2005;
17(4):284-7.
pp.284-7
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (2)
-
Article: Clinical practice guidelines for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: written by the Standards of Practice Committee for the Society of Interventional Radiology and endorsed by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe and the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 09/2010; 21(11):1632-55. · 1.81 Impact Factor -
Article: Five-year report of a multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Compare long-term results of endovascular treatment and standard open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in a multicenter, concurrent-controlled trial. 334 subjects were treated with standard open repair (control, n = 99) or the original EXCLUDER Bifurcated Endoprosthesis (test, n = 235). Five-year clinical evaluations and corelab radiographic results are analyzed. Overall and aneurysm-related survival are similar. There have been ten open conversions, most frequently for enlarging sacs without endoleak. Two patients died after conversion. Including reinterventions and complications of reinterventions as adverse events, there is significant, persistent long-term reduction in major adverse events. At 5 years, corelab reported 0% limb narrowing, 0% trunk migration, 0% component (contralateral leg, aortic extender, and iliac extender) migration, 0% fracture, endoleak in 3% (2 type II/68), and aneurysm growth (>5 mm compared to baseline) in 38% (30/78) of the test group. There are no aneurysm ruptures in either test or control group. After 5 years follow-up, endovascular repair is a safer and effective treatment compared with open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Major adverse events are less frequent with the endograft despite the need for late reinterventions. Aneurysm expansion is observed in nearly two-fifths of patients but is not associated with endoleak or aneurysm rupture. Multicenter clinical trials are evaluating a newer version of this device designed to avoid this high rate of sac expansion.Journal of Vascular Surgery 05/2007; 45(5):885-90. · 3.21 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
AAA sac
abdominal aortic aneurysms
aneurysm sac enlargement
aneurysm size
aneurysm volume
benign condition
Direct puncture
endovascular AAA treatment
endovascular aneurysm
endovascular treatment
imperfect long-term treatment
infrarenal neck
open fenestration
open surgery
permanent solutions
persistent pressurization
pharmacological intervention
regular vascular graft
sac enlargement
third option