Article

The dromotropic pacemaker: system analysis and design considerations.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical Faculty, University Center of Medical Engineering (UZMT), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.
Biomedizinische Technik (Impact Factor: 1.16). 12/2004; 49(11):300-5. DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2004.056
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Patients suffering from chronotropic incompetence are generally treated with a rate-responsive pacemaker that stimulates the heart at a rate derived from a strain related sensor signal. The pacemaker concept described here uses a well-defined time interval in the electrogram as sensor parameter (AVCT: atrio-ventricular conduction time). AVCT is directly controlled by the autonomic nervous system. The design of the new algorithm was based on a thorough experimental analysis of AVCT subject to variations of the exercise rate and the pacing frequency. There it was demonstrated that AVCT is disturbed by the respiratory activity. The new rate-responsive algorithm which uses the internal model control principle explicitly takes into account the closed-loop nature of the underlying system. The major design objectives were: a) extended range of the individual heart rate, b) effective attenuation of the respiratory related disturbance and c) dynamic stability. Seven patients undergoing an incremental exercise test were paced with the new AVCT-based algorithm. When paced with this algorithm the paced heart rate was 126 +/- 12 min(-1) whereas the peak intrinsic heart rate was only 100 +/- 20 min(-1). The increase which was significant (26 +/- 13 min(-1); 15.53 min(-1)) clearly demonstrated the potential of this concept to restore chronotropic competence. A reanalysis of the experiments was undertaken in order to facilitate the individual parameterization in clinical practice. It could be demonstrated that a rather simple screening test is sufficient to gain the knowledge necessary for the individual parameterisation.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
79 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mental stress has been associated with serious cardiac arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. The purpose of this study was to assess cardiac electrophysiologic effects of mental stress and compare them with those of epinephrine infusion. Ten healthy male volunteers participated. Electrophysiologic and hemodynamic variables were measured at baseline, during mental stress produced by Stroop's color word conflict test and during epinephrine infusion at 2 rates (0.025 micromol/kg/min and 0.3 micromol/kg/min). Mental stress produced significant effects on the electrophysiologic properties of the heart with shortening of all measured electrophysiologic variables except atrial, most markedly those of the sinus and the atrioventricular nodes. The effects on the right ventricular myocardium and the His-Purkinje conduction system were less pronounced. During infusion of epinephrine, corresponding effects could only be reproduced at a much higher plasma level. Circulating epinephrine apparently plays a minor role as a mediator of mental stress effects on the heart.
    Journal of Electrocardiology 11/2003; 36(4):301-9. · 1.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronotropic incompetent patients are unable to adapt their heart rate adequately to the level of exertion. One treatment for this disease is a rate-responsive pacemaker that stimulates the heart at a rate proportional to an exertion-related variable derived from an implemented sensor (e.g., ventilation). The atrio-ventricular conduction time (AVCT), which can act as such a sensor, corresponds to a well-defined interval in the intracardial electrogram. The AVCT is coupled to the sympathetic/parasympathetic activity of the autonomous nervous system (dromotropic effect), leading to a shortening of AVCT during exercise. We found that AVCT is also sensitive to the pacing frequency (pf). Hence, an AVCT-based pacemaker always constitutes a closed-loop system. General design rules for an AVCT pacemaker have been developed from our experimental results and a system-theoretical treatment with reasonable assumptions. Problems addressed were uncertainties concerning the AVCT dynamics and disturbances in the signal. The following rules for the controller design have been derived: 1) The controller gain strongly depends on the therapeutic range of the pf, which is set by the medical doctor; 2) the closed-loop bandwidth of the system should be smaller than the respiratory frequency; and 3) a robust control strategy, capable of guaranteeing stability for a certain set of plant models, should be applied.
    IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 04/2002; 49(3):185-95. · 2.35 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the past, the development of rate-adaptive (sensor-controlled) pacemaker systems seems to have been determined primarily by the availability, compatibility and other properties of the technical sensor. This paper, however, focuses on the system-physiological aspect in an attempt to answer the question to what extent physiological cardiovascular control is restored by the pacemaker system. This is a question which should be asked before attempting to design a sensor-controlled system and especially before designing multisensor systems with infinite combinations. Four categories are defined: direct bridging ("shunting"), open loop systems, closed systems using cardiorespiratory or metabolic coupling and those using cardiac signals. Further subdivisions are shown. From the bioengineering as well as from the physiological viewpoint a system should preferably not combine sensors from one and the same of these categories. At present direct bridging is available only for the atrioventricular (AV)-block, so that for sick-sinus-syndrome (SSS) patients feedback control via cardiac signals ("inotropic" pacemaker) comes nearest the goal without, however, ideally bridging the gap. Open-loop systems should no longer be developed as single-sensor systems. A well developed activity sensor, however, which quickly pinpoints the most prominent stressor of cardiovascular control is best suited to complement another sensory system achieving closed-loop control. New and promising concepts orientated toward direct bridging are the analysis of monophasic action potentials and the "dromotropic" concept, both of which seek direct correlation with the "chronotropic" information not available in SSS patients.
    IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 10/1999; 46(9):1057-64. · 2.35 Impact Factor