The deep south network for cancer control: Eliminating cancer disparities through community - Academic collaboration
ABSTRACT African Americans have a substantially increased mortality rate compared to Whites in many cancers, including breast and cervix. The Deep South Network for Cancer Control (the Network) was established to develop sustainable community infrastructure to promote cancer awareness, enhance participation of African Americans and other special populations in clinical trials, recruit and train minority investigators, and develop and test innovative community-based cancer control measures to eliminate cancer mortality disparities in special populations. This article describes the steps necessary to form the network and the process and activities required to establish it as an effective infrastructure for eliminating disparities between Whites and African Americans in the United States.
- SourceAvailable from: Michelle R Lacey
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "Over the past four years, the nine institutions that comprise Region 3 have worked toward that goal. While previous inter-institutional partnerships focused on reducing cancer disparities, (Partridge et al., 2005; Gwede et al., 2011; Flores et al., 2011; Carey et al., 2005; Goldmon et al., 2008; Wynn et al., 2011) to date there have not been any published articles describing the development of a partnership as large as the Region 3 GMaP/BMaP network that specifically centered on health disparities and biobanking/biospecimen collection. "
ABSTRACT: Significant cancer health disparities exist in the United States and Puerto Rico. While numerous initiatives have been implemented to reduce cancer disparities, regional coordination of these efforts between institutions is often limited. To address cancer health disparities nation-wide, a series of regional transdisciplinary networks through the Geographic Management Program (GMaP) and the Minority Biospecimen/Biobanking Geographic Management Program (BMaP) were established in six regions across the country. This paper describes the development of the Region 3 GMaP/BMaP network composed of over 100 investigators from nine institutions in five Southeastern states and Puerto Rico to develop a state-of-the-art network for cancer health disparities research and training. We describe a series of partnership activities that led to the formation of the infrastructure for this network, recount the participatory processes utilized to develop and implement a needs and assets assessment and implementation plan, and describe our approach to data collection. Completion, by all nine institutions, of the needs and assets assessment resulted in several beneficial outcomes for Region 3 GMaP/BMaP. This network entails ongoing commitment from the institutions and institutional leaders, continuous participatory and engagement activities, and effective coordination and communication centered on team science goals.Evaluation and program planning 01/2013; 44. DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.12.003 · 0.89 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Given the recent advances in cancer treatment, cancer disparity between whites and African-Americans continues as an unacceptable health problem. African-Americans face a considerable disparity with regard to cancer incidence, survival, and mortality when compared with the majority white population. On the basis of prior research findings, the Deep South Network (DSN) chose to address cancer disparities by using the Community Health Advisor (CHA) model, the Empowerment Theory developed by Paulo Freire, and the Community Development Theory to build a community and coalition infrastructure. The CHA model and empowerment theory were used to develop a motivated volunteer, grassroots community infrastructure of Community Health Advisors as Research Partners (CHARPs), while the coalition-building model was used to build partnerships within communities and at a statewide level. With 883 volunteers trained as CHARPs spreading cancer awareness messages, both African-Americans and whites showed an increase in breast and cervical cancer screening utilization in Mississippi and Alabama. In Mississippi, taking into account the increase for the state as a whole, the proportion that might be attributable to the CHARP intervention was 23% of the increase in pap smears and 117% of the increase in mammograms. The DSN has been effective in raising cancer awareness, improving both education and outreach to its target populations, and increasing the use of cancer screening services. The National Cancer Institute has funded the Network for an additional 5 years. The goal of eliminating cancer health disparities will be pursued in the targeted rural and urban counties in Mississippi and Alabama using Community-Based Participatory Research. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.Cancer 01/2005; 107(S8):1971 - 1979. DOI:10.1002/cncr.22151 · 4.89 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To determine the impact of race and other factors on the management and outcomes of women treated for cervical cancer in a rural state. Following IRB approval, a retrospective review identified 434 eligible women treated for cervical cancer from 1994 to 2000. Collected data included: demographics, clinicopathologic data, primary and adjuvant therapy, recurrence, and survival. Statistical analyses were performed with the Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression. 304 (70%) of the women were white and 130 (30%) were non-white. Non-whites were more likely to present with advanced stage disease [Stage IIB-IVB] (25% vs. 13%; P < 0.01). Whites were more likely to smoke, be married, be employed, and have private insurance. Non-whites were more likely to have medical co-morbidities such as diabetes and hypertension. Although whites with early stage disease were more likely to undergo surgery as their primary therapy than non-whites (93% vs. 84%; P < 0.01), survival was similar. Survival outcomes for advanced stage disease were similar between groups. Non-whites diagnosed with cervical cancer are more likely to present with advanced stage disease than whites; however, overall survival was similar between groups. Non-whites with early stage disease were more likely to receive primary radiation therapy than whites. The decision to use radiation therapy vs. surgery does not appear to have a detrimental effect on overall survival, but may impact quality of life.Gynecologic Oncology 12/2005; 99(2):432-6. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.047 · 3.77 Impact Factor