CPREzy TM : an evaluation during simulated cardiac arrest on a hospital bed ଝ

Division of Medical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B152TT, UK.
Resuscitation (Impact Factor: 4.17). 01/2005; 64(1):103-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.08.011
Source: PubMed


CPREzy is a new adjunct designed to improve the application of manual external chest compressions (ECC) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The aim of this study was to determine the effect of using the CPREzy device compared to standard CPR during the simulated resuscitation of a patient on a hospital bed. Twenty medical student volunteers were randomised using a cross over trial design to perform 3 min of continuous ECC using CPREzy and standard CPR. There was a significant improvement in ECC depth with CPREzy compared to standard CPR 42.9 (4.4) mm versus 34.2 (7.6): mm, P = 0.001; 95% CI d.f. 4.4-12.9 mm. This translated to a reduction in the percentage of shallow compressions (<38 mm) with CPREzy 16 (23)% compared to standard CPR 59 (44)%, P = 0.003. There was a small increase in the percentage of compression regarded excessive (>51 mm): CPREzy 6.5 (19)% versus standard CPR 0 (0.1)%. P = 0.012). There was no difference in compression rate or duty cycle between techniques. Equal numbers of participants (40% in each group) performed one of more incorrectly placed chest compression. However the total number of incorrect compressions was higher for the CPREzy group (26% versus 3.9% standard CPR, P < 0.001). This was due to a higher number of low compressions (26% of total compressions for CPREzy versus 1% for standard CPR, P < 0.001). In conclusion, CPREzy was associated with significant improvements in ECC performance. Further animal and clinical studies are required to validate this finding in vivo and to see if it translates to an improvement in outcome in human victims of cardiac arrest.

Download full-text


Available from: David R Thickett, Sep 30, 2015
64 Reads
  • Source
    • "Chest compression rate and depth are usually estimated by double integration of the acceleration or by mapping the pressure according to a built-in sensor in the feedback device during CCs [6] [7] [8]. By using both a feedback device and the guidance of a metronome, providers can perform CC at a correct and consistent rate following CPR guidelines [6] [7]. However, they might not compress the chest to the correct depth according to the guidelines because some devices overestimate or underestimate the depth, depending on the stiffness and the angle of incline of the surface on which the patient is placed [9]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Feedback devices are used to improve chest compression (CC) quality related to survival rates in cardiac arrest. However, several studies have shown that feedback devices are not sufficiently reliable to ensure adequate CC depth on soft surfaces. Here, we determined the proper target depth of feedback (TDF) using an accelerometer during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in hospital beds. In prospective randomized crossover study, 19 emergency physicians performed CCs for 2 minutes continuously on a manikin in 2 different beds with 3 TDFs (5, 6, and 7 cm). We measured CC depth, the proportion of accurate compression depths, CC rate, the proportion of incomplete chest decompressions, the velocity of CC (CC velocity), the proportion of time spent in CC relative to compression plus decompression (duty cycle), and the time spent in CC (CC time). Mean (SD) CC depths at TDF 5, 6, and 7 were 45.42 (5.79), 52.68 (4.18), and 58.47 (2.48) on one bed and 46.26 (4.49), 53.58 (3.15), and 58.74 (2.10) mm on the other bed (all P < .001), respectively. The proportions of accurate compression depths and CC velocity at TDF 5, 6, and 7 differed significantly according to TDF on both beds (all P < .001).The CC rate, CC time, and proportion of incomplete chest decompression did not differ on both beds (all P > .05). The duty cycle differed significantly on only B2. The target depth of the real-time feedback device should be at least 6 cm but should not exceed 7 cm for optimal CC on patients on hospital beds. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    The American journal of emergency medicine 07/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2015.07.010 · 1.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "According to the 2010 American Heart Association (AHA) Guideline, rescuers should compress the sternum deeper (i.e. to at least 5cm) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) than required by past guidelines [1]. In order to ensure that high-quality CPR is performed, many kinds of feedback devices have been developed which allow for improved chest compression depth (CCD) in manikin studies [2], [3]. However, Perkins et al. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In order to ensure that high-quality cardio-pulmonary-resuscitation (CPR) is performed, many kinds of feedback devices have been developed that are helpful for achieving correct chest compression (CC) in manikin studies. However, the mattress compression depth (MCD) can cause overestimation of chest compression depth (CCD) during CPR using a feedback device. Herein, we propose a new method using a vinyl cover that encloses the foam mattress and is compressed by vacuum pump just before performing CPR, which could increase the performance of CCs during CPR.
    Conference proceedings: ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference 07/2013; 2013:469-472. DOI:10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609538
  • Source
    • "Reanimation products for supporting CPR procedure and training have been developed, e.g., automatic external defibrillator (AED) [5], and CPREzy [6]. The available products aid effective CPR chest compressions through a combination of the correct rate, rhythm, and depth compression with audio and visual feedback [7], [8]. However, most of the available products cannot be applied for newborn infants, for example, CPREzy is designed for patients of 8 years or above and weighing more than 40 kg. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During the stress of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), it is difficult to maintain the right rhythm and correct ratio of insufflations to chest compressions and to exert the compressions at a constant pressure. In this paper, we propose and demonstrate an integrated sensor system-the "Rhythm of Life Aid" (ROLA) to support medical staff during CPR of newborn infants. The design concept is based on interactive audio and visual feedback with consideration of functionalities and user friendliness. A prototype ROLA device is built, consisting of a transparent foil integrated with pressure sensor and electroluminescent foil actuators for indication of the exerted chest compression pressure, as well as an audio box to generate distinctive sounds as audio guidance for insufflations and compressions. To evaluate the performance of the ROLA device, a sensory mannequin and a dedicated software interface are implemented to give immediate feedback and record data for further processing. Tests of the ROLA prototype on the sensory mannequin by ten pairs of a doctor and a nurse at Máxima Medical Centre in Veldhoven, The Netherlands show that the use of ROLA device achieves a more constant rhythm and pressure of chest compressions during CPR of newborn infants.
    IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine: a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 11/2010; 14(6):1468-1474. DOI:10.1109/TITB.2010.2050592 · 2.49 Impact Factor
Show more