Delineating the Structure of Normal and Abnormal Personality: An Integrative Hierarchical Approach.

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Impact Factor: 5.08). 02/2005; 88(1):139-57. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139
Source: PubMed


Increasing evidence indicates that normal and abnormal personality can be treated within a single structural framework. However, identification of a single integrated structure of normal and abnormal personality has remained elusive. Here, a constructive replication approach was used to delineate an integrative hierarchical account of the structure of normal and abnormal personality. This hierarchical structure, which integrates many Big Trait models proposed in the literature, replicated across a meta-analysis as well as an empirical study, and across samples of participants as well as measures. The proposed structure resembles previously suggested accounts of personality hierarchy and provides insight into the nature of personality hierarchy more generally. Potential directions for future research on personality and psychopathology are discussed.

Download full-text


Available from: David Watson, Dec 18, 2013
  • Source
    • "DeYoung (2011) stresses the fact, that conscientiousness is closely and negatively linked to impulsivity. Indeed, some researchers view impulsivity as a negative pole of conscientiousness (Markon et al., 2005). The former has been found to correlate positively with delay discounting (e.g. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although conceptually conscientiousness should be positively associated with intelligence, existing empirical data do not support this hypothesis. Several recent investigations reported a negative association of the two variables. In the present paperwe examine the national data on personality and intelligence.We used the NEO-PI-R data on national personality. We were interested how the analysis conducted at national level may shed new light on the relationship between conscientiousness and cognitive ability. Themost important finding concerned the differences in correlations between self-report and observer-rating conscientiousness scores with IQ. The former was negatively associated with cognitive ability, while the latter positively. The analyses of the conscientiousness facets revealed, that in regression models three components of conscientiousness predicted national intelligence. Specifically, achievement striving and deliberationwere negatively associated with IQ,while dutifulness was in a positive relationship with cognitive ability. Interestingly, this pattern was the same in self and observer rating scores.
    Learning and Individual Differences 08/2015; 43. DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.009 · 1.62 Impact Factor
    • "at characterize patient presentations is a pathway FIGURE 1 . Pathological Personality Trait Hierarchy . This figure is based loosely on Wright and colleagues ' ( 2012 ) examination of the Personality Inventory for DSM - 5 ; certain aspects of the hierarchy may differ depending on the specific instruments being analyzed ( e . g . , Digman , 1996 ; Markon et al . , 2005 ) . It is understood that the hierarchy depicted here extends downward from the level of five domains to depict narrower trait facets , which may vary depending on the specific instrument being used ."
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this special issue of the Journal of Personality Disorders is to promote the integration of personality structure and dynamics towards more evidence-based and clinically useful conceptualizations of personality pathology. In this article, we describe a contemporary model of personality structure that is useful for distinguishing patients from one another and the connections between this structure and within-person dynamics that occur across different levels of an individual personality, across situations, and within situations. In so doing, we connect the personality trait tradition that has tended to emphasize stable individual differences with traditions that have tended to focus on the more dynamic aspects of interpersonal behavior and emotional experience. We then introduce the empirical articles in this special issue within this integrative context, in order to demonstrate the value in connecting personality structure to dynamics for research and practice.
    Journal of Personality Disorders 07/2015; 29(4):431-448. DOI:10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.431 · 2.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • " to the English original in non - clinical Spanish samples but it is not yet known how well they function , at psychometric level , with Spanish psychiatric samples . Some research suggests that instruments assessing FFM traits in non - clinical samples are valuable for assessing person - ality in psychiatric samples but results are inconclusive ( Markon et al . , 2005 ; Samuel et al . , 2010 ) ."
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Spanish NEO-FFI-R using Rasch analyses, in order to test its rating scale functioning, the reliability of scores, internal structure, and differential item functioning (DIF) by gender in a psychiatric sample. The NEO-FFI-R responses of 433 Spanish adults (154 males) with an anxiety disorder as primary diagnosis were analyzed using the Rasch model for rating scales. Two intermediate categories of response (‘neutral’ and ‘agree’) malfunctioned in the Neuroticism and Conscientiousness scales. In addition, model reliabilities were lower than expected in Agreeableness and Neuroticism, and the item fit values indicated each scale had items that did not achieve moderate to high discrimination on its dimension, particularly in the Agreeableness scale. Concerning unidimensionality, the five NEO-FFI-R scales showed large first components of unexplained variance. Finally, DIF by gender was detected in seventeen items. The results suggest that the scores of the Spanish NEO-FFI-R are unreliable in psychiatric samples and cannot be generalized between males and females, especially in the Openness, Conscientiousness, and Agreeableness scales. Future directions for testing and refinement should be developed before the NEO-FFI-R can be used reliably in clinical samples.
    Frontiers in Psychology 03/2015; 6:465. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00465 · 2.80 Impact Factor
Show more