Hand washing compliance among retail food establishment workers in Minnesota.

Division of Environmental Health, Minnesota Department of Health, St Paul, Minnesota 55121, USA.
Journal of food protection (Impact Factor: 1.8). 01/2005; 67(12):2825-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Inadequate hand washing by food workers is an important contributing factor to foodborne disease outbreaks in retail food establishments (RFEs). We conducted a survey of RFEs to investigate the effect of hand washing training, availability of hand washing facilities, and the ability of the person in charge (PIC) to describe hand washing according to the Minnesota Food Code (food code) on workers' ability to demonstrate food code-compliant hand washing. Only 52% of the PICs could describe the hand washing procedure outlined in the food code, and only 48% of workers could demonstrate code-compliant hand washing. The most common problems observed were failure to wash for 20 s and failure to use a fingernail brush. There was a strong positive association between the PIC being a certified food manager and being able to describe the food code hand washing procedure (odds ratio [OR], 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2 to 13.7), and there was an even stronger association between the PIC being able to describe hand washing and workers being able to demonstrate code-compliant hand washing (OR, 15; 95% CI, 6 to 37). Significant associations were detected among correct hand washing demonstration, physical infrastructure for hand washing, and the hand washing training methods used by the establishment. However, the principal determinant of successful hand washing demonstration was the PIC's ability to describe proper hand washing procedure. These results suggest that improving hand washing practices among food workers will require interventions that address PIC knowledge of hand washing requirement and procedure and the development and implementation of effective hand washing training methods.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of food handler retraining. The food safety knowledge of handlers who had been previously certified by the FOODSAFE training programme in British Columbia, Canada was compared prior to and nine months following FOODSAFE retraining. The previously FOODSAFE trained food handlers were selected from participants of a 2009 survey. Food safety knowledge scores were compared between (1) previously FOODSAFE trained food handlers who received retraining (the intervention group), (2) previously FOODSAFE trained food handlers who did not receive retraining (the control group), and (3) untrained food handlers (the untrained group). Data gathered in a telephone survey demonstrated knowledge scores were significantly higher in the inter-vention group when compared with the control group, and when compared with the untrained group. No differences in food safety knowledge scores were found based on English as a first language or receiving food safety training other than FOODSAFE. These results support a requirement for periodic recertification of trained food handlers and demonstrate a need for education of untrained food handlers with a food safety training programme.
    Food Control 01/2014; 35(1):137-141. DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.06.028 · 2.82 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Infection with human norovirus (HuNoV) is considered a common cause of foodborne illness worldwide. Foodborne HuNoV outbreaks may result from consumption of food contaminated by an infected food handler in the foodservice environment, in which bare-hand contact, lack of hand washing, and inadequate cleaning and disinfection are common contributing factors. The goal of this study was to examine cross-contamination of a HuNoV surrogate, murine norovirus (MNV-1), during common procedures used in preparing fresh produce in a food service setting, including turning water spigots, handling and chopping Romaine lettuce, and washing hands. MNV-1 transfer % was log-transformed to achieve a normal distribution of the data and enable appropriate statistical analyses to be performed. MNV-1 transfer coefficients varied by surface type, and a greater affinity for human hands and chopped lettuce was observed. For example, greater transfer was observed from a contaminated stainless steel spigot to a clean hand (24% or 1.4-log transfer %) compared to transfer from hand to spigot (0.6% or -0.2-log transfer %). During the chopping of Romaine lettuce, MNV-1 was transferred from either a contaminated cutting board (25% or 1.4-log transfer %) or knife (~100% or 2.0-log transfer %) to lettuce at a significantly greater rate (p>0.05) than from contaminated lettuce to the board (2.1% or 0.3-log transfer %) and knife (1.2% or 0.06-log transfer %). No significant difference (p>0.05) in MNV-1 transfer coefficients was observed between bare hands and Romaine lettuce during handling. For handwashing trials, only one hand was inoculated with MNV-1 prior to washing. The handwashing methods included rubbing hands under tap water for at least 5s (average 2.8-log reduction) or washing hands for at least 20s with liquid soap (average 2.9-log reduction) or foaming soap (average 3.0-log reduction), but no statistical difference between these reductions was achieved (p>0.05). Despite the reductions of MNV-1 observed, residual virions were detected on both hands after washing in every replicate trial. This observation reveals that virions are transferred from one hand to the other during washing with and without soap. Each transfer scenario was repeated at least 9 times, and the data gathered indicate that MNV-1 transfers readily between common surfaces during food preparation. These data are important for the development of quantitative risk analyses, and will assist in the development of appropriate intervention strategies for enteric viruses in food preparation. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Sep 17, 2014