Structural basis of actin filament nucleation and processive capping by a formin homology 2 domain.

Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA.
Nature (Impact Factor: 42.35). 03/2005; 433(7025):488-94.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The conserved formin homology 2 (FH2) domain nucleates actin filaments and remains bound to the barbed end of the growing filament. Here we report the crystal structure of the yeast Bni1p FH2 domain in complex with tetramethylrhodamine-actin. Each of the two structural units in the FH2 dimer binds two actins in an orientation similar to that in an actin filament, suggesting that this structure could function as a filament nucleus. Biochemical properties of heterodimeric FH2 mutants suggest that the wild-type protein equilibrates between two bound states at the barbed end: one permitting monomer binding and the other permitting monomer dissociation. Interconversion between these states allows processive barbed-end polymerization and depolymerization in the presence of bound FH2 domain. Kinetic and/or thermodynamic differences in the conformational and binding equilibria can explain the variable activity of different FH2 domains as well as the effects of the actin-binding protein profilin on FH2 function.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Self-organization of cytoskeletal proteins such as actin and tubulin into filaments and microtubules is frequently assisted by the proteins binding to them. Formins are actin regulatory proteins, which nucleate the formation of new filaments and are essential for a wide range of cellular functions. The vertebrate Inverted Formin 2 (INF2) has both actin filament nucleating and severing/depolymerizing activities connected to its ability to encircle actin filaments. Using atomic force microscopy (AFM), we report that an FH2 domain-containing construct of INF2 (INF2-FH1-FH2-C or INF2-FFC) self assembles into nanoscale ring-like oligomeric structures in the absence of actin filaments, demonstrating an inherent ability to re-organize from a dimeric to an oligomeric state. A construct lacking the C-terminal region (INF2-FH1-FH2 or INF2-FF) also oligomerizes, confirming dominant role of FH2-mediated interactions. Moreover, INF2-FFC domains were observed to organize into ring like structures around single actin filaments. This is the first demonstration that formin FH2 domains can self-assemble into oligomers in the absence of filaments, and has important implications for observing un-averaged decoration and/or remodeling of filaments by actin binding proteins.
    Langmuir 06/2014; · 4.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We have previously shown that RhoA-mediated actin polymerization stimulates smooth muscle cell (SMC)-specific transcription by regulating the nuclear localization of the Myocardin-Related Transcription Factors (MRTFs). Based upon the recent demonstration that nuclear G-actin regulates MRTF nuclear export and observations from our lab and others that the RhoA effector, mDia2, shuttles between the nucleus and cytoplasm, we investigated whether nuclear RhoA signaling plays a role in regulating MRTF activity. We identified sequences that control mDia2 nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling and used mDia2 variants to demonstrate that mDia2's ability to fully stimulate MRTF nuclear accumulation and SMC-specific gene transcription was dependent upon its localization to the nucleus. To test whether RhoA signaling promotes nuclear actin polymerization, we established a Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP)-based assay to measure GFP-actin diffusion in the nuclear compartment. Nuclear actin FRAP was delayed in cells expressing nuclear targeted constitutively active mDia1 and mDia2 variants and in cells treated with the polymerization inducer, jasplakinolide. In contrast, FRAP was enhanced in cells expressing a nuclear-targeted variant of mDia that inhibits both mDia1 and mDia2. Treatment of 10T1/2 cells with sphingosine 1-phosphate induced RhoA activity in the nucleus and forced nuclear localization of RhoA or the Rho-specific GEF, LARG, enhanced the ability of these proteins to stimulate MRTF activity. Taken together, these data support the emerging idea that RhoA dependent nuclear actin polymerization has important effects on transcription and nuclear structure.
    AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology 06/2014; · 4.01 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Formins are multi-domain proteins that assemble actin in a wide variety of biological processes. They both nucleate and remain processively associated with growing filaments, in some cases accelerating filament growth. The well-conserved Formin Homology 1 and 2 domains were originally thought to be solely responsible for these activities. Recently a role in nucleation was identified for the Diaphanous Autoinhibitory Domain (DAD), which is C-terminal to the Formin Homology-2 domain. The C-terminal tail of the Drosophila formin Cappuccino (Capu) is conserved among FMN formins but distinct from other formins. It does not have a DAD domain. Nevertheless, we find that Capu-tail plays a role in filament nucleation similar to that described for mDia1 and other formins. Building on this story, replacement of Capu-tail with DADs from other formins tunes nucleation activity. Capu-tail has low affinity interactions with both actin monomers and filaments. Removal of the tail reduces actin filament binding and bundling. Further, when the tail is removed, we find that processivity is compromised. Despite decreased processivity, the elongation rate of filaments is unchanged. Again, replacement of Capu-tail with DADs from other formins tunes the processive association with the barbed end, indicating that this is a general role for formin tails. Our data show a role for the Capu-tail domain in assembling the actin cytoskeleton, largely mediated by electrostatic interactions. Due to its multifunctionality, the formin tail is a candidate for regulation by other proteins during cytoskeletal rearrangements.
    Journal of Biological Chemistry 09/2014; 289(44). · 4.60 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 27, 2014