Biological and biomechanical evaluation of bone remodelling and implant stability after using an osteotome technique.

André Büchter, Johannes Kleinheinz, Hans-Peter Wiesmann, Jan Kersken, Manuel Nienkemper, Hendrik von Weyhrother, Ulrich Joos, Ulrich Meyer

Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Münster, Waldeyerstrasse 30, D-48129 Münster, Germany.

Journal Article: Clinical Oral Implants Research (impact factor: 2.92). 02/2005; 16(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01081.x

Abstract

The influence of the osteotome technique on the osseointegration and biomechanical behaviour of cylinder implants (SLA, ITI was compared with conventional preparation of the implant site in an animal model. A total of 56 implants were placed in the cranial and caudal tibia condyle of six Gottinger minipigs. The implant site was prepared either by the conventional technique with drills (control group A) or by the osteotome technique (experimental group B). Resonance frequency measurements (RFMs) were made on each implant at the time of fixture placement and at the time of scarification. Half of the minipigs were sacrificed 7 days and 28 days after implant placement and the implants were removed with the surrounding bone. Bone tissue responses were evaluated by histological analysis and removal torque testing. For histological evaluation 30-50 microm-thick ground sections were examined. Biomechanical testing revealed a significantly higher stability of implants in the control group (A) than in the experimental group (B) (P = 0.004) at day 7. After 28 days implant stability in the control group remained significant higher (47%) than those of group B (P > 0.001). RFM demonstrated no significant difference between both groups and during the experimental course. Histological analysis demonstrated fractured trabeculae in peri-implant bone in the experimental group at day 7, while they were not posed at day 28. We conclude that the decreased implant stability by using the osteotome technique is based on microfractures in peri-implant bone.

Source: PubMed

Comments on this publication

ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!

Similar publications

Science & Research Jobs

Keywords

28 days implant stability
 
56 implants
 
7 days
 
biomechanical behaviour
 
Biomechanical testing
 
Bone tissue responses
 
caudal tibia condyle
 
conventional technique
 
cylinder implants
 
decreased implant stability
 
experimental course
 
experimental group B
 
fractured trabeculae
 
higher stability
 
implant site
 
implants
 
osteotome technique
 
peri-implant bone
 
removal torque testing
 
Resonance frequency measurements