Evidence against the hopping mechanism as an important electron transfer pathway for conformationally constrained oligopeptides

Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Università di Padova, via Marzolo 1, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Journal of the American Chemical Society (Impact Factor: 11.44). 02/2005; 127(2):492-3. DOI: 10.1021/ja043607e
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The rate constant of intramolecular electron transfer through oligopeptides based on the alpha-aminoisobutyric acid residue was determined as a function of the peptide length and found to depend weakly on the donor-acceptor separation. By measuring the electron-transfer activation energy and estimating the energy gap between donor and bridge, we were able to discard the electron hopping mechanism.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this review, we discuss the factors that influence electron transfer in peptides. We summarize experimental results from solution and surface studies and highlight the ongoing debate on the mechanistic aspects of this fundamental reaction. Here, we provide a balanced approach that remains unbiased and does not favor one mechanistic view over another. Support for a putative hopping mechanism in which an electron transfers in a stepwise manner is contrasted with experimental results that support electron tunneling or even some form of ballistic transfer or a pathway transfer for an electron between donor and acceptor sites. In some cases, experimental evidence suggests that a change in the electron transfer mechanism occurs as a result of donor-acceptor separation. However, this common understanding of the switch between tunneling and hopping as a function of chain length is not sufficient for explaining electron transfer in peptides. Apart from chain length, several other factors such as the extent of the secondary structure, backbone conformation, dipole orientation, the presence of special amino acids, hydrogen bonding, and the dynamic properties of a peptide also influence the rate and mode of electron transfer in peptides. Electron transfer plays a key role in physical, chemical and biological systems, so its control is a fundamental task in bioelectrochemical systems, the design of peptide based sensors and molecular junctions. Therefore, this topic is at the heart of a number of biological and technological processes and thus remains of vital interest.
    Chemical Society Reviews 01/2015; DOI:10.1039/c4cs00297k · 30.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The electron transfer mechanism for the prototypical system ferrocenoyl-glycylcystamine (Fc-Gly-CSA) on Au (111) is investigated within the framework of Density Functional Theory. Different Fc-Gly-CSA/Au systems, including the explicit methanol solvent and sodium perchlorate counterion, are studied. As seen from the partial density of states, electronic contributions close to the Fermi energy are found to derive only from the ferrocene units and gold atoms, while the contributions from electronic states located on the molecular spacers (Gly-CSA) are detected at lower energies, with or without the effects of the environment. These results strongly indicate a direct ferrocene-to-gold tunneling as the electron transfer mechanism across the interface. doi: 10.1021/jp506425c
    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 09/2014; 118(40). DOI:10.1021/jp506425c · 4.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A central vision in molecular electronics is the creation of devices with functional molecular components that may provide unique properties. Proteins are attractive candidates for this purpose, as they have specific physical (optical, electrical) and chemical (selective binding, self-assembly) functions and offer a myriad of possibilities for (bio-)chemical modification. This Progress Report focuses on proteins as potential building components for future bioelectronic devices as they are quite efficient electronic conductors, compared with saturated organic molecules. The report addresses several questions: how general is this behavior; how does protein conduction compare with that of saturated and conjugated molecules; and what mechanisms enable efficient conduction across these large molecules? To answer these questions results of nanometer-scale and macroscopic electronic transport measurements across a range of organic molecules and proteins are compiled and analyzed, from single/few molecules to large molecular ensembles, and the influence of measurement methods on the results is considered. Generalizing, it is found that proteins conduct better than saturated molecules, and somewhat poorer than conjugated molecules. Significantly, the presence of cofactors (redox-active or conjugated) in the protein enhances their conduction, but without an obvious advantage for natural electron transfer proteins. Most likely, the conduction mechanisms are hopping (at higher temperatures) and tunneling (below ca. 150–200 K).
    Advanced Materials 11/2014; 26(42). DOI:10.1002/adma.201402304 · 15.41 Impact Factor