Article

Volumetric and linear assessment of maxillary sinuses using computed tomography.

Department of Stomatology, College of Dentistry, The University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Bulletin du Groupement international pour la recherche scientifique en stomatologie & odontologie 46(1):8-14. pp.8-14
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this work was to compare linear and volumetric measurements of maxillary sinus (with and without lesion), using 3D (gold standard) and multiplanar reconstructions (MRP) by computed tomography in order to establish the precision and accuracy of these methods, determining which one would allow more effective assessments for this site. Linear measurements were performed in the maxillary sinus of 50 patients and compared with MPR and 3D images. We also analyzed the area and volume of this anatomic structure. Inter- and intra-observer average percentage errors for linear measurements were lower than 4%, the samples with lesion presenting higher values. The average error of accuracy was 4.94% for sinuses with lesion, and 7.41% for those without. We could verify that the antero-posterior and right-left measurements in axial view showed smaller figures of error when compared to sagittal and coronal reconstructions, respectively. The largest diameters observed for the sinuses had, in average, 39.6 mm in the antero-posterior direction, 28.35 mm in the right-left direction, and 36.3 mm in the supero-inferior. For the volume and area assessment, the values of error ranged lower than 9%, the highest values corresponding to the samples with lesion. The precision of measurements was inferior for maxillary sinus with lesion when compared with those without lesion. Measurements performed in the axial view were more precise than those performed in MPR images, and the coronal view measurements were considered to be more precise than the sagittal measurements.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
20 Views

Keywords

anatomic structure
 
antero-posterior direction
 
area assessment
 
average error
 
axial view
 
computed tomography
 
coronal view measurements
 
effective assessments
 
gold standard
 
higher values
 
highest values corresponding
 
intra-observer average percentage errors
 
largest diameters
 
Linear measurements
 
Measurements
 
multiplanar reconstructions
 
right-left direction
 
right-left measurements
 
sagittal measurements
 
volumetric measurements