Article

Pre-existent left atrial scarring in patients undergoing pulmonary vein antrum isolation - An independent predictor of procedural failure

Section of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Impact Factor: 15.34). 02/2005; 45(2):285-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.035
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The goal of this study was to assess the impact of left atrial scarring (LAS) on the outcome of patients undergoing pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) for atrial fibrillation (AF).
Left atrial scarring may be responsible for both the perpetuation and genesis of AF.
A total of 700 consecutive patients undergoing first-time PVAI were studied. Before ablation, extensive voltage mapping of the left atrium (LA) was performed using a multipolar Lasso catheter guided by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). Patients with LAS were defined by a complete absence of electrographic recording by a circular mapping catheter in multiple LA locations, and this was validated by electroanatomic mapping. All four pulmonary vein antra and the superior vena cava were isolated using an ICE-guided technique. Patients were followed at least nine months for late AF recurrence. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of LAS and other variables on outcome.
Of 700 patients, 42 had LAS, which represented 21 +/- 11% of the LA surface area by electroanatomic mapping. Patients with LAS had a significantly higher AF recurrence (57%) compared with non-LAS patients (19%, p = 0.003). Also, LAS was associated with a significantly larger LA size, lower ejection fraction, and higher C-reactive protein levels. Univariate analysis revealed age, nonparoxysmal AF, and LAS as predictors of recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed LAS as the only independent predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 9.4; p = 0.01).
Pre-existent LAS in patients undergoing PVAI for AF is a powerful, independent predictor of procedural failure. Left atrial scarring is associated with a lower EF, larger LA size, and increased inflammatory markers.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
112 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is limited knowledge on the extent and location of scarring that results from catheter ablation and its role in suppressing atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined the effect of atrial fibrosis and ablation induced scarring on catheter ablation outcomes in AF. We conducted a prospective multicenter study that enrolled 329 AF patients presenting for catheter ablation. Delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) of the left atrium was obtained pre-ablation. Scarring was evaluated in 177 patients with a DE-MRI scan obtained 90 days post-ablation. We evaluated residual fibrosis, defined as pre-ablation atrial fibrosis not covered by ablation scar. The primary outcome was freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia. In the analysis cohort of 177 patients, pre-ablation fibrosis was 18.7±8.7% of the atrial wall. Ablation aimed at pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was performed in 163 patients (92.1%). Ablation-induced scar averaged 10.6±4.4% of the atrial wall. Scarring completely encircled all 4 PVs only in 12 patients (7.3%). Residual fibrosis was calculated at 15.8 ± 8.0%. At 325 days follow-up 35% of patients experienced recurrent arrhythmia. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models demonstrated that baseline atrial fibrosis (HR and 95% CIs) (1.09 (1.06-1.12), p < 0.001) and residual fibrosis (1.09 (1.05-1.13), p < 0.001) were associated with atrial arrhythmia recurrence, while PV encirclement and overall scar were not. Catheter ablation of AF targeting pulmonary veins rarely achieves permanent encircling scar in the intended areas. Overall atrial fibrosis present at baseline and residual fibrosis uncovered by ablation scar are associated with recurrent arrhythmia. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 02/2015; DOI:10.1111/jce.12650 · 3.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ADVERTIMENT. La consulta d'aquesta tesi queda condicionada a l'acceptació de les següents condicions d'ús: La difusió d'aquesta tesi per mitjà del servei TDX (www.tesisenxarxa.net) ha estat autoritzada pels titulars dels drets de propietat intel·lectual únicament per a usos privats emmarcats en activitats d'investigació i docència. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva difusió i posada a disposició des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. No s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant al resum de presentació de la tesi com als seus continguts. En la utilització o cita de parts de la tesi és obligat indicar el nom de la persona autora. ADVERTENCIA. La consulta de esta tesis queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: La difusión de esta tesis por medio del servicio TDR (www.tesisenred.net) ha sido autorizada por los titulares de los derechos de propiedad intelectual únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con finalidades de lucro ni su difusión y puesta a disposición desde un sitio ajeno al servicio TDR. No se autoriza la presentación de su contenido en una ventana o marco ajeno a TDR (framing). Esta reserva de derechos afecta tanto al resumen de presentación de la tesis como a sus contenidos. En la utilización o cita de partes de la tesis es obligado indicar el nombre de la persona autora. WARNING. On having consulted this thesis you're accepting the following use conditions: Spreading this thesis by the TDX (www.tesisenxarxa.net) service has been authorized by the titular of the intellectual property rights only for private uses placed in investigation and teaching activities. Reproduction with lucrative aims is not authorized neither its spreading and availability from a site foreign to the TDX service. Introducing its content in a window or frame foreign to the TDX service is not authorized (framing). This rights affect to the presentation summary of the thesis as well as to its contents. In the using or citation of parts of the thesis it's obliged to indicate the name of the author.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pulmonary venous isolation has emerged as an effective therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF); however, AF recurrence is common. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on the recurrence rate of AF following ablation therapy. In total, 120 patients, who were scheduled for ablation, were randomly selected. The patients were randomly divided into three groups, which received treatment with a placebo (n=40), 80 mg valsartan daily (n=40) or with 160 mg valsartan daily (n=40). The demographic characteristics, comorbidities, AF type and information regarding treatment with ARBs were recorded and analyzed. Following a mean follow-up period of 13.8±8.6 months, 66.7% of patients were found to be free of AF. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the time until the first recurrence during the follow-up period revealed that patients treated with 160 mg/day valsartan presented a higher probability of remaining free of AF (88%, vs. 47% for the control and 65% for the 80 mg/day valsartan groups). In addition, multivariate analysis demonstrated that treatment with ARB was associated with lower AF recurrence rates (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.93] P=0.01). In conclusion, treatment with 160 mg/day valsartan markedly reduced the risk of recurrence of AF in a dose-dependent manner in AF patients following ablation.
    Experimental and therapeutic medicine 02/2015; 9(2):631-635. DOI:10.3892/etm.2014.2143 · 0.94 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
1 Download
Available from