Effect of the WHI study on the attitude of Israeli gynecologists to hormonal therapy during menopause.

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology (Impact Factor: 0.36). 02/2004; 31(4):267-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the attitude of Israeli gynecologists to the use of hormonal therapy (HT) during menopause consequent to the recent publication of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study.
Gynecologists present at the annual convention of the Israeli Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology in the community were asked to complete a 5-item questionnaire on their opinions regarding hormone therapy (HT) use in light of the WHI study.
Ninety-five percent of the physicians believed that HT is still a legitimate treatment modality during menopause, although almost 40% would now limit it to the management of climacteric symptoms. As a result of the WHI study, 65% of the physicians recommended cessation of HT use in up to 30% of their treated postmenopausal patients. The responders estimated that about 40% of their patients using HT ceased treatment on their own initiative following publication of the WHI study.
Both physicians and patients were clearly influenced by the WHI study. Today, HT is being reserved by most gynecologists in Israel for the treatment of menopausal symptoms and is not being used as a preventive measure against future complications of heart disease and osteoporosis.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The evidence concerning the effects of hormone therapy (HT) has been greatly expanded by the publication of very large randomized controlled trials. A consequence has been concern among women about the risks of HT such that the number of menopausal women using HT for relief of menopausal symptoms has declined. It is now appropriate to look at the best evidence available and to consider current policies. Women in the early postmenopausal phase, generally younger than 60 years of age, who are troubled by menopausal symptoms should be reassured that, for their circumstances, medical management of menopause in the form of HT is appropriate. If they go on to use HT for several years, it is possible that they will experience skeletal and coronary health benefits, but the evidence for such benefits is a matter of ongoing debate.
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 05/2008; 1127:134-9. DOI:10.1196/annals.1434.002 · 4.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine physicians' views and practices concerning estrogen+progestogen therapy (EPT). Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of physicians in the United States (US) in 2003. A total of 1614 (53.8%) surveys were returned (633 obstetricians and gynecologists (Ob/Gyns), 571 family practitioners, and 410 internists). Only a minority of the physicians (16%) would offer EPT to menopausal women in the absence of menopausal symptoms (26% Ob/Gyn, 11% family practitioners, 6% internists, p<0.0001). However, many physicians (62%) believed that EPT could be offered "short term" to menopausal women with menopausal symptoms assuming no contraindications (82% Ob/Gyn, 54% family practitioners, 42% internists; p<0.0001). Irrespective of specialty, the strongest contraindications to EPT use reported by these physicians were personal history of breast cancer (93%), thrombosis (92%), cerebrovascular disease (84%), ischemic heart disease (74%), uterine cancer (73%), as well as women's subjective "concern" about breast cancer (57%). Procedures reported as always required by physicians for continuing women on EPT were breast examination (97%), mammogram (96%), blood pressure measurement (94%), and pelvic examination (91%). Internists and family practitioners address more contraindications to EPT use than Ob-Gyns. Although many physicians appear to be accepting of short-term use of EPT for menopausal indications in the absence of contraindications, the majority would not prescribe it for prophylactic purposes.
    Maturitas 02/2007; 56(1):30-7. DOI:10.1016/j.maturitas.2006.05.003 · 2.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The publication of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study had significant impact on the attitude of physicians and patients towards the use of hormones in the menopause. It has been estimated that 40-83% of patients using hormones ceased treatment on their own initiative following publication of the WHI results. While in the pre-WHI period, use of hormones in the menopause was termed 'hormone-replacement therapy' (HRT) with an emphasis on replacement; 'HRT' has now been replaced with the term 'hormone therapy' (HT), focusing on the therapy's status as a treatment with defined risks and benefits. Following the publication of the WHI study, many caregivers concluded that HT had absolutely no role in clinical practice. However, the decision to begin HT for the symptomatic, healthy, newly postmenopausal woman should be based on whether the WHI study addresses all the issues that must be taken into consideration before initiation of HT, whether there are effective alternatives available to relieve climacteric symptoms, and also whether HT is better able to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) than to halt atherosclerotic lesions. Every postmenopausal woman should have an individual risk-benefit evaluation to determine whether HT suits her needs. Until the effectiveness of HT for primary prevention of CVD and AD is established or disproved, there is no justification for HT use in the asymptomatic postmenopausal woman. However, symptomatic newly menopausal women might experience relief of their climacteric symptoms following HT use without exposing themselves to unreasonable risks.
    Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica 02/2006; 85(4):387-93. DOI:10.1080/00016340600604278 · 1.99 Impact Factor