How evidence-based practices contribute to community integration.

Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, 402 N. Blackford St., LD 124, Indianapolis, IN 46202-3275, USA.
Community Mental Health Journal (Impact Factor: 1.03). 01/2005; 40(6):569-88. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-004-6130-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Since the groundbreaking work of the Robert Wood Johnson Conference in 1998 identifying six evidence-based practices (EBPs) for people with severe mental illness (SMI), the mental health field has moved in the direction of re-examination and redesign of service systems. Surprisingly, one area that has not been fully explicated is the role that EBPs play in promoting community integration. In this paper, we explain how community integration is a unifying concept providing direction and vision for community mental health for people with SMI. As one crucial aspect of the recovery process, community integration clarifies the link between EBPs and recovery. We propose an alternate view, grounded in the empirical literature, to the assertion by Anthony, Rogers, and Farkas [2003, Community Mental Health Journal, 39, 101-114] that "EBP research has rarely demonstrated a positive impact on recovery related outcomes."

Download full-text


Available from: Gary R Bond, Jun 30, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Community integration research explores community contexts and factors that encourage or hinder individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) from actively participating in community life. This research agenda can be advanced by using mixed-methods that better document the relationships between contextual factors and individual experience. Two such methods were applied to a mixed-methods study of 40 adults with SMI living in independent housing in the Southeastern United States. Their contextualized experiences of community integration were measured by applying innovative participatory mapping and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping techniques. Use of these methods in conjunction with one another facilitated the creation of activity spaces, which can measure geographic accessibility and help to represent an individual's experience of place and degree of mobility. The utility of these newly applied methods for better understanding community integration for persons with SMI is explored and implications for using these measures in research and practice are discussed.
    Health & Place 11/2008; 15(2):520-31. DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.08.011 · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Services for dual diagnosis patients are strained by reductions in hospital-based inpatient treatment facilities and the lengths of inpatient stays in order to reduce health care costs. Aims: This study evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of community-and hospital-based acute residential treatment for dually disordered patients, and whether moderately-ill patients benefitted more from community care, and severely-ill patients from hospital care. Method: Patients (N ¼ 230) with dual substance use and psychiatric disorders were randomly assigned to community or hospital acute care programs that had the same level of service-intensity. They were followed for 1 year (80%) using the Addiction Severity Index. Patients' health care utilization was assessed from charts, VA databases, and health care diaries; costs were assigned using methods established by the VA Health Economics Resource Center. Results: Patients had better substance use outcomes when they were initially assigned to community rather than to hospital acute care. Patients assigned to hospital care had shorter index stays, but these index stays were more costly than were the longer index stays of patients assigned to community care. Patients assigned to hospital care also had more mental health follow-up outpatient visits, and more costly mental health follow-up stays, over the study year. Conclusions: Cost savings may be achieved without loss of benefit to all but the most decompensated dually disordered patients by shifting the locus of acute treatment from hospital to community care.
    Journal of Mental Health 01/2006; 15(2). DOI:10.1080/09638230600559631 · 1.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents a vision for a more effective system of care for people with severe mental illness. It begins by identifying common features of evidence-based practices. It is now clear that an optimal system of care involves much tighter integration of treatment, rehabilitation, and support services than is now generally available in Canada. Integrated local mental health centres could provide an effective structure for such services.
    Canadian Public Policy 01/2005; 31(s1):47-52. · 0.38 Impact Factor