Elective surgery after acute diverticulitis

Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
British Journal of Surgery (Impact Factor: 5.21). 02/2005; 92(2):133-42. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4873
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Diverticulitis is a common condition. Practice guidelines from many organizations recommend bowel resection after two attacks. The evidence for such a recommendation is reviewed.
A Medline literature search was performed to locate English language articles on surgery for diverticular disease. Further articles were obtained from the references cited in the literature initially reviewed.
Most people with diverticulosis are asymptomatic. Diverticular disease occurs in over 25 per cent of the population, increasing with age. After one episode of diverticulitis one-third of patients have recurrent symptoms; after a second episode a further third have a subsequent episode. Perforation is commonest during the first episode of acute diverticulitis. After recovering from an episode of diverticulitis the risk of an individual requiring an urgent Hartmann's procedure is one in 2000 patient-years of follow-up. Surgery for diverticular disease has a high complication rate and 25 per cent of patients have ongoing symptoms after bowel resection.
There is no evidence to support the idea that elective surgery should follow two attacks of diverticulitis. Further prospective trials are required.


Available from: Frank Antony Frizelle, Jun 02, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The ideal treatment of perforated diverticulitis and the indications for elective colon resection remain controversial. Considering the significant morbidity and mortality rates related to traditional resection, efforts have been made to reduce the invasiveness of surgery in recent decades. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage has emerged as an effective alternative option. We retrospectively investigated the effectiveness of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated diverticulitis and the possibility that it could be a definitive treatment. We included patients treated with laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated diverticulitis. The inclusion criteria were all emergency patients with generalized peritonitis due to Hinchey III perforated diverticulitis and some cases of Hinchey II and IV. Sixty-three patients were treated with laparoscopic peritoneal lavage. Six patients (9.5 %) had Hinchey II diverticulitis; 54 patients (85.7 %) had Hinchey III; and three patients (4.8 %) had Hinchey IV. The mean operative time was 87.3 min (±25.4 min), and the overall morbidity rate was 14.3 %. One patient died because of pulmonary embolism, and there were six early reinterventions because of treatment failure. Delayed colon resection was performed in four of the remaining 57 patients (7 %) because of recurrent diverticulitis. In the other 53 patients (93 %), we saw no recurrence of diverticulitis and no intervention was performed after a median follow-up period of 54 months (interquartile range 27-98 months). Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated diverticulitis can be considered a safe and effective alternative to traditional surgical resection, and using this approach, most elective colon resection might be avoided.
    Techniques in Coloproctology 12/2014; 19(2). DOI:10.1007/s10151-014-1258-1 · 1.34 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Colonic diverticular disease is a common condition, and around a quarter of people affected by it will experience acute symptoms at some time. The most common presentation is uncomplicated acute diverticulitis that can be managed conservatively with bowel rest and antibiotics. However, some patients will present with diverticular abscesses or purulent or faeculent peritonitis due to perforated diverticular disease. Whilst most mesocolic abscesses can be managed with percutaneous drainage alone, pelvic abscesses are associated with a higher rate of future complications and usually require percutaneous drainage followed by interval sigmoid resection. Patients who require emergency surgery for complicated acute diverticulitis most commonly undergo a Hartmann's procedure, although resection with primary anastomosis and laparoscopic peritoneal lavage have emerged as alternative treatment options for patients with purulent peritonitis in recent years. However, robust evidence from randomized trials is lacking for these alternative procedures, and the studies that have reported good outcomes from them have included carefully selected patient groups. There has been a move away from recommending elective prophylactic colectomy after two episodes of acute diverticulitis in the light of evidence that most patients will not experience a significant recurrence of their symptoms; elective surgery is indicated for those with ongoing symptoms, pelvic abscesses, complications-such as fistulating disease, strictures or recurrent diverticular bleeding-and those who are at high risk of perforation during future episodes, for example, due to immunosuppression, chronic renal failure or collagen-vascular diseases.
    Indian Journal of Surgery 12/2014; 76(6):429-35. DOI:10.1007/s12262-014-1086-6 · 0.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is a controversial and difficult problem for a surgeon to manage the simultaneously occurring diseases divirticular abscess and abdominal aortic aneurysm. Mostly surgeons are not willing to execute a non vascular procedures during the repair of an aneurysm because there can be a risk of graft infection. In this case study, we have explained about the presentation of a huge infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) that is found to be associated with a divirticular abscess and both needed an intervention. It has been suggested by various evidences that a one-stage elective surgical treatment is safer and cost effective for the treatment of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with other problems like gastro-intestinal malignancies. However, the high risk of graft infection made the two staged procedure a popular option. The major dilemma is in the management of patients with large aneurysm which require an urgent repair and presented with concomitant pathologies that carry a high risk of sepsis. In this case report, we described an unusual presentation of a large aneurysm with a concomitant divirticular abscess where both needed an urgent intervention. Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
    12/2014; 7C:39-41. DOI:10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.10.022