Article

Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Emergency Resuscitation Center and Section of Emergency Medicine, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Ill 60637, USA.
Circulation (Impact Factor: 14.95). 03/2005; 111(4):428-34. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000153811.84257.59
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Recent data highlight a vital link between well-performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and survival after cardiac arrest; however, the quality of CPR as actually performed by trained healthcare providers is largely unknown. We sought to measure in-hospital chest compression rates and to determine compliance with published international guidelines.
We developed and validated a handheld recording device to measure chest compression rate as a surrogate for CPR quality. A prospective observational study of adult cardiac arrests was performed at 3 hospitals from April 2002 to October 2003. Resuscitations were witnessed by trained observers using a customized personal digital assistant programmed to store the exact time of each chest compression, allowing offline calculation of compression rates at serial time points. In 97 arrests, data from 813 minutes during which chest compressions were delivered were analyzed in 30-second time segments. In 36.9% of the total number of segments, compression rates were <80 compressions per minute (cpm), and 21.7% had rates <70 cpm. Higher chest compression rates were significantly correlated with initial return of spontaneous circulation (mean chest compression rates for initial survivors and nonsurvivors, 90+/-17 and 79+/-18 cpm, respectively; P=0.0033).
In-hospital chest compression rates were below published resuscitation recommendations, and suboptimal compression rates in our study correlated with poor return of spontaneous circulation. CPR quality is likely a critical determinant of survival after cardiac arrest, suggesting the need for routine measurement, monitoring, and feedback systems during actual resuscitation.

1 Follower
 · 
81 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The U.S. national out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates, although improving recently, have remained suboptimal despite the collective efforts of individuals, communities, and professional societies. Only until very recently, and still with inconsistency, has focus been placed specifically on survival with pre-arrest neurologic function. The reality of current approaches to sudden cardiac arrest is that they are often lacking an integrative, multi-disciplinary approach, and without deserved funding and outcome analysis. In this manuscript, a multidisciplinary group of authors propose practice, process, technology, and policy initiatives to improve cardiac arrest survival with a focus on neurologic function.
    The western journal of emergency medicine 11/2014; 15(7):803-7. DOI:10.5811/westjem.2014.6.21832
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Information about a real patient is presented in stages (boldface type) to expert clinicians (Dr Oliver Ritter and Dr Ralf Michael Muellenbach), who respond to the information, sharing their reasoning with the reader (regular type). A discussion by the authors follows. A 63-year-old white male was admitted with recurring chest pain of increasing intensity for approximate to 3 days. He had a known history of arterial hypertension and was obese, with a body mass index of 29.4 kg/m(2). After seeking help at his family physician he was immediately transferred to our hospital using emergency medical services because of ST-segment elevations. On arrival he had severe chest pain with dyspnea and a lowered blood pressure of 90/60 mm Hg. On auscultation moist rales could be heard over both lungs, whereas heart sounds were normal. The abdomen was nondistended with normal bowel sounds and no palpable organomegaly. His extremities were warm and exhibited peripheral edemas on both sides. The ECG displayed sinus tachycardia at 102/min with posteroinferior ST-segment elevations and reciprocal ST-segment depressions in leads I, aV(L), V-2 and V-3. Bedside echocardiographic assessment showed severely depressed biventricular function with a left ventricular ejection fraction of approximate to 15% and a dilated right ventricle measuring a tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) of approximate to 1 cm. All heart valves were normal, and no signs of pericardial effusion could be observed.
    Circulation 09/2014; 130(13):1095-104. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009270 · 14.95 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: The combination of the LUCAS 2 (L-CPR) automated CPR device and an impedance threshold device (ITD) has been widely implemented in the clinical field. This animal study tested the hypothesis that the addition of an ITD on L-CPR would enhance cerebral and coronary perfusion pressures. Methods: Ten female pigs (39.0 +/- 2.0 kg) were sedated, intubated, anesthetized with isofluorane, and paralyzed with succinylcholine (93.3 mu g/kg/min) to inhibit the potential confounding effect of gasping. After 4 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation, 4 min of L-CPR + an active ITD or L-CPR + a sham ITD was initiated and followed by another 4 min of the alternative method of CPR. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), diastolic right atrial pressure (RAP), intracranial pressure (ICP), airway pressure, and end tidal CO2 (ETCO2) were recorded continuously. Data expressed as mean mmHg +/- SD. Results: Decompression phase airway pressure was significantly lower with L-CPR + active ITD versus L-CPR + sham ITD (-5.3 +/- 2.2 vs. -0.5 +/- 0.6; p < 0.001). L-CPR + active ITD treatment resulted in significantly improved hemodynamics versus L-CPR + sham ITD: ETCO2, 35 +/- 6 vs. 29 +/- 7 (p = 0.015); SBP, 99 +/- 9 vs. 93 +/- 15 (p = 0.050); DBP, 24 +/- 12 vs. 19 +/- 15 (p = 0.006); coronary perfusion pressure, 29 +/- 8 vs. 26 +/- 7 (p = 0.004) and cerebral perfusion pressure, 24 +/- 13 vs. 21 +/- 12 (p = 0.028). Conclusions: In pigs undergoing L-CPR the addition of the active ITD significantly reduced intrathoracic pressure and increased vital organ perfusion pressures.
    Resuscitation 09/2014; 85(12). DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.013 · 3.96 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
7 Downloads
Available from
Nov 23, 2014