Article

Modelling bioconcentration of pesticides in fish using biopartitioning micellar chromatography

University of Valencia, Valenza, Valencia, Spain
Journal of Chromatography A (Impact Factor: 4.26). 01/2005; 1063(1-2):153-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.11.074
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Ecotoxicity assessment is essential before placing new chemical substances on the market. An investigation of the use of the chromatographic retention (log k) in biopartitioning micellar chromatography (BMC) as an in vitro approach to evaluate the bioconcentration factor (BCF) of pesticides in fish is proposed. A heterogeneous set of 85 pesticides from six chemical families was used. For pesticides exhibiting bioconcentration in fish (experimental log BCF > 2), a quantitative retention-activity relationships (QRAR) model is able to perform precise log BCF estimations of new pesticides. Considering the present data, the results based on log k seem to be more reliable than those from available software (BCFWIN and KOWWIN) and from log P (quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR)). It is also possible to perform risk assessment tasks fixing a threshold value for log k, which substitute two common threshold values, log P and experimental log BCF, avoiding the experimental problems related with these two parameters.

0 Followers
 · 
234 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The retention factor (log k) in the biopartitioning micellar chromatography (BMC) of 79 heterogeneous pesticides was studied by quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) method. Heuristic method (HM) and support vector machine (SVM) method were used to build linear and nonlinear models, respectively. Compared the results of these two methods, those obtained by the SVM model are much better. For the test set, a predictive correlation coefficient (R) of 0.9755 and root-mean-square (RMS) error of 0.1403 were obtained. The proposed QSPR models, both by HM and SVM, contain the same descriptors that agree with the classical Abraham parameters of well-known linear solvation energy relationships (LSER).
    Journal of Chromatography A 05/2006; 1113(1-2):140-7. DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.01.136 · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • Molecular Diversity 06/2006; 10(2):93-4. DOI:10.1007/s11030-006-9025-5 · 2.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We developed a n-hexane/surfactant-containing water solvent system in counter-current chromatography (CCC) in order to separate hydrophobic compounds. By using the upper phase as the mobile phase, we have separated steroid samples. Retention times of steroids progesterone and delta4-androstene-3,17-dione increased slightly by increasing the concentration below the critical micellar concentration (CMC) of surfactant sodium 1-heptanesulfonate. However, the retention times increased drastically while the SHS concentrations were above the CMC. The partition of these two steroids in the two phases was significantly dependent on the interaction with micelles. Aromatic hydrocarbons were not retained by the lower phase no matter what the surfactant concentrations were. Their hydrophobic interaction with n-hexane greatly exceeded that with the micellar solution. The retention times of esters, however, were only slightly affected by the surfactant addition even above the CMC. The weaker interaction between esters and the micellar solution was probably due to their higher polarity. The micellar solvent systems provide an alternative way for hydrophobic sample separations in CCC, but the performance is limited.
    Journal of Chromatography A 09/2006; 1123(1):66-70. DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.05.007 · 4.26 Impact Factor
Show more