The rise and fall of priming: How visual exposure shapes cortical representations of objects

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Cerebral Cortex (Impact Factor: 8.67). 12/2005; 15(11):1655-65. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhi060
Source: PubMed


How does the amount of time for which we see an object influence the nature and content of its cortical representation? To address this question, we varied the duration of initial exposure to visual objects and then measured functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal and behavioral performance during a subsequent repeated presentation of these objects. We report a novel 'rise-and-fall' pattern relating exposure duration and the corresponding magnitude of fMRI cortical signal. Compared with novel objects, repeated objects elicited maximal cortical response reduction when initially presented for 250 ms. Counter-intuitively, initially seeing an object for a longer duration significantly reduced the magnitude of this effect. This 'rise-and-fall' pattern was also evident for the corresponding behavioral priming. To account for these findings, we propose that the earlier interval of an exposure to a visual stimulus results in a fine-tuning of the cortical response, while additional exposure promotes selection of a subset of key features for continued representation. These two independent mechanisms complement each other in shaping object representations with experience.

9 Reads
  • Source
    • "The present behavioral results are consistent with the fMRI results of Zago et al . ( 2005 ) that longer presentations of picture primes decrease the magnitude of neural repetition suppression in cortical regions typically associated with non - perceptual processes ( anterior temporal and inferior frontal regions ) . Taken together , these results provide strong evidence about the temporal dynamics of high - level stimulus re"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A short prime presentation has been shown to provide a greater priming magnitude, whereas a longer prime presentation results in a lower priming magnitude. In Experiment 1, we attempted to replicate the decrease of priming using word stimuli. Words were presented in both prime and test sessions, and participants judged whether each stimulus was natural or manmade. In Experiment 2, we employed a cross-domain priming paradigm to assess the impact of prime duration on non-perceptual processes. Pictures were presented in prime sessions, and their semantically matched words were presented in test sessions. We did not observe a significant decrease in priming in Experiment 1. However, we found that 2000 ms of prime exposure led to weaker cross-domain priming when compared with 250 ms of the exposure in Experiment 2. The results suggest that the longer presentation of pictures causes a non-perceptual adaptation effect. This effect may occur at conceptual, linguistic, and/or response-related levels.
    Frontiers in Psychology 08/2015; 6:1040. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01040 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Both RS and priming are incremental in nature, enhancing their effects as a function of the number of presentations of a stimulus [2], [7]. Also, duration of stimulus presentation at encoding influences RS and priming at retrieval in almost identical patterns [8]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Repeated visual processing of an unfamiliar face suppresses neural activity in face-specific areas of the occipito-temporal cortex. This "repetition suppression" (RS) is a primitive mechanism involved in learning of unfamiliar faces, which can be detected through amplitude reduction of the N170 event-related potential (ERP). The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) exerts top-down influence on early visual processing. However, its contribution to N170 RS and learning of unfamiliar faces remains unclear. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) transiently increases or decreases cortical excitability, as a function of polarity. We hypothesized that DLPFC excitability modulation by tDCS would cause polarity-dependent modulations of N170 RS during encoding of unfamiliar faces. tDCS-induced N170 RS enhancement would improve long-term recognition reaction time (RT) and/or accuracy rates, whereas N170 RS impairment would compromise recognition ability. Participants underwent three tDCS conditions in random order at ∼72 hour intervals: right anodal/left cathodal, right cathodal/left anodal and sham. Immediately following tDCS conditions, an EEG was recorded during encoding of unfamiliar faces for assessment of P100 and N170 visual ERPs. The P3a component was analyzed to detect prefrontal function modulation. Recognition tasks were administered ∼72 hours following encoding. Results indicate the right anodal/left cathodal condition facilitated N170 RS and induced larger P3a amplitudes, leading to faster recognition RT. Conversely, the right cathodal/left anodal condition caused N170 amplitude and RTs to increase, and a delay in P3a latency. These data demonstrate that DLPFC excitability modulation can influence early visual encoding of unfamiliar faces, highlighting the importance of DLPFC in basic learning mechanisms.
    PLoS ONE 12/2013; 8(12):e81721. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0081721 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In contrast, the accuracy of recognition improves roughly as a log-linear function as study time increases (Tversky and Sherman, 1975; Loftus and Kallman, 1979), including on the brief time scale of 250 ms to 2 s (Ellis et al., 1977) used to study priming by Zago et al. (2005). We therefore reasoned that manipulating study duration for objects could exert opposite effects on priming and recognition . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Amnesic patients have difficulties recognizing when stimuli are repeated, even though their responses to stimuli can change as a function of repetition in indirect tests of memory - a pattern known as priming without recognition. Likewise, experimental manipulations can impair recognition in healthy individuals while leaving priming relatively unaffected, and priming and recognition have been associated with distinct neural correlates in these circumstances. Does this evidence necessarily indicate that priming and recognition rely on distinct brain systems? An alternative explanation is that recognition is merely more sensitive to amnestic insults and experimental manipulations than is priming, and that both priming and recognition are produced by a single brain system. If so, then experimental manipulations would tend to drive priming and recognition in the same direction, albeit to a greater extent for one versus the other in some circumstances. We found evidence to the contrary - that manipulating study duration has opposite effects on priming versus recognition. Studying objects for one-quarter second led to worse recognition than studying objects for 2 s, whereas the opposite was true for priming (greater for one-quarter-second study than two-second study). Furthermore, distinct electrophysiological repetition effects were associated with priming versus recognition. We therefore conclude that study duration had opposite effects on priming and recognition, and on the engagement of implicit versus explicit memory systems. These findings call into question single-process accounts of priming and recognition, and substantiate previous behavioral, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging dissociations between implicit and explicit memory.
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12/2010; 4:227. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00227 · 3.63 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications

Full-text (2 Sources)

9 Reads
Available from
May 27, 2014