Article

The role of the liposomal anthracyclines and other systemic therapies in the management of advanced breast cancer.

The Cancer Center, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Seminars in Oncology (Impact Factor: 4.33). 01/2005; 31(6 Suppl 13):106-46. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.09.018
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT For patients whose breast cancers are not responsive to endocrine therapy, there are a large number of cytotoxic drugs that will induce a response. In spite of the introduction of new, very active drugs such as the taxanes, vinorelbine, capecitabine, gemcitabine, and trastuzumab, the anthracyclines are still as active as any--and more active than most--drugs used to treat breast cancer. Their inclusion in combinations to treat early and advanced disease prolongs survival. However, they cause nausea, vomiting, alopecia, myelosuppression, mucositis, and cardiomyopathies. There is no evidence that increasing the dose of conventional anthracyclines or any other of the cytotoxics beyond standard doses will improve outcomes. Schedule may be more important than dose in determining the benefit of cytotoxics used to treat breast cancer. Weekly schedules and continuous infusions of 5-fluorouracil and doxorubicin may have some advantages over more intermittent schedules. Liposomal formations of doxorubicin reduce toxicity, including cardiotoxicity; theoretically they should also be more effective because of better targeting of tumor over normal tissues. Both pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil/Caelyx [PLD]) and liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet [NPLD]) appeared to be as effective as conventional doxorubicin and much less toxic in multiple phase II and phase III studies. PLD has been evaluated in combinations with cyclophosphamide, the taxanes, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and trastuzumab, and NPLD has been evaluated in combination with cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab. Both liposomal anthracyclines are less cardiotoxic than conventional doxorubicin. The optimal dose of PLD is lower than that of conventional doxorubicin or NPLD. Patients treated with PLD have almost no alopecia, nausea, or vomiting, but its use is associated with stomatitis and hand-foot syndrome, which can be avoided or minimized with the use of proper dose-schedules. In contrast, the optimal dose-schedule of NPLD is nearly identical to that of conventional doxorubicin. The toxicity profile of NPLD is similar to that of conventional doxorubicin, but toxicities are less severe and NPLD is better tolerated than conventional doxorubicin at higher doses.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
82 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nanotechnology-based chemotherapeutics and imaging agents represent a new era of "cancer nanomedicine" working to deliver versatile payloads with favorable pharmacokinetics and capitalize on molecular and cellular targeting for enhanced specificity, efficacy, and safety. Despite the versatility of many nanomedicine-based platforms, translating new drug or imaging agents to the clinic is costly and often hampered by regulatory hurdles. Therefore, translating cancer nanomedicine may largely be application-defined, where materials are adapted only toward specific indications where their properties confer unique advantages. This strategy may also realize therapies that can optimize clinical impact through combinatorial nanomedicine. In this review, we discuss how particular materials lend themselves to specific applications, the progress to date in clinical translation of nanomedicine, and promising approaches that may catalyze clinical acceptance of nano.
    Science translational medicine 12/2013; 5(216):216rv4. · 10.76 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Today, researchers are constantly developing new nanomaterials, nanodevices, and nanoparticles to meet unmet needs in the delivery of therapeutic agents and imaging agents for cancer therapy and diagnosis, respectively. Of particular interest here are lipid-based nanoparticles (LNPs) that are genuine particles (approximately 100 nm in dimension) assembled from varieties of lipid and other chemical components that act collectively to overcome biological barriers (biobarriers), in order for LNPs to preferentially accumulate in or around disease-target cells for the functional delivery of therapeutic agents for treatment or of imaging agents for diagnosis. The capabilities of these LNPs will clearly vary depending on functional requirements, but the nanoscale allows for an impressive level of diversity in capabilities to enable corresponding LNPs to address an equally diverse range of functional requirements. Accordingly, LNPs should be considered appropriate vehicles to provide an integrated, personalized approach to cancer diagnosis and therapy in future cancer disease management.
    Journal of drug delivery. 01/2013; 2013:165981.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Recent biopharma deals related to nanocarrier drug delivery technologies highlight the emergence of nanomedicine. This is perhaps an expected culmination of many years of research demonstrating the potential of nanomedicine as the next generation of therapeutics with improved performance. PEGylated nanocarriers play a key role within this field. Areas covered: The drug delivery advantages of nanomedicines in general are discussed, focusing on nanocarriers and PEGylated nanomedicines, including products under current development/clinical evaluation. Well-established drug delivery benefits of PEGylation (e.g., prolonged circulation) are only briefly covered. Instead, attention is deliberately made to less commonly reported advantages of PEGylation, including mucosal delivery of nanomedicines. Finally, some of the issues related to the safety of PEGylated nanomedicines in clinical application are discussed. Expert opinion: The advent of nanomedicine providing therapeutic options of refined performance continues. Although PEGylation as a tool to improve the pharmacokinetics of nanomedicines is well established and is used clinically, other benefits of 'PEGnology', including enhancement of physicochemical properties and/or biocompatibility of actives and/or drug carriers, as well as mucosal delivery, have attracted less attention. While concerns regarding the clinical use of PEGylated nanomedicines remain, evidence suggests that at least some safety issues may be controlled by adequate designs of nanosystems.
    Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 12/2013; · 4.87 Impact Factor