Assessing the Quality of Preparation for Posthospital Care from the Patient's Perspective: The Care Transitions Measure

Division of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80011, USA.
Medical Care (Impact Factor: 2.94). 04/2005; 43(3):246-55.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Evidence that both quality and patient safety are jeopardized for patients undergoing transitions across care settings continues to expand. Performance measurement is one potential strategy towards improving the quality of transitional care. A valid and reliable self-report measure of the quality of care transitions is needed that is both consistent with the concept of patient-centeredness and useful for the purpose of performance measurement and quality improvement.
We sought to develop and test a self-report measure of the quality of care transitions that captures the patient's perspective and has demonstrated utility for quality improvement.
Patients aged 18 years and older discharged from one of the 3 hospitals of a vertically integrated health system were included.
Cross-sectional assessment of factor structure, dimensionality, and construct validity.
The Care Transitions Measure (CTM), a 15-item uni-dimensional measure of the quality of preparation for care transitions, was found to have high internal consistency, reliability, and reflect 4 focus group-derived content domains. The measure was shown to discriminate between patients discharged from the hospital who did and did not have a subsequent emergency department visit or rehospitalization for their index condition. CTM scores were significantly different between health care facilities known to vary in level of system integration.
The CTM not only provides meaningful, patient-centered insight into the quality of care transitions, but because of the association between CTM scores and undesirable utilization outcomes, it also provides information that may be useful to clinicians, hospital administrators, quality improvement entities, and third party payers.

1 Follower
  • Source
    • "There is little incentive for hospitals, SNFs and other providers to coordinate beneficiaries' care and address wasteful rehospitalizations that occur as a result of inadequate clinical information sharing, inappropriate post-acute placements or other inefficiencies across providers.[4] [5] [6] Moreover, in the case of many nursing home residents who have lived in a facility for some time (i.e., long-stay residents), this issue is further magnified given Medicaid's role as the primary payer of nursing home care. Given Medicare's coverage of SNF and hospital services, there are often perverse incentives for both providers and payers to shift costs across settings for dually-eligible beneficiaries.[7] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Almost one-fourth of Medicare beneficiaries discharged from the hospital to a skilled nursing facility were readmitted to the hospital within thirty days; this cost Medicare $4.34 billion in 2006. Especially in an elderly population, cycling into and out of hospitals can be emotionally upsetting and can increase the likelihood of medical errors related to care coordination. Payment incentives in Medicare do not encourage providers to coordinate beneficiaries' care. Revising these incentives could achieve major savings for providers and improved quality of life for beneficiaries.
    Health Affairs 01/2010; 29(1):57-64. DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0629 · 4.64 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Richards and Coast's (2003) review into postdischarge care revealed that a combination of needs assessment, coordinated DP and a method for facilitating implementation of these plans was more effective in maintaining continuity of care than services that do not include posthospital follow-up. An American research team developed and validated an instrument to measure the quality of care transitions from the patient's perspective as a basis for quality improvement in posthospital care (Coleman et al. 2005). Their Care "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate general surgical patients' perspectives of the adequacy and appropriateness of their discharge planning. To identify any aspects of discharge planning that could be strengthened to assist people in managing their posthospital care and maintaining continuity of care. Appropriate discharge planning is a priority in today's healthcare environment in which patients are discharged 'quicker and sicker', sometimes without home support. Adequate and appropriate discharge planning helps promote health literacy, which has benefits for both patients and their caregivers in helping them manage postsurgical recovery at home. A qualitative, interpretive study was designed in which patients were interviewed at least one week after they returned home from hospital. Purposeful sampling was used to interview 13 general surgical patients from one of three hospitals (two public and one private) in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Data were collected in unstructured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. Reflective analysis by individual research team members generated preliminary themes, which were then analysed collectively by all members of the research team to achieve consensus on patients' perspectives. Themes included a 'one-size-fits-all' approach to providing discharge information; inconsistent or variable advice from different health professionals; a lack of predischarge assessment of their home and/or work conditions and the need for follow-up assessment of patient and carer needs. The findings of this study illuminate the need for a more individualized approach to discharge planning, taking into account the patient's age, gender, surgical procedure and family and community support for immediate and longer-term nursing follow-up. Patients would be more adequately prepared for their recovery period at home, by encouraging client-centred, interdisciplinary communication between health practitioners; adopting a flexible, approach to discharge planning which is tailored to individual needs of postsurgical patients, particularly in relation to advice and information related to recovery; and encouraging and supporting adequate health literacy for self-management.
    Journal of Clinical Nursing 10/2007; 16(9):1602-9. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01725.x · 1.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patient discharges from the hospital often occur late in the day and are frequently clustered after 4 PM. When inpatients leave earlier in the day, quality is improved because new admissions awaiting beds are able to leave the emergency department sooner and emergency department waiting room backlog is reduced. Nursing staff, whose work patterns traditionally result in high activity of discharge and admission between 5 PM and 8 PM, benefit by spreading out their work across a longer part of the day. Discharging patients earlier in the day also has the potential to increase patient satisfaction. Despite multiple stakeholders in the discharge planning process, physicians play the most important role. Getting physician buy-in requires an ability to teach physicians about the concept of early-in-the-day discharges and their impact on the process. We defined a new physician-centered discharge planning process and introduced it to an internal medicine team with an identical control team as a comparison. Discharge time of day was analyzed for 1 month. Mean time of day of discharge was 13:39 for the intervention group versus 15:45 for the control group (P<.001). If reproduced successfully, this process could improve quality at an important transition point in patient care.
    The health care manager 04/2007; 26(2):142-6. DOI:10.1097/01.HCM.0000268617.33491.60
Show more