Article

Quantification of dental plaque in the research environment

The University of Manchester, Turner Dental School, Unit of Prosthodontics, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6SH, UK.
Journal of Dentistry (Impact Factor: 2.84). 04/2005; 33(3):193-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.017
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To review the established and novel methods of plaque quantification employed in dental research, including a discussion of their merits and to present a new method of planimetrically measuring plaque using light induced fluorescence.
Quantitative light-fluorescence (QLF) images were acquired from the buccal surfaces of an individual who had refrained from oral hygiene both with and without traditional plaque disclosure. Digital photographs were also taken. Images were analysed using a novel method and a percentage plaque index produced.
Traditional plaque indices are problematic due to their integral nature and their failure to detect small, but potentially clinically relevant changes in plaque area. The use of a fluorescent technique demonstrated good reliability although there was no correlation between red fluorescent plaque and total disclosed plaque suggesting that the auto-fluorescing plaque is not a good measure of total plaque volume.
The use of planimetric techniques can increase the power of plaque studies, potentially reducing the number of subjects and time required to separate therapies or products. Fluorescent methods of quantification have potential as they enable clear separation of the plaque covered and non-covered tooth surfaces.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Sue M Higham, Aug 13, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
207 Views
  • Source
    • "The technique uses a small camera that can be easily handheld; the images are free from flash-light specular reflections and major distortions. Additionally, the QLF technique enables very small changes in plaque to be detected, thus increasing accuracy [7]. Going beyond mere detection, QLF can monitor the development or regression of caries and plaque over time. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Biofilm is a formation of microbial material on tooth substrata. Several methods to quantify dental biofilm coverage have recently been reported in the literature, but at best they provide a semi-automated approach to quantification with significant input from a human grader that comes with the grader’s bias of what is foreground, background, biofilm, and tooth. Additionally, human assessment indices limit the resolution of the quantification scale; most commercial scales use five levels of quantification for biofilm coverage (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%). On the other hand, current state-of-theart techniques in automatic plaque quantification fail to make their way into practical applications owing to their inability to incorporate human input to handle misclassifications. This paper proposes a new interactive method for biofilm quantification in Quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) images of canine teeth that is independent of the perceptual bias of the grader. The method partitions a QLF image into segments of uniform texture and intensity called superpixels; every superpixel is statistically modeled as a realization of a single 2D Gaussian Markov random field (GMRF) whose parameters are estimated; the superpixel is then assigned to one of three classes (background, biofilm, tooth substratum) based on the training set of data. The quantification results show a high degree of consistency and precision. At the same time, the proposed method gives pathologists full control to post-process the automatic quantification by flipping misclassified superpixels to a different state (background, tooth, biofilm) with a single click, providing greater usability than simply marking the boundaries of biofilm and tooth as done by current state-of-the- art methods.
    IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 09/2014; 19(1). DOI:10.1109/JBHI.2014.2310204 · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "It has been suggested that obligate anaerobic bacteria are the source of red fl uorescence, so the detection of red fl uorescent plaque may indicate a more mature plaque community. Red fl uorescence was detected in denture plaque as previously indicated for dental plaque [Pretty et al., 2005], although P. gingivalis was not isolated . Both primary and secondary colonisers fl uoresced green, but the red and orange fl uorescent isolates are particularly associated with more mature plaque [Marsh and Martin, 1999]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to determine the microbiological origin of plaque fluorescence observed during quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) analysis. Plaque was sampled from dentures, because of easy accessibility and the homogeneous background provided by the denture tooth during imaging, and the acknowledged comparability to occlusal plaque. Forty removable poly(methyl methacrylate) dentures were screened for the presence of fluorescent plaque deposits during QLF analysis. Dentures were photographed, QLF images were recorded and samples of fluorescent plaque were taken. Plaque samples were cultured on fastidious anaerobe agar, Wilkins Chalgren agar and Sabourauds dextrose agar. Plates were screened under QLF and fluorescent colonies were subcultured and identified. Areas of red, orange and green fluorescence were detected on the fitting and non-fitting surfaces of dentures. The red and orange fluorescing species were Prevotella melaninogenica, Actinomyces israelii and Candida albicans, which are generally acknowledged to be secondary colonisers, present in more mature plaque. Green fluorescence was observed in streptococcal species (early colonisers) and Fusobacterium nucleatum (important organism in plaque development). Non-fluorescent colonies were also cultured. Plaque which accumulates on susceptible surfaces tends to be associated with caries, but it may be its maturity, rather than the presence of cariogenic streptococci, that is more likely to provide a microbiological link between red fluorescence and caries.
    Caries Research 02/2006; 40(2):112-6. DOI:10.1159/000091056 · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
Show more