Quantification of dental plaque in the research environment.

The University of Manchester, Turner Dental School, Unit of Prosthodontics, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6SH, UK.
Journal of Dentistry (Impact Factor: 2.84). 04/2005; 33(3):193-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.017
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To review the established and novel methods of plaque quantification employed in dental research, including a discussion of their merits and to present a new method of planimetrically measuring plaque using light induced fluorescence.
Quantitative light-fluorescence (QLF) images were acquired from the buccal surfaces of an individual who had refrained from oral hygiene both with and without traditional plaque disclosure. Digital photographs were also taken. Images were analysed using a novel method and a percentage plaque index produced.
Traditional plaque indices are problematic due to their integral nature and their failure to detect small, but potentially clinically relevant changes in plaque area. The use of a fluorescent technique demonstrated good reliability although there was no correlation between red fluorescent plaque and total disclosed plaque suggesting that the auto-fluorescing plaque is not a good measure of total plaque volume.
The use of planimetric techniques can increase the power of plaque studies, potentially reducing the number of subjects and time required to separate therapies or products. Fluorescent methods of quantification have potential as they enable clear separation of the plaque covered and non-covered tooth surfaces.


Available from: Sue M Higham, Apr 21, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Biofilm is a formation of microbial material on tooth substrata. Several methods to quantify dental biofilm coverage have recently been reported in the literature, but at best they provide a semi-automated approach to quantification with significant input from a human grader that comes with the grader’s bias of what is foreground, background, biofilm, and tooth. Additionally, human assessment indices limit the resolution of the quantification scale; most commercial scales use five levels of quantification for biofilm coverage (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%). On the other hand, current state-of-theart techniques in automatic plaque quantification fail to make their way into practical applications owing to their inability to incorporate human input to handle misclassifications. This paper proposes a new interactive method for biofilm quantification in Quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) images of canine teeth that is independent of the perceptual bias of the grader. The method partitions a QLF image into segments of uniform texture and intensity called superpixels; every superpixel is statistically modeled as a realization of a single 2D Gaussian Markov random field (GMRF) whose parameters are estimated; the superpixel is then assigned to one of three classes (background, biofilm, tooth substratum) based on the training set of data. The quantification results show a high degree of consistency and precision. At the same time, the proposed method gives pathologists full control to post-process the automatic quantification by flipping misclassified superpixels to a different state (background, tooth, biofilm) with a single click, providing greater usability than simply marking the boundaries of biofilm and tooth as done by current state-of-the- art methods.
    IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 09/2014; 19(1). DOI:10.1109/JBHI.2014.2310204 · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Although several plaque indices exist, they rarely assess in detail the plaque adjacent to the gingival margin, an area most important for periodontal health. We thus aimed to develop a new Marginal Plaque Index (MPI) and to assess its validity and treatment sensitivity as compared to the international accepted Turesky modification of the Quigley and Hein Index (TQHI). Methods: Data from two studies with n=64 and n=67 participants, respectively, are reported here. Convergence of the MPI with the TQHI and concurrent and predictive validity with papillary bleeding index (PBI) were assessed as was treatment sensitivity to a treatment of proximal hygiene (Study 1) or tooth brushing (Study 2), respectively. Results: Convergent validity with the TQHI is very good. Concurrent and predictive validity parameters of the MPI are similar to the TQHI. The treatment sensitivity of the MPI exceeds the TQHI by far. This results in a reduction by more than 70% of the sample size needed to discover significant treatment effects. As expected, the largest treatment sensitivity was observed for proximal MPI measures in Study 1 while Study 2 showed largest effects for cervical measures. Conclusions: The MPI appears to be a valid plaque scoring system which assesses plaque at the gingival margin. It responds with high sensitivity to treatments aimed at plaque reduction at the gingival margin. Its treatment sensitivity and capacity to differ between proximal and cervical plaque makes it a promising tool for periodontal research.
    Journal of Periodontology 07/2014; DOI:10.1902/jop.2014.140285 · 2.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A placa bacteriana ou biofilme dental é o principal fator etiológico da doença periodontal, uma das afecções bucais mais prevalentes no mundo. Dada a existência de relação entre doença periodontal e higiene oral, do ponto de vista epidemiológico, desenvolveu-se um interesse crescente pela pesquisa experimental e pelas investigações clínicas. O conhecimento do problema, da sua extensão, valia a determinação do poder discriminatório dos mesmos. O objetivo dessa pesquisa foi descrever e analisar as principais formas de registro de placa bacteriana dental/ biofilme com intuito de subsidiar o pesquisador bem como o cirurgião dentista clínico na adoção do método mais adequado para o seu caso. As bases de dados: Medline, Lilacs e BBO foram consultadas sem limitação de período a fim de identificar o formato de registro de cada índice descrito na literatura. Observou-se o uso dos Índices de Higiene oral de diversas maneiras como: avaliação clínica da placa bacteriana, tanto em pesquisas de avaliação de produtos, quanto nas clínicas odontológicas; no monitoramento de pacientes; instrução de higienização e técnicas de higiene bucal. Pode-se notar que índices de placa bacteriana dentária são úteis e permitem o registro de diferentes formas ressaltando a importância de seu uso na prática clínica e em pesquisas.
    Revista Regional de Araçatuba, Associação Paulista de Cirurgiões Dentistas 12/2010; 31(2):57-62.