Cortisol-induced impairments of working memory require acute sympathetic activation

Section of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands.
Behavioral Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 3.25). 03/2005; 119(1):98-103. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.119.1.98
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The present study assessed whether the effects of cortisol on working memory depend on the level of adrenergic activity (as measured by sympathetic activation) during memory performance. After exposure to a psychosocial stress task, participants were divided into cortisol responders and nonresponders. Cortisol responders showed working memory impairments during the psychosocial stress phase, when cortisol and adrenergic activity were enhanced, whereas nonresponders did not. During recovery, however, when cortisol levels were elevated but adrenergic activity was normalized, working memory of responders did not differ from that of nonresponders. Among several stress measures, cortisol was the only significant predictor for working memory performance during stress. These findings suggest that adrenergic activation is essential for the impairing effects of stress-induced cortisol on working memory.

Download full-text


Available from: K. Roelofs, Aug 20, 2015
    • "A second possible factor, cortisol, has also been linked to impairments in working memory (Elzinga & Roelofs, 2005; Lupien et al., 1999). Stress-induced cortisol release is a good candidate as a mediator of the observed impairments in working memory after stress. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A large and growing body of research demonstrates the impact of psychological stress on working memory. However, the typical study approach tests the effects of a single biological or psychological factor on changes in working memory. The current study attempted to move beyond the standard single-factor assessment by examining the impact of 2 possible factors in stress-related working memory impairments. To this end, 60 participants completed a working memory task before and after either a psychological stressor writing task or a control writing task and completed measures of both cortisol and mind wandering. We also included a measure of state anxiety to examine the direct and indirect effect on working memory. We found that mind wandering mediated the relationship between state anxiety and working memory at the baseline measurement. This indirect relationship was moderated by cortisol, such that the impact of mind wandering on working memory increased as cortisol levels increased. No overall working memory impairment was observed following the stress manipulation, but increases in state anxiety and mind wandering were observed. State anxiety and mind wandering independently mediated the relationship between change in working memory and threat perception. The indirect paths resulted in opposing effects on working memory. Combined, the findings from this study suggest that cortisol enhances the impact of mind wandering on working memory, that state anxiety may not always result in stress-related working memory impairments, and that high working memory performance can protect against mind wandering. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
    Emotion 06/2015; DOI:10.1037/emo0000096 · 3.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Working memory has been shown to depend on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Carlson, 2010; Kandel et al., 1991; Gazzaniga et al., 2014). he prefrontal cortex is an area of particularly dense GR expression in the primate brain (Pryce, 2008; Sanchez et al., 2000), so GCs likely influence working memory by acting at receptors in this region. Also of note, as with memory consolidation and retrieval, the effects of GCs on working memory also depend on elevated norepinephrine in the amygdala (Elzinga and Roelofs, 2005). Notably, the impact of GCs on working memory once again seems to follow an inverted-U-shaped dose-response curve, but this curve is shifted to the left, so that smaller doses of GCs are sufficient to impair working memory compared to consolidation of episodic memory. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hormones have nuanced effects on learning and memory processes. The degree and direction of the effect (e.g., is memory impaired or enhanced?) depends on the dose, type and stage of memory, and type of material being learned, among other factors. This review will focus on two specific topics within the realm of effects of hormones on memory: (1) How glucocorticoids (the output hormones of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis) affect long-term memory consolidation, retrieval, and working memory, with a focus on neural mechanisms and effects of emotion; and (2) How oxytocin affects memory, with emphasis on a speculative hypothesis that oxytocin might exert its myriad effects on human social cognition and behavior via impacts on more general cognitive processes. Oxytocin-glucocorticoid interactions will be briefly addressed. These effects of hormones on memory will also be considered from an evolutionary perspective.
    06/2015; 1(2). DOI:10.1007/s40750-014-0010-4
    • "Both psychological and neurophysiological evidence suggests that high-intensity negative affect may modulate information processing through reductions in information processing capacity. For example, a number of findings suggest that stress and intensive negative affect narrow attention (Gable & Harmon-Jones, 2010) and reduce working memory capacity (Derakshan & Eysenck, 1998; Elzinga & Roelofs, 2005; Oei, Everaerd, Elzinga, Van Well, & Bermond, 2006). Indeed, our related work (Hoffmann, von Helversen, & Rieskamp, 2013; Mata et al., 2007) suggests that limitations in working memory capacity may be a viable explanation for differences in strategy use. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many models of decision making neglect emotional states that could affect individuals’ cognitive processes. The present work explores the effect of emotional stress on people’s cognitive processes when making probabilistic inferences. Two contrasting hypotheses are tested against one another: the uncertainty reduction and the attention narrowing hypothesis of how emotional stress affects decision making. In the experimental study, emotional stress was induced through the use of highly-aversive pictures immediately before each decision. Emotional state was assessed by both subjective (state anxiety, arousal, and pleasantness ratings) and objective (skin conductance) measures. The results show that emotional stress impacts decision making; in particular, emotionally aroused participants seem to have focused on the most important information and selected simpler decision strategies relative to participants in a control condition. The results are in line with the attention narrowing hypothesis and suggest that emotional stress can impact decision making through limited pre-decisional information search and the selection of simpler decision strategies.
    Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 01/2015; in press. · 2.84 Impact Factor
Show more