Article

Coronary artery calcification score by multislice computed tomography predicts the outcome of dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Department of Radiology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.
European Radiology (Impact Factor: 4.34). 07/2005; 15(6):1128-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2706-0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to determine whether a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score of less than 11 can reliably rule out myocardial ischemia detected by dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients suspected of having myocardial ischemia. In 114 of 136 consecutive patients clinically suspected of myocardial ischemia with an inconclusive diagnosis of myocardial ischemia, dobutamine CMR was performed and the CAC score was determined. The CAC score was obtained by 16-row multidetector compued tomography (MDCT) and was calculated according to the method of Agatston. The CAC score and the results of the dobutamine CMR were correlated and the positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) of the CAC score for dobutamine CMR were calculated. A total of 114 (87%) of the patients were eligible for this study. There was a significant correlation between the CAC score and dobutamine CMR (p<0.001). Patients with a CAC score of less than 11 showed no signs of inducible ischemia during dobutamine CMR. For a CAC score of less than 101, the NPV and the PPV of the CAC score for the outcome of dobutamine CMR were, respectively, 0.96 and 0.29. In patients with an inconclusive diagnosis of myocardial ischemia a MDCT CAC score of less than 11 reliably rules out myocardial ischemia detected by dobutamine CMR.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
35 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to investigate the factors that may influence image quality on multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) coronary angiography (CA). Two hundred twenty-four consecutive patients (161 men and 63 women; mean age, 52 years; age range, 34-76 years) evaluated with MDCT CA were included in the study. The evaluation of the quality of the patients' images was mainly based on the contrast material phase (early phase, optimal phase, or late phase) and the level of stepladder artifact (none, acceptable, or unacceptable). In addition, factors such as patient selection, patient preparation, scanning, processing, and steps of analysis, which may be affecting the quality of a final image, were examined independently. Patients who could not achieve sufficient breath-holding despite multiple breath exercises, those with a calcium score of 500 or higher, those with a heart rate greater than 90 bpm after metoprolol administration (because of shortening of the diastolic phase in the most still period), and those whose scanning was not completed were excluded from the study. The results for the remaining 224 patients were evaluated. Based on the contrast phase, there were 66 (29.5%) patients in the first group (early), 93 (41.5%) in the second group (optimal), and 65 (29%) in the third group (late). Among the 224 patients, the images of 152 (67.9%) had no stepladder artifact, those of 67 (29.9%) were of acceptable image quality, and those of 5 (2.2%) were of unacceptable image quality. It is important to obtain high-quality images to achieve correct interpretation with coronary artery CT angiography. This study aimed to describe a technique performed on 224 patients based on an array of factors ranging from patient selection to postprocessing. The results show that patient selection, cooperation with the patient, and breath-holding exercises play a very important role in obtaining the best images. In addition, a proper scanning technique (e.g., placement of electrocardiographic electrodes and contrast material phase) and postprocessing (e.g., reconstruction interval) may also contribute to obtaining high-quality images.
    Clinical Imaging 01/2007; 31(1):11-7. · 0.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Atherosclerotic plaque rupture and subsequent acute events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke, contribute to the majority of cardiovascular-related deaths. Calcification has emerged as a significant predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, challenging previously held notions that calcifications stabilize atherosclerotic plaques. In this review, we address this discrepancy through recent findings that not all calcifications are equivalent in determining plaque stability.
    Current opinion in lipidology. 10/2014; 25(5):327-332.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate prospectively, in patients with suspicion of coronary artery disease (CAD), the added value of coronary calcium scoring (CS) as adjunct to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for the diagnosis of morphological coronary stenosis in comparison to catheter angiography (CA). Sixty consecutive patients (8 women; 64 ± 10 years) referred to CA underwent CMR (1.5 T) including perfusion and late gadolinium-enhancement imaging as well as CS with computed tomography. Diagnostic performance was evaluated for CMR and CS separately, and for both methods combined, with CA as reference standard. Best CS threshold combined with a specificity >90% to predict significant stenosis in patients without abnormalities on CMR was determined from receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis. Abnormal CMR results were considered to indicate significant stenosis regardless of CS; CS above threshold reclassified patients to have CAD regardless of CMR. CA identified 104/960 (11%) coronary segments with coronary artery stenosis >50% in 36/60 (60%) patients. ROC revealed an area-under-the-curve of 0.83 (95%CI: 0.68-0.99) with the best CS threshold of 495 Agatston score (sensitivity 50%). CMR depicted 128/960 (13%) myocardial segments with abnormalities in 31/60 (52%) patients. Sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) of CMR were 78, 88, 72 and 90%. When adding CS to CMR, sensitivity and NPV increased to 89 and 83%, while specificity and PPV slightly decreased to 83 and 89%. Accuracy of the combined approach (87%) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that of CMR (82%) alone. Adding CS to CMR improves the accuracy for the detection of morphological CAD.
    The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 10/2010; 27(7):969-77. · 2.15 Impact Factor