In vitro growth and ovulation of follicles from ovaries of estrogen receptor (ER){alpha} and ER{beta} null mice indicate a role for ER{beta} in follicular maturation.

Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/National Institutes of Health, MD B3-02, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
Endocrinology (Impact Factor: 4.64). 07/2005; 146(6):2817-26. DOI: 10.1210/en.2004-1108
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Both estrogen receptor (ER) alpha and beta are expressed within the ovary and lack of either of these receptors affects ovarian function. In this study, the role of ERalpha and ERbeta in folliculogenesis and ovulation was further analyzed. Evaluation of ovarian follicle populations in wild-type and ERbeta knockout (betaERKO) ovaries revealed reduced late antral growth and ovulatory capacity of betaERKO follicles, indicated by reduced numbers of large antral follicles and corpora lutea and increased atresia of large antral follicles. An in vitro culture system was used to study growth, rupture, and luteinization of wild-type, ERalpha knockout (alphaERKO) and betaERKO ovarian follicles. alphaERKO follicles exhibited wild-type-like growth and ovulation rates but an increased capacity to synthesize estradiol. In contrast, betaERKO follicles showed a significant lack of progression from early antral to large antral stage, decreased estradiol production, and reduced ovulation. Expression patterns of several genes involved in follicle maturation and ovulation were analyzed in follicles grown in vitro. Ar, Pgr, and Has2 mRNA expression levels were the same among the three genotypes. However, betaERKO follicles showed reduced expression of Cyp19 mRNA during follicle maturation and reduced Lhcgr and Ptgs2 mRNA expression after human chorionic gonadotropin stimulus. Luteinization occurs normally in alphaERKO and betaERKO follicles, shown by increased progesterone secretion and increased cdkn1b mRNA expression after human chorionic gonadotropin. Collectively, these data indicate that ERbeta, but not ERalpha, plays a direct role in folliculogenesis. ERbeta appears to facilitate follicle maturation from the early antral to the preovulatory stage.

Download full-text


Available from: Kenneth S Korach, Jul 01, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Growth and maturation of healthy oocytes within follicles requires bidirectional signaling and intercellular gap junctional communication. Aberrant endocrine signaling and loss of gap junctional communication between the oocyte and granulosa cells leads to compromised folliculogenesis, oocyte maturation, and oocyte competency, consequently impairing fertility. Given that oocyte-specific DNA methylation establishment at imprinted genes occurs during this growth phase, we determined whether compromised endocrine signaling and gap junctional communication would disrupt de novo methylation acquisition using ERβ and connexin37 genetic models. To compare mutant oocytes to control oocytes, DNA methylation acquisition was first examined in individual, 20–80 μm control oocytes at three imprinted genes, Snrpn, Peg3, and Peg1. We observed that each gene has its own size-dependent acquisition kinetics, similar to previous studies. To determine whether compromised endocrine signaling and gap junctional communication disrupted de novo methylation acquisition,individual oocytes from Esr2- and Gja4-deficient mice were also assessed for DNA methylation establishment. We observed no aberrant or delayed acquisition of DNA methylation at Snrpn, Peg3, or Peg1 in oocytes from Esr2-deficient females, and no perturbation in Snrpn or Peg3 de novo methylation in oocytes from Gja4-null females. However, Gja4 deficiency resulted in a loss or delay in methylation acquisition at Peg1. One explanation for this difference between the three loci analyzed is the late establishment of DNA methylation at the Peg1 gene. These results indicate that compromised fertility though impaired intercellular communication can lead to imprinting acquisition errors. Further studies are required to determine the effects of subfertility/infertility originating from impaired signaling and intercellular communication during oogenesis on imprint maintenance during preimplantation development.
    Frontiers in Genetics 07/2012; 3:129. DOI:10.3389/fgene.2012.00129
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nowadays, abundantly different transcripts related to reproductive traits using mouse model have been identified by microarray analysis with the robustness, which were needed of re-evaluation with quantitive real time PCR (qPCR). Meanwhile, pig QTL databases were established but with large spans in the confidence interval for QTL location. Therefore, a genome-wide comparative and functional analysis of the association between mouse microarrays analysis results and reported pig QTLs is needed to better elucidate the genetic and physiological background of pig enhanced reproductive performance in genomics. Here, we employed a microarray dataset of a high fertility mouse line and applied gene set enrichment analysis method to identify significant mouse genes in a pathway level. Next we used a comparative genomic approach to find the homologous pig genes and locate them to the interval of the reported QTL for pigs' traits based on AnimalQTLdb. Finally, we identified some pathways participating in pig high fertility, and some pig genes were further identified within the reported QTL location related to reproductive performance. Combining microarray analysis of mouse high fertility dataset by GSEA with pigQTLdb will substantially help us to identify candidate genes in reported QTL regions related to pig reproduction that are eventually responsible for increased fertility performance in pig and are also helpful for understanding the genetic information of pig reproduction in genomics. Furthermore, we can also provide some novel pig genes in identified pathways with relationship of reproduction.
    African journal of agricultural research 08/2011; 6:3196-3202. · 0.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Reviews in Molecular Biotechnology 01/2011; 6(7):155-165.