Simple decompression or anterior subcutaneous transposition for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a cost-minimization analysis--Part 2.

Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Neurosurgery (Impact Factor: 2.53). 04/2005; 56(3):531-6; discussion 531-6. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000154132.40212.6E
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A randomized controlled trial was reported recently, in which simple decompression and anterior subcutaneous transposition were compared for treatment of ulnaropathy at the elbow. Clinically, both surgical options seem to be equally effective. The objective of this study is to compare the costs, from a societal standpoint, of simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition in Euros.
Published and unpublished data from a randomized controlled trial that compared simple decompression and anterior subcutaneous transposition were used. The investigators tabulated the actual costs incurred for professional fees, use of the operating room, duration of sick leave, reintervention, and treatment of complications directly related to the surgical treatment.
The total costs per group and per patient were statistically significantly less for those treated with simple decompression. The total median costs per patient were 1124 Euros for simple decompression and 2730 Euros for anterior subcutaneous transposition. The main difference was in the costs related to sick leave, which is significantly shorter for simple decompression. There also was a statistically significant difference in operation time in favor of simple decompression. A remarkable finding was that paid workers in both treatment groups returned to work much later than unpaid workers.
Although clinically equally effective, simple decompression was associated with lower cost than anterior subcutaneous transposition for the treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Compared with anterior subcutaneous transposition, we recommend simple decompression for the treatment of idiopathic ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcome with subjective and neurophysiological parameters following partial medial epicondylectomy (pME) and to evaluate complications and recurrence rates. A retrospective analysis was performed in 29 patients (18 males and 11 females) with cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) who underwent pME. Mean time follow-up was 41.4 months. For subjective parameters, DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand), a self-created questionnaire about postoperative satisfaction and a visual pain scale (VAS) have been used. All patients were classified according to the Mc Gowan Classification (McG) and Wilson & Krout Classification (WKC). The patients were examined by nerve conduction velocity. Total mean of the DASH score was 24.8 points. In a questionnaire with integrated pain score (1-5), 96% of the patients declared a postoperative improvement, whereas 41.4% patients of the latter group were very contented with the results, 37.9% were contented, 17.2% were less contented and 3.4% were discontented. The VAS for evaluation of postoperative pain showed an average of 2.36 (0-5.9) out of 10. Of the patients, 68.0% were classified as grade I according to McG and 68.0% as excellent or good according to WKC. Motor nerve conduction velocity improved from 34.8 m/s preoperatively to 48.2 m/s postoperatively. One patient developed a haematoma and three patients (10.3%) had to be classified as recurrence. High postoperative rates of patient satisfaction and improved neurophysiological results could be achieved by pME.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 01/2011; 131(8):1027-33. · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of in situ decompression in patients with severe ulnar nerve compression is still controversial. Thirty patients with severe ulnar nerve compression confirmed clinically and electrophysiologically underwent simple decompression. The mean age of the patients was 58 (range 26-87) years. Through incisions ≤4 cm the nerves were fully visualized and decompressed. Outcome was measured prospectively using Modified Bishop's score (BS), grip and pinch strengths and two-point discrimination (2PD). Significant improvement in power (p = 0.01) and pinch grip (p = 0.001) was noted at 1 year. The grip strength continued to improve up to 1 year. According to the BS, 24 patients (80%) had good to excellent results at 1 year. Minimally invasive in situ decompression is technically simple, safe and gives good results in patients with severe nerve compression. The BS and 2PD were more reliable than grip strength in assessing these patients at follow-up.
    The Journal of hand surgery, European volume. 09/2011; 37(2):115-22.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The outcome of decompression for long-standing symptoms of nerve entrapments in the proximal forearm was investigated in a retrospective study of 205 patients using a self-assessment questionnaire, 45 months after the operation. The questionnaire consisted of visual analogue scale recordings of pre- and postoperative pain during rest and activity, questions about remaining symptoms and appreciation of the result and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand form (DASH). Altogether, 59% of the patients were satisfied, 58% considered themselves improved, and 3% as being entirely relieved of all symptoms. Pain decreased significantly (P = 0.001). There was a significant correlation between preoperative duration and patient perceived post-operative pain. Preoperative pain was a chief complaint, and pain reduction appears to be the principal gain of the operation. Although the majority of the patients benefited from the operation, a substantial proportion was not satisfied. There is apparently room for improvement of the diagnostic and surgical methods applied in this study.
    Advances in orthopedics. 01/2011; 2011:727689.


Available from
May 23, 2014