Article

Relationship between pain symptoms and referred sensory and trophic changes in patients with gallbladder pathology.

Ce.S.I., G. D'Annunzio Foundation, G. D'Annunzio University of Chieti, Pescara, Italy.
Pain (Impact Factor: 5.84). 04/2005; 114(1-2):239-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.024
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The relationship was investigated between algogenic potential of gallbladder pathology and occurrence/extent of sensory and trophic changes in the referred area. Five groups of subjects were studied, with: symptomatic gallbladder calculosis (3-20 colics); asymptomatic calculosis; symptomatic gallbladder shape abnormality (8-18 colics); asymptomatic shape abnormality; normal gallbladder/no symptoms. At the cystic point (CP) and contralaterally, all underwent measurement of: pain thresholds to electrical stimulation of skin, subcutis and muscle; thickness of subcutis and muscle via ultrasounds. Contralaterally to CP, all thresholds were not significantly different in the five groups. At CP, subcutis and muscle thresholds were significantly lower in symptomatic vs asymptomatic patients and/or normals (0.0001<P< 0.05). In symptomatic cases, at CP compared to contralaterally, subcutis and muscle thresholds were significantly lower (0.0001<P<0.02), subcutis thickness was significantly higher and muscle thickness significantly lower (0.006<P<0.02). Subcutis and muscle thresholds at CP in symptomatic patients were significantly and inversely correlated linearly to the number of colics (P<0.0004; P<0.0001). Patients with symptomatic calculosis were re-evaluated after 6 months; those not presenting further colics showed a significant increase in subcutis and muscle thresholds at CP, while those who continued presenting colics showed a further significant threshold decrease (0.01<P<0.05); tissue thickness did not vary. Referred hyperalgesia and altered trophism from the gallbladder only occur in painful pathology, their extent being modulated by the amount of perceived pain. The results suggest different mechanisms by which visceral nociceptive inputs trigger sensory vs trophic changes in the referred area.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
130 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate whether a diclofenac epolamine + heparin topical (plaster) is more effective than diclofenac plaster alone in reducing deep somatic hyperalgesia in subjects without spontaneous pain and whether the effect is linked to or independent of the anti-edematous action of heparin. Prospective, double-blind, randomized and controlled, four-arm parallel design trial. One hundred and four patients (84 women, 20 men, mean age 42.2 ± 13.3 years), with deep somatic hyperalgesia in one thigh, randomly assigned to one of 4 groups of 26 each. Each group underwent one of the following plaster treatments on one thigh: diclofenac+heparin; diclofenac; heparin; placebo, for 7 days, renewing the plaster every 24 hours. Before treatment (day 1), at day 4 and day 8, assessment of (a) pressure and electrical pain thresholds of vastus lateralis and overlying subcutis and skin; and (b) structure/thickness of subcutis and muscle with ultrasounds at the same level. During treatment, in placebo and heparin, no significant threshold changes, except subcutis thresholds which increased slightly (P < 0.02); in diclofenac and diclofenac+heparin, significant increase in all thresholds (0.0001 < P < 0.04). Electrical muscle pain thresholds increased significantly more in diclofenac+heparin than in diclofenac, heparin, and placebo (0.0001 < P < 0.04). In all groups: no edema and thickness changes at ultrasounds in muscle and subcutis. Topical diclofenac+heparin is significantly more effective than diclofenac alone in reducing muscle hyperalgesia in subjects without spontaneous pain, independently of the anti-edematous action of heparin. The results provide a rationale for the use of diclofenac+heparin also in algogenic conditions without evident signs of injury/edema/hematoma.
    Pain Practice 01/2014; · 2.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Zusammenfassung Beschäftigt man sich mit der Literatur zum Phänomen der Head-Zonen, so findet man in den gängigen Lehrbüchern der Anatomie, Physiologie und Neurologie stets den gleichen Typ von Abbildung vor. Aufgrund der Namensgebung könnte man annehmen, dass diese Abbildung auf Sir Henry Head zurückgehe. Verfolgt man jedoch die Referenzen etwa 100 Jahre zurück, so findet man das Originalbild letztlich in der deutschen Ausgabe des Chirurgie-Buches „Surgical Applied Anatomy“ von Sir Frederick Treves aus dem Jahre 1914. Da weder die Autoren noch die Illustratoren des Buches experimentell über die Head-Zonen geforscht haben, muss diese Abbildung folglich auf Ergebnissen basieren, die aus älteren Quellen stammen. Bei Begutachtung der beiden großen systematischen Arbeiten vor 1914, nämlich denen von Sir Henry Head und Sir James Mackenzie stellten wir fest, dass besagte Abbildung vorrangig auf den Arbeiten Mackenzies zu basieren scheint. Leider lassen sich die Quellen und Originalbilder, auf denen der Zeichner seiner Zeit die Abbildung begründet hat, heute nicht mehr nachvollziehen. Da der Zeichner keine der beiden Arbeiten exakt reproduziert hat, sind im Laufe der Zeit eine Reihe interessanter Fakten beider Autoren verloren gegangen. So wurde etwa das Phänomen der Headschen Maximalpunkte komplett ignoriert und ist daher heute fast vollständig in Vergessenheit geraten. Entsprechend muss man feststellen, dass die heutigen Darstellungen der Head-Zonen, die allesamt auf der Abbildung von 1914 basieren, eine Reduktion der exakt erarbeiteten und dokumentierten Ergebnisse von Head und Mackenzie darstellen. Deren Evidenzgrad ist daher als eher gering einzustufen.
    Der Schmerz 04/2011; 25(2):132-139. · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The primary objectives of this study were to explore the pain experience following gynecological laparoscopy performed for non-acute pain conditions and to determine whether pre-operative psychological tests and quantitative tests of sensitization can predict postoperative pain. Participants included 61 women undergoing laparoscopy for non-acute pain (n=61). A second group of 16 women undergoing tubal ligation was included to explore whether laparoscopy induced a painful postoperative response in women without preoperative pain. Subjective tests included numeric pain scale, pain catastrophizing scale, depression scale, global assessment of change and the McGill Pain Questionnaire Short Form. Quantitative sensory testing included abdominal cutaneous allodynia, trigger points and reduced pain thresholds. The non-acute pain sample had 80% power to detect a difference of 0.5 SD in average pain levels. Analysis included parametric and non-parametric comparisons of groups, univariate and linear regression analysis of clinically relevant variables. In women undergoing tubal ligation, pain levels were low pre-and postoperatively. In women undergoing surgery for non-acute pain, pain levels at 6 months and all psychological test scores were significantly reduced compared to baseline (p< 0.001 and p=0.001, respectively). Amongst those with positive quantitative pain tests of sensitization at baseline, average postoperative pain was also significantly reduced (p<0.001). Univariate analysis demonstrated only tests of sensitization correlated with change in average pain level (p=0.01). Regression analysis suggested that baseline pain, catastrophizing and the presence of cutaneous allodynia significantly predicted pain levels six months after surgery (p<0.001). Pain following laparoscopic surgery for non-acute painful conditions can be predicted by baseline pain, catastrophizing and the presence of allodynia, a simple q-tip test indicating sensitization.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 04/2014; · 3.97 Impact Factor