New insights into iron homeostasis through the study of non-HFE hereditary haemochromatosis.
ABSTRACT Non-HFE haemochromatosis is a negative definition applied to all those haemochromatosis disorders that are unrelated to HFE mutations. Four genes are responsible for the distinct types of non-HFE haemochromatosis: hepcidin and hemojuvelin are the genes involved in type 2 or juvenile haemochromatosis, transferrin receptor 2 is involved in type 3 haemochromatosis, and ferroportin 1 is mutated in type 4, the atypical dominant form of primary iron overload. Molecular genetic studies of these conditions have greatly contributed to our understanding of the regulation of iron absorption. A milestone was the discovery that hepcidin, the key iron regulator in mice, is the gene mutated in the most severe, juvenile form of haemochromatosis. This finding indicates a fundamental role of hepcidin in inhibiting both iron absorption from duodenal cells and iron release from macrophages, and has opened up a new view of haemochromatosis as a disorder of hepcidin.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Hemochromatosis, or iron storage disease, has been associated with significant liver disease and mortality in captive Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus). The physiologic basis for this susceptibility has not been established. In humans, a deficiency or resistance to the iron regulatory hormone, hepcidin has been implicated in the development of hereditary hemochromatosis. In the present study, we compared the coding sequence of the hepcidin gene in eight species of bats representing three distinct taxonomic families with diverse life histories and dietary preferences. Bat hepcidin mRNA encoded a 23 amino acid signal peptide, a 34 or 35 amino acid pro-region, and a 25 amino acid mature peptide, similar to other mammalian species. Differences in the sequence of the portion of the hepcidin gene that encodes the mature peptide that might account for the increased susceptibility of the Egyptian fruit bat to iron storage disease were not identified. Variability in gene sequence corresponded to the taxonomic relationship amongst species.Research in Veterinary Science 11/2013; · 1.51 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: It is well-known that individuals with increased iron levels are more prone to thrombotic diseases, mainly due to the presence of unliganded iron, and thereby the increased production of hydroxyl radicals. It is also known that erythrocytes (RBCs) may play an important role during thrombotic events. Therefore the purpose of the current study was to assess whether RBCs had an altered morphology in individuals with hereditary hemochromatosis (HH), as well as some who displayed hyperferritinemia (HF). Using scanning electron microscopy, we also assessed means by which the RBC and fibrin morphology might be normalized. An important objective was to test the hypothesis that the altered RBC morphology was due to the presence of excess unliganded iron by removing it through chelation. Very striking differences were observed, in that the erythrocytes from HH and HF individuals were distorted and had a much greater axial ratio compared to that accompanying the discoid appearance seen in the normal samples. The response to thrombin, and the appearance of a platelet-rich plasma smear, were also markedly different. These differences could largely be reversed by the iron chelator desferal and to some degree by the iron chelator clioquinol, or by the free radical trapping agents salicylate or selenite (that may themselves also be iron chelators). These findings are consistent with the view that the aberrant morphology of the HH and HF erythrocytes is caused, at least in part, by unliganded ('free') iron, whether derived directly via raised ferritin levels or otherwise, and that lowering it or affecting the consequences of its action may be of therapeutic benefit. The findings also bear on the question of the extent to which accepting blood donations from HH individuals may be desirable or otherwise.PLoS ONE 01/2014; 9(1):e85271. · 3.53 Impact Factor