Assessing communication competence: a review of current tools.

Family Practice Center, Maine Medical Center, 272 Congress Street, Portland, ME 04101, USA.
Family medicine (Impact Factor: 0.85). 04/2005; 37(3):184-92.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The assessment of communication competence has become a major priority of medical educational, policy, and licensing organizations in the United States and Canada. Multiple tools are available to assess communication competence, but there are few studies that compare the tools.
A consensus panel of six family medicine educators evaluated 15 instruments measuring the physician-patient interview. The primary evaluation criteria came from the Kalamazoo Consensus Statement (KCS), which derived from a multidisciplinary panel of experts that defined seven essential elements of physician-patient communication. We evaluated psychometric properties of the instruments and other assessment criteria felt to be important to family physicians (exploring family issues, interview efficiency, and usability/practicality).
Instruments that received the highest ratings on KCS elements were designed for faculty raters and varied in their practicality/usability ratings and psychometric properties. Few instruments were rated high on psychometric properties or exploring family issues.
The process successfully reviewed and provided a framework for assessing communication skills instruments. There is a need to expand the study, including use of a larger cohort of reviewers to provide more validity to the results and minimize potential biases.

  • Journal of Service Management 04/2013; 24(2):151-169. DOI:10.1108/09564231311323944 · 1.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Trust in health-care insurers is vital. It mediates important health behaviors that affect our lives. To date, the examination of antecedents of trust in health-care insurers was limited due to variance among multiple health plans. This study examines trust in health-care insurers that offer identical plans. Five categories of antecedents were tested: demographics of patients, attitudes of patients, communication style of the physician, situational health characteristics, and experiences of patients. Findings extend the existing knowledge regarding trust in health insurers. Applying service-marketing concepts, trust in physicians and satisfaction with insurers were the strongest predictors of trust in health-care insurers.
    Services Marketing Quarterly 01/2015; 36(1):77-93. DOI:10.1080/15332969.2015.978241
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to analyse the psy-chometric properties of the short version of the Calgary Cambridge Guides and to decide whether it can be recom-mended for use in the assessment of communications skills in young undergraduate medical students. Using a translated version of the Guide, 30 members from the Department of General Practice rated 5 videotaped encounters between students and simulated patients twice. Item analysis should detect possible floor and/or ceiling effects. The construct validity was investigated using exploratory factor analysis. Intra-rater reliability was measured in an interval of 3 months, inter-rater reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient. The score distribution of the items showed no ceiling or floor effects. Four of the five factors extracted from the factor analysis represented important constructs of doctor-patient communication The ratings for the first and second round of assessing the videos correlated at 0.75 (p<0.0001). Intraclass correlation coefficients for each item ranged were moderate and ranged from 0.05 to 0.57. Reasonable score distributions of most items without ceiling or floor effects as well as a good test-retest reliability and construct validity recommend the C-CG as an instrument for assessing communication skills in undergraduate medical students. Some deficiencies in inter-rater reliability are a clear indication that raters need a thorough instruction before using the C-CG.
    12/2014; 5:212-218. DOI:10.5116/ijme.5454.c665

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014