Article

Risk of puerperal and non-puerperal recurrence of illness following bipolar affective puerperal (post-partum) psychosis

Neuropsychiatric Genetics Unit, Department of Psychological Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, Wales, UK.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 7.34). 04/2005; 186:258-9. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.186.3.258
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The clinical value of information on the risk of future psychiatric illness in women who have experienced puerperal (post-partum) psychosis has been limited by inconsistencies in terminology and nosology. Here we report rates of subsequent puerperal and non-puerperal episodes, in a well characterised sample of women diagnosed with clearly defined bipolar affective puerperal psychosis (n=103). Out of 54 women having further children, 31(57%; 95% CI 44-69) experienced an additional puerperal psychotic episode, and 64 of 103 women (62%; 95% CI 52-71) experienced a non-puerperal affective episode during the follow-up period (mean duration 9 years). A history of bipolar episodes prior to the puerperal psychosis did not predict risk following subsequent pregnancies, but positive family history of mental illness predicted shorter time to non-puerperal relapse.

2 Followers
 · 
89 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: postnatal depression (PND) is defined as a psychological mood disorder that occurs in a mother within six weeks of her giving birth. It refers to an episode that causes mood disturbance and it could begin in, or extend into, the postpartum period. It is thought to have a high impact upon the mother’s health as well as the family’s functioning and the child’s development. Socio-demographic, psych-social, and physical activity factors may all contribute to postpartum mood and ability to cope with responsibilities. The primary aim of this study was to determine which of these factors predicted PND in postpartum women. A secondary aim was to identify the socio-demographic and psycho-social predictors of physical activity in postpartum women . Methods: The study used a cross-sectional correlational design. A sample of 150 postpartum women was sent a package of six standardised questionnaires. Results: There was no association between physical activity and PND; however, older mothers, mothers of younger children, mothers who are less reluctant to ask for help, and mothers who are more satisfied with the help they get experience lower levels of PND. Mothers of older babies, mothers with more children, and less educated mothers are more likely to engage in caregiving activities, whereas mothers with fewer children and higher levels of partner support are more likely to engage in occupational activities. None of the socio-demographic factors or any of the parenting factors predicted levels of sporting activity.
    Frontiers in Psychology 05/2014; 5(597). DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00597 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The postpartum period is considered a time of heightened vulnerability to bipolar disorder. The primary goal of this study was to examine the frequency and the polarity of postpartum episodes in a clinical sample of women with bipolar disorder who were medication-free during their pregnancies. In addition, we sought to examine whether there are differences in terms of clinical features of bipolar disorder between women with and without postpartum episodes. Lastly, we analyzed the potential relationship between polarity of the postpartum episodes and clinical features of bipolar disorder. The presence/absence of postpartum episodes and their characteristics were obtained from medical records of 276 women with bipolar disorder who were medication-free during their pregnancies. Two hundred seven women (75.0 %) had a history of one or more postpartum mood episodes: depressive (79.7 %), (hypo)manic (16.4 %), or mixed episodes (3.9 %). Psychotic symptoms during postpartum episodes were associated with depression in 37 (22.4 %) patients, with mania in 19 (67.8 %) patients, and with mixed episodes in 7 (87.5 %) patients. Postpartum manic and mixed episodes were significantly associated with type I disorder and with psychotic features. Our findings indicate high risk of clinically ascertained mood episodes during postpartum period in bipolar women who are not treated during pregnancy.
    Archives of Women s Mental Health 01/2014; 17(5). DOI:10.1007/s00737-013-0405-4 · 1.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To explore the perceived support needs and preferences of women with postpartum psychosis and their partners. A multisite, exploratory, qualitative descriptive design was used. A purposive sample of nine mothers (Canada, n = 7, United States, n = 2) and eight fathers (Canada, n = 7, United States, n = 1) was obtained. Data were collected through one-on-one, in-depth, semistructured interviews. Inductive thematic analysis was used to explore the qualitative transcripts. Couples who experienced postpartum psychosis looked to health professionals to provide reassurance and information on the illness, its management, and prognosis. The quality of support and interactions with staff varied, and participants reported difficulty identifying and obtaining professional support upon discharge. All participants felt that support groups for postpartum illnesses would help to normalize the experience and dissipate feelings of isolation. Participants reported that informal support networks provided practical help but were limited or hindered recovery and management due to lack of knowledge of the illness. Despite feeling overwhelmed and isolated, fathers were reluctant to identify their own support needs and struggled to ask for help from professionals and their informal support network. These findings suggest that clinical interventions are needed to address the support needs and aid in the recovery of families affected by postpartum psychosis.
    Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing 02/2012; 41(2):236-45. DOI:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01329.x · 1.20 Impact Factor